Biomedical subjects

Fiona Poland

Publications and source records attributed to Fiona Poland.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

A pragmatic, unblinded randomised controlled trial comparing an occupational therapy-led lifestyle approach and routine GP care for panic disorder treatment in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Treated anxiety increased in the UK by over 30% since 1994. Medication and psychological treatment is most common, but outcomes are sometimes poor, with high relapse rates. Lifestyle has a potential role in treatment, but is not considered in clinical guidelines. Panic disorder is potentially influenced by lifestyle factors. METHODS: 16 week unblinded pragmatic randomised controlled trial in 15 East of England primary care practices (2 Primary Care Trusts). Participants met DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder with/without agoraphobia. Follow-up at 20 weeks and 10 months. Control arm, unrestricted routine GP care. Trial Arm, Occupational therapy-led lifestyle treatment comprising: lifestyle review of fluid intake, diet pattern, exercise, caffeine, alcohol and nicotine; negotiation of positive lifestyle changes; monitoring and review of impact of changes. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Beck Anxiety Inventory. DATA ANALYSIS: Intention-to-treat analysis provided between-group comparisons using analysis of co-variance. Bonferroni method to adjust p-values. RESULTS: From 199 referrals, 36 GP care and 31 lifestyle arm patients completed to final follow-up. Significantly lower lifestyle arm BAI scores at 20 weeks (p<0.001), non-significant (p=0.167) at 10 months after Bonferroni correction. 63.6% lifestyle arm, and 40% GP arm patients (p=0.045) panic-free at 20 weeks; 67.7% and 48.5% (p=0.123) respectively at 10 months. LIMITATIONS: Final study size/power calls for caution in interpreting findings. CONCLUSIONS: A lifestyle approach may provide a clinically effective intervention at least as effective as routine GP care, with significant improvements in anxiety compared with routine GP care at the end of treatment. Further study is required before suggesting practice changes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Development pathways in learning to be a physiotherapist.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few studies have examined the experiences of students' professional socialization in physiotherapy. This international longitudinal study aimed to study experiences of situated learning and change in a student cohort during a physiotherapy education programme. METHOD: A phenomenographic design with semi-structured interviews was carried out with a cohort of physiotherapy students from two sites, strategically selected for variation in gender, age, educational background, work experience and academic level. Interviews were carried out after each of the first five semesters in the programme by a team of researchers. Seventy-six interviews explored students' learning experiences. Analysis identified the variation in experiences seen as important to becoming a physiotherapist. RESULTS: Distinct perceptions of professional growth and progression are identified in four pathways of development: 'Reflecting on Practice'; 'Communicating with Others'; 'Performing Skills'; and 'Searching Evidence'. These pathways demonstrate qualitative differences in the focus of learning experiences and preferred learning context, and include learning in a context which supports reflection, learning as agreed by others in a context with patients and other professionals, learning physiotherapy skills in a practice context and learning formal knowledge in a context where theory can be linked with practice. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of students professional growth can be seen in a variety of development pathways. Each shows progress of professional growth in the 'what' as changes in experiences and the 'how' as ways of learning from them. In addition, the pattern of pathways in a cohort may change from one semester to another suggesting individuals may adopt different learning pathways throughout their education. Teaching staff are challenged to consider how they recognize a variation in development pathways in their student cohorts and how they purposefully ensure experiences to guide students through different learning pathways in socialization to become a physiotherapist.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2006

Physiotherapy students' professional identity on the edge of working life.

Market expectations of physiotherapists reflect changing demands of health care for client centred, community based management of chronic disease in an ageing population. This study forms a component part of a longitudinal study of students' socialization throughout their education programme examining the outcome of professional identity throughout professional socialization processes. The aim of this study was to explore characteristics of graduating physiotherapy students' professional identity before leaving the University. An interview guide, agreed between the Swedish and UK researchers, was used to focus the semi-structured interviews. The phenomenon of professional identity of 18 students was studied through their perceptions of their role, practice, vision, beliefs and scope of practice as physiotherapists. A phenomenographic approach was taken to analysis and identified three qualitatively different categories of professional identity as a physiotherapist which are described as the Empowerer, the Educator and the Treater. A variation of concepts in professional identity at graduation questions the extent to which educators consider how they guide the development of professional identities which fit the expectations of stakeholders and which are able to respond to promotion and development of the profession of physiotherapy in the changing fields of health care over future years.

Delivery of Health Care, Integrated↗

PubMed2004

Occupational therapy compared with social work assessment for older people. An economic evaluation alongside the CAMELOT randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare costs and outcome of occupational therapy-led assessment with social worker-led assessment of older people, in terms of their independence and quality of life. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial. The analysis took viewpoints of health services and patients. The primary outcome measure for cost-effectiveness was dependency using the Community Dependency Index (CDI). Secondary outcomes included utility scores based on the EuroQoL (EQ-5D). Resource use was measured for each patient, from clinical records and from patient carer interviews at 8 months. Unit costs of health and social care resources were derived from local sources and national datasets. Cost-effectiveness was analysed using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two arms of the trial in terms of cost-effectiveness. There is an apparent increase in mean cost per case for the occupational therapy arm but this is not statistically significant (mean difference in cost per case 542 pounds, 95% CI 434-1,519 pounds). Mean total costs of care per participant were 4,379 pounds and 3,837 pounds for the occupational therapy and social work arms, respectively. At best the intervention would improve outcomes at a cost of 14,000 pounds per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The probability of such an outcome was <50%. CONCLUSIONS: From a policy perspective, the lack of difference in clinical and cost-effectiveness means that either a social work or an occupational therapy service is successful in making care assessments that enable an older person to remain in their own home.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Are occupational therapists more effective than social workers when assessing frail older people? Results of CAMELOT, a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of occupational therapist-led assessments of older people on dependency and service costs with that of social worker-led assessments. DESIGN: Pragmatic community-based randomised controlled trial over 2 years 4 months. SETTING: Cambridgeshire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 321 older people aged 65 and over living in their own homes and 113 carers. INTERVENTION: participants were randomised to two groups, to receive either occupational therapist-led or social worker-led assessment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was dependency (Community Dependency Index). Secondary outcomes included quality of life scores (EQ-5D) and psychological outlook (Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)). Outcome measures for carers included Carer Assessment of Difficulty Index (CADI), PSS and EQ-5D, collected at baseline, 4 and 8 months. Resource use data were collected from professional practice records, participants and carers at final follow-up. RESULTS: 264 (82%) of the randomised participants completed the study. No between-group statistically significant differences were found, except that carers in the occupational therapist arm had significantly better EQ-5D scores at the 8 month follow-up (thermometer P = 0.03) and in the social worker arm better CADI scores on stress (P = 0.047) and amount of caring (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: There was no clear difference in patient-centred effectiveness measures between occupational therapists and social workers in assessing frail older people and their carers in the community. More extensive use of primary care health services by occupational therapists may have contributed to the differences in EQ-5D scores for carers. Delays in making occupational therapy assessments and in completing recommended housing adaptations may have contributed to these negative findings.

Aged↗