Passive coating: the dream does not come true.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Carbon↗
Biomedical subjects
Flavio Airoldi
Publications and source records attributed to Flavio Airoldi.
Elective stenting in small coronary arteries: results of the Italian prospective multicenter registry MICROSCOPE.
BACKGROUND: The role of stent implantation in small coronary arteries is still controversial. The MICROSCOPE study (Ministenting in small coronary arteries, a prospective evaluation) is a multicenter registry addressed to prospectively evaluate the immediate and mid-term clinical and angiographic results of elective stenting of lesions located in coronary arteries with an angiographic reference diameter < or = 2.75 mm. METHODS: A total of 146 patients (160 lesions) were included in the study. The percentage of complex lesions (B2 and C lesions) was 49.3%. The clinical indications for stent implantation were: stable angina (55.0%), unstable angina (24.6%), and clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic patients (20.4%); 60% of patients had multivessel disease. Stent deployment could be performed in 96.2% of lesions. The baseline reference diameter was 2.12 +/- 0.36 mm. In all cases the Ministent (Cordis, a J&J Company, Miami, FL, USA), specifically designed for small coronary arteries, was employed. The stent was pre-mounted on low profile balloons available in three different diameters (2.25, 2.50 and 2.75 mm) and three different lengths (11, 15 e 26 mm). RESULTS: The primary endpoint of successful stent-assisted angioplasty in all study vessels without major adverse cardiac events was achieved in 95.8% of the patients. The minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.64 +/- 0.24 to 2.02 +/- 0.43 mm and the dimensions of the stenosis (expressed as a percentage of the diameter of the coronary vessel) decreased from 68.6 +/- 10.8 to 16.2 +/- 10.7% (< 30% standard deviation in all cases). After the procedure all the patients received double antiplatelet therapy for 4 weeks. Post-procedural complications were limited to 2 patients (1.3%) who had a non-Q wave myocardial infarction at 6 months of follow-up; 13 patients (11%) required target lesion revascularization. No patient died following the procedure. Angiographic control was performed in 44% of lesions. The minimal lumen diameter decreased to 1.12 +/- 0.47 mm and the percent stenosis increased to 45.9 +/- 23.2%. The incidence of binary restenosis (stenosis > or = 50%) was 41%. CONCLUSIONS: Elective stenting of small coronary arteries with the Ministent can be safely performed and is associated with a low incidence of acute or subacute stent thrombosis. The mid-term results indicate a high rate of angiographic restenosis but a low need of target vessel revascularization. These data suggest that stenting cannot be considered the treatment of choice for unselected lesions located in coronary arteries with a small reference diameter, but represents a safe solution if unsatisfactory results are obtained with balloon angioplasty alone.
Aged↗
Provisional stenting in small vessels.
Based on the currently available data, the strategy of routine stent placement in unselected lesions located in small coronary arteries provides good immediate results but is still associated with a high incidence of in-stent restenosis. Randomized trials comparing elective stenting with balloon angioplasty have not provided the demonstration that routine stenting is the best strategy for percutaneous intervention in coronary arteries with a reference diameter smaller than 2.75-3.0 mm. This paper describes the rationale for provisional stenting in this clinical setting and reviews the role of quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary ultrasound and intracoronary Doppler measurements in the identification of lesions that would benefit from adjunctive stent placement after balloon angioplasty and in guiding stent implantation.
Journal Article↗
Beta-radiation therapy for long lesions in native coronary vessels: a matched comparison between de novo and in-stent restenotic lesions.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and to compare clinical outcome of intracoronary beta-radiation to treat long lesions (>20 mm) in patients with de novo stenosis vs. patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: A matched comparison of 44 patients with 63 de novo lesions and 48 patients with 63 ISR lesions (>20 mm) treated with intracoronary beta-radiation was performed. RESULTS: Stents were implanted in 65.1% of de novo and 19% of ISR lesions (P=.001). Radiation doses delivered were 17.2+/-3.0 vs. 20.3+/-3.0 Gy at 2 mm from the source center for de novo and ISR lesions. There was no difference in the incidence of in-hospital events. Clinical follow-up at 16.4+/-6.7 months showed no difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between de novo and ISR patients (27.3% vs. 25%, P=.8). Late total occlusions (LTOs) occurred in eight patients (four in each group) treated with stents at the time of radiation and after discontinuation of ticlopidine. By multivariate analysis, stent implantation was the only predictor of late occlusions (OR 8.25, 95% CI 1.73-38.46, P<.008). Restenosis rates were similar for de novo and ISR lesions (29.3% vs. 23.2%, P=.46), as well as target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates (22.7% vs. 22.9% and 29.5% vs. 29.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary beta-radiation gives comparable results when used to treat de novo or ISR lesions provided new stent implantation can be avoided. Long-term combined antiplatelet therapy is mandatory for patients who receive new stents at the time of radiation treatment.
Adult↗