Biomedical subjects

Fleur Gossiaux

Publications and source records attributed to Fleur Gossiaux.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Generator replacement in epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation.

PURPOSE: In epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), the occurrence of end of battery life (EOBL), when the generator will no longer deliver any stimulation, was investigated with regard to seizure control. EOBL is preceeded by end of effective stimulation (EOES) when irregular stimulation may occur. METHODS: In 14/78 patients, treated with VNS at Ghent University Hospital, generators were replaced at different times following EOES or EOBL. We retrospectively analysed the time of occurrence of EOES and EOBL and seizure control before and after generator replacement. RESULTS: EOES or EOBL was indicated by loss of seizure control, decreased perception of stimulation and recurrence of depression in 3, 3 and 1/14 patient(s), respectively. In 2 and 1/14 patient(s), EOBL and premature generator failure, respectively, were detected during routine check-up at the epilepsy clinic. In 4/14 patients, generator replacement was performed before estimated EOES. Pre-replacement seizure control could not be regained in 2/14 patients in whom replacement had been postponed for several months. Estimation of EOES and EOBL occurrence proved difficult in individual patients. CONCLUSION: EOES or EOBL may be indicated by loss of seizure control, decreased or irregular perception of stimulation by the patient and loss of other VNS-induced effects. Postponing generator replacement may result into permanent loss of seizure control. In responders we suggest generator replacement before EOBL. Our results call for performance of prospective studies in larger patient groups that may eventually lead to general guidelines on the indication and timing of generator replacement.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Neurostimulation for refractory epilepsy.

Neurostimulation is an emerging treatment for refractory epilepsy. To date the precise mechanism of action remains to be elucidated. Better insight in the mechanism of action may identify seizure types or syndromes that respond to such a treatment and may guide the search for optimal stimulation parameters and finally improve clinical efficacy. In the past ten years some progress has been made through neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical and cerebral blood flow studies in patients and animals undergoing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Interesting results have been found in VNS-treated patients that underwent evoked potential measurements, cerebrospinal fluid investigation, neuropsychological testing and PET, SPECT and fMRI testing. Desynchronisation of abnormal synchronous epileptic activity is one of the hypotheses on the mode of action that might primarily be responsible for an anti-seizure effect. There is however increasing evidence from research and clinical observation that VNS might establish a true and long-term anti-epileptic effect. It has been shown that VNS influences neurotransmission in the brain and provokes long-term changes in cerebral blood flow in areas crucial for epileptogenesis such as the thalamus and medial temporal lobe structures. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for epilepsy has regained interest. Central nervous system structures known to play a key role in the epileptogenic network such as the thalamus and subthalamic nucleus have been targeted. Another approach is to target the ictal onset zone such as the medial temporal lobe. At Ghent University Hospital 10 patients have been treated with long-term amygdalohippocampal DBS. Several hypotheses have been raised for the mechanism of action of DBS for refractory seizures. Seizure reduction may be due to a microlesion caused by electrode insertion or by provoking a reversible functional lesion due to the effect of electrical current on hyperexcitable tissue. Neurophysiological techniques such as evoked potentials monitoring and intraoperative single unit potential recordings may guide correct electrode placement, individual DBS titration and elucidation of the mechanims of action of DBS for epilepsy.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: a transatlantic experience.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an alternative treatment for medically or surgically refractory epilepsy. The long-term efficacy and safety of VNS were evaluated in a large patient series at Ghent University Hospital and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Between March 1995 and February 2003, seizure frequency and type as well as prescribed antiepileptic drugs and side effects were prospectively assessed in 131 patients treated with VNS in either center. Patients with a minimum follow-up duration of 6 months were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. A total of 118 of 131 implanted patients had a minimum postimplantation follow-up period of 6 months (mean, 33 months). The mean age of these patients was 32 years and the mean duration of refractory epilepsy was 22 years. The mean reduction in monthly seizure frequency in all patients was 55% (range, 0-100; SD = 31.6). Seven percent of patients were free of seizures with impaired consciousness, 50% of patients had a seizure frequency reduction of more than 50%, and 21% of patients were nonresponders. Fifteen patients reported stimulation-related side effects such as hoarseness or gagging. In a large patient series from two geographically distinct epilepsy centers located in two different continents, VNS proved to be efficacious and safe during long-term follow-up.

Adolescent↗