PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Frédéric Michard

Publications and source records attributed to Frédéric Michard.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Evaluation of left ventricular function in anesthetized patients using femoral artery dP/dt(max).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare dP/dt(max) estimated from a femoral artery pressure tracing to left ventricular (LV) dP/dt(max) during various alterations in myocardial loading and contractile function. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: All patients were instrumented with a high-fidelity LV catheter, a pulmonary artery catheter, and a femoral arterial catheter. In 40 patients, hemodynamic measurements were performed before and after passive leg raising and before and after calcium administration (5 mg/kg); and in 30 other patients, hemodynamic measurements were performed before and after dobutamine infusion (5 microg/kg/min over 10 minutes). RESULTS: LV and femoral dP/dt(max) were significantly correlated (r = 0.82, p < 0.001), but femoral dP/dt(max) systematically underestimated LV dP/dt(max) (bias = -361 +/- 96 mmHg/s). Passive leg raising induced significant increases in central venous pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure, but femoral dP/dt(max), stroke volume, and LV dP/dt(max) remained unaltered. Calcium administration induced significant and marked increases in LV dP/dt(max) (23% +/- 9%) and femoral dP/dt(max) (37% +/- 14%) associated with a significant increase in stroke volume (9% +/- 2%). Dobutamine infusion also induced significant and marked increases in LV dP/dt(max) (25% +/- 8%) and femoral dP/dt(max) (35% +/- 12%) associated with a significant increase in stroke volume (14% +/- 3%). Overall, a very close linear relationship (r = 0.93) and a good agreement (bias = -5 +/- 17 mmHg/s) were found between changes in LV dP/dt(max) and changes in femoral dP/dt(max). A very close relationship was also observed between changes in LV dP/dt(max) and changes in femoral dP/dt(max) during each intervention (leg raising, calcium administration, and dobutamine infusion). CONCLUSION: Femoral dP/dt(max) underestimated LV dP/dt(max), but changes in femoral dP/dt(max) accurately reflected changes in LV dP/dt(max) during various interventions.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2006

Volume management in critically ill patients: New insights.

In order to turn a fluid challenge into a significant increase in stroke volume and cardiac output, 2 conditions must be met: 1) fluid infusion has to significantly increase cardiac preload and 2) the increase in cardiac preload has to induce a significant increase in stroke volume. In other words, a patient can be nonresponder to a fluid challenge because preload does not increase during fluid infusion or/and because the heart (more precisely, at least 1 of the ventricles) is operating on the flat portion of the Frank-Starling curve. Volumetric markers of cardiac preload are therefore useful for checking whether cardiac preload effectively increases during fluid infusion. If this is not the case, giving more fluid, using a venoconstricting agent (to avoid venous pooling), or reducing the intrathoracic pressure (to facilitate the increase in intrathoracic blood volume) may be useful for achieving increased cardiac preload. Arterial pulse pressure variation is useful for determining whether stroke volume can/will increase when preload does increase. If this is not the case, only an inotropic drug can improve cardiac output. Therefore, the best option for determining the usefulness of, and monitoring fluid therapy in critically ill patients is the combination of information provided by the static indicators of cardiac preload and arterial pulse pressure variation.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2005

Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation.

Mechanical ventilation induces cyclic changes in vena cava blood flow, pulmonary artery blood flow, and aortic blood flow. At the bedside, respiratory changes in aortic blood flow are reflected by "swings" in blood pressure whose magnitude is highly dependent on volume status. During the past few years, many studies have demonstrated that arterial pressure variation is neither an indicator of blood volume nor a marker of cardiac preload but a predictor of fluid responsiveness. That is, these studies have demonstrated the value of this physical sign in answering one of the most common clinical questions, Can we use fluid to improve hemodynamics?, while static indicators of cardiac preload (cardiac filling pressures but also cardiac dimensions) are frequently unable to correctly answer this crucial question. The reliable analysis of respiratory changes in arterial pressure is possible in most patients undergoing surgery and in critically ill patients who are sedated and mechanically ventilated with conventional tidal volumes.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2005

Factors influencing the estimation of extravascular lung water by transpulmonary thermodilution in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors that may influence the estimation of extravascular lung water (EVLW) with a single (cold) indicator compared with assessment using two indicators (thermo-dye dilution). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of an electronic hemodynamic database. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-eight critically ill patients monitored by the thermo-dye dilution technique in the postoperative period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The EVLW was simultaneously assessed by the thermo-dye dilution technique (EVLWref) and estimated by transpulmonary thermodilution (EVLWest). EVLWref index ranged between 1 and 40 mL/kg (mean 10 +/- 7 mL/kg) and EVLWest between 2 and 39 mL/kg (mean 9 +/- 6 mL/kg). EVLWref was closely correlated (r = .96) with EVLWest. The mean difference (bias) between EVLWref and EVLWest was -0.5 +/- 1.9 mL/kg. The bias was not influenced by the weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, Pao2, intrathoracic blood volume, cardiac output, or dosage of vasoactive agents. In contrast, the bias was slightly but significantly influenced by EVLWref, Pao2/Fio2 ratio, tidal volume, and level of positive end-expiratory pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In our surgical intensive care unit population, the estimation of EVLW by transpulmonary thermodilution was influenced by the amount of EVLW, the Pao2/Fio2 ratio, the tidal volume, and the level of positive end-expiratory pressure. However, compared with the double indicator method, transpulmonary thermodilution estimation remained clinically acceptable even in patients with severe lung disease.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter (DeltaD(IVC)) could be related to fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Medical ICU of a non-university hospital. PATIENTS: Mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock (n=39). INTERVENTIONS: Volume loading with 8 mL/kg of 6% hydroxyethylstarch over 20 min. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Cardiac output and DeltaD(IVC) were assessed by echography before and immediately after the standardized volume load. Volume loading induced an increase in cardiac output from 5.7+/-2.0 to 6.4+/-1.9 L/min (P<0.001) and a decrease in DeltaD(IVC) from 13.8+/-13.6 vs 5.2+/-5.8% (P<0.001). Sixteen patients responded to volume loading by an increase in cardiac output > or =15% (responders). Before volume loading, the DeltaD(IVC) was greater in responders than in non-responders (25+/-15 vs 6+/-4%, P<0.001), closely correlated with the increase in cardiac output (r=0.82, P<0.001), and a 12% DeltaD(IVC) cut-off value allowed identification of responders with positive and negative predictive values of 93% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Analysis of DeltaD(IVC) is a simple and non-invasive method to detect fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of the global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) evaluated by transpulmonary thermodilution as an indicator of cardiac preload. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Medical ICU of a university hospital (20 beds). PATIENTS: Thirty-six patients with septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Volume loading and dobutamine infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Hemodynamic parameters were evaluated in triplicate by the transpulmonary thermodilution technique: (1) before and after 66 fluid challenges in 27 patients, and (2) before and after 28 increases in dobutamine infusion rate in 9 patients. Volume loading induced a significant (p < 0.001) increase in central venous pressure (CVP) from 10 +/- 4 to 13 +/- 4 mm Hg, in GEDV index from 711 +/- 164 to 769 +/- 144 mL/m(2), in stroke volume index (SVI) from 36 +/- 12 to 42 +/- 12 mL/m(2), and in cardiac index (CI) from 3.4 +/- 1.1 to 3.9 +/- 1.2 L/min/m(2) (mean +/- SD). Changes in GEDV index were correlated (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) with changes in SVI, while changes in CVP were not. The increase in SVI was > 15% in 32 of 66 instances (positive response). The preinfusion GEDV index was lower (637 +/- 134 mL/m(2) vs 781 +/- 161 mL/m(2), p < 0.001) in the cases of positive response, and was negatively correlated with the percentage increase in GEDV index (r = - 0.65, p < 0.001) and in SVI (r = - 0.5, p < 0.001). Dobutamine infusion induced an increase in SVI (32 +/- 11 mL/m(2) vs 35 +/- 12 mL/m(2), p < 0.05) and in CI (2.8 +/- 0.6 L/min/m(2) vs 3.2 +/- 0.6 L/min/m(2), p < 0.001) but no significant change in CVP (13 +/- 3 mm Hg vs 13 +/- 3 mm Hg) and in GEDV index (823 +/- 221 mL/m(2) vs 817 +/- 202 mL/m(2)). CONCLUSION: In patients with septic shock, our findings demonstrate that, in contrast to CVP, the transpulmonary thermodilution GEDV index behaves as an indicator of cardiac preload.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify and critically review the published peer-reviewed, English-language studies investigating predictive factors of fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. DESIGN: Studies were collected by doing a search in MEDLINE (from 1966) and scanning the reference lists of the articles. Studies were selected according to the following criteria: volume expansion performed in critically ill patients, patients classified in two groups (responders and nonresponders) according to the effects of volume expansion on stroke volume or on cardiac output, and comparison of responder and nonresponder patients' characteristics before volume expansion. RESULTS: Twelve studies were analyzed in which the parameters tested were as follows: (1) static indicators of cardiac preload (right atrial pressure [RAP], pulmonary artery occlusion pressure [PAOP], right ventricular end-diastolic volume [RVEDV], and left ventricular end-diastolic area [LVEDA]); and (2) dynamic parameters (inspiratory decrease in RAP [Delta RAP], expiratory decrease in arterial systolic pressure [Delta down], respiratory changes in pulse pressure [Delta PP], and respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity [Delta Vpeak]). Before fluid infusion, RAP, PAOP, RVEDV, and LVEDA were not significantly lower in responders than in nonresponders in three of five studies, in seven of nine studies, in four of six studies, and in one of three studies, respectively. When a significant difference was found, no threshold value could discriminate responders and nonresponders. Before fluid infusion, Delta RAP, Delta down, Delta PP, and Delta Vpeak were significantly higher in responders, and a threshold value predicted fluid responsiveness with high positive (77 to 95%) and negative (81 to 100%) predictive values. CONCLUSION: Dynamic parameters should be used preferentially to static parameters to predict fluid responsiveness in ICU patients.

Blood Pressure↗