PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Françoise Mornex

Publications and source records attributed to Françoise Mornex.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Feasibility and efficacy of high-dose three-dimensional-conformal radiotherapy in cirrhotic patients with small-size hepatocellular carcinoma non-eligible for curative therapies--mature results of the French Phase II RTF-1 trial.

PURPOSE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a poor prognosis tumor, and only 20% of patients will benefit from curative therapies (surgery, liver transplantation, percutaneous ablation). Although conventional radiotherapy has been traditionally regarded as inefficient and toxic for cirrhotic patients, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) has provided promising preliminary data for the treatment of HCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prospective phase II trial including Child-Pugh A/B cirrhotic patients with small-size HCC (1 nodule < or =5 cm, or 2 nodules < or =3 cm) nonsuitable for curative treatments, to assess tolerance and efficacy of high-dose (66 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction) 3DCRT. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. Among the 25 assessable patients, tumor response was observed for 23 patients (92%), with complete response for 20 patients (80%), and partial response for 3 patients (12%). Stable disease was observed in 2 patients (8%). Grade 4 toxicities occurred in 2 of 11 (22%) Child-Pugh B patients only. Child-Pugh A patients tolerated treatment well, and 3/16 (19%) developed asymptomatic Grade 3 toxicities. CONCLUSION: High-dose 3DCRT is a noninvasive, well-tolerated modality that is highly suitable for the treatment of small HCCs in cirrhotic patients, with promising results. However, additional trials are needed to optimize this technique and formally compare it with the usual curative approaches.

Adult↗

Long-term survival of 106 stage III ovarian cancer patients with minimal residual disease after second-look laparotomy and consolidation radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Attempts to increase survival in stage III ovarian cancer patients with minimal residual disease at second-look laparotomy have included consolidation radiotherapy. We present long-term survival of 106 consecutive patients treated between 1983 and 1993 in 4 French institutions for stage III ovarian adenocarcinoma with first-look debulking, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, second-look surgery with a residual disease <1 cm and consolidation radiotherapy. METHODS: Median age was 52 years. Residual disease after first look surgery was <1 cm for 40.5% of patients. Median number of chemotherapy cycles was 6 (range 4-12). Residual disease <1 cm at second-look laparotomy was observed in 79% of the patients, with 33% of patients in complete histologic remission. Residual disease <1 cm was obtained in all patients after tumor excision during second-look surgery. Radiation was performed using a linear accelerator with a whole abdomen dose of 22.5 Gy, an additional 22 Gy pelvic boost for 71 patients, and an additional 12 Gy lombo-aortic boost for 33 patients. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 14 years. Radiation was stopped for acute toxicity in 11 patients. Long-term toxicities included radiation enteritis in 21 patients with 9 patients requiring surgery for bowel obstruction. Four deaths were related to enteritis complications. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was respectively 53% and 36%. CONCLUSION: This sequential treatment with final consolidation abdominopelvic radiotherapy is an effective treatment for a selected group of stage III ovarian cancer patients with a high intestinal toxicity incidence.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Feasibility of preoperative combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The French SFRO-FFCD 97-04 Phase II trial.

PURPOSE: More than 80% of patients who undergo a potentially curative resection for pancreatic cancer develop local or distant recurrence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might offer potential benefits regarding local and systemic control and survival. This multi-institutional Phase II trial explored the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiation in this situation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment consisted of concurrent radiotherapy (50 Gy within 5 weeks), and chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2)/day, 5 days/week, 5 consecutive weeks) and cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/day, Days 1-5 and 29-33), followed by surgical resection of the pancreatic tumor in patients without progression. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were enrolled. Of these, 38 (93%) received > or =47 Gy; 30 patients (73%) received > or =75% of the prescribed doses of chemotherapy. Surgical resection was performed in 26 patients (63%). Because of local or metastatic progression, 5 patients (12%) did not undergo surgery and 10 underwent surgery without resection of the pancreatic tumor. Operative mortality was 2.8%. Among 40 evaluable patients, 27 were successfully treated (67.5%; 95% CI, 50.9-81.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic cancer is chemo-radiosensitive. The proposed pre-operative scheme is feasible, does not prevent successful surgery, and must be tested on a Phase III setting. Yet, the large proportion of tumor progression during and after chemoradiation justifies the use of more efficient drugs such as Gemcitabine, and optimized radiotherapy including new techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[The role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic cancer].

Although complete surgical resection, when possible, leads to prolonged survival in pancreatic cancer, if used alone, its results remain sub-optimal. Neoadjuvant strategies are recent in pancreatic cancer: in primary resectable tumors, they ensure that all patients obtain additional treatment to complete surgery; in locally advanced tumors, they allow a better selection of candidates for curative resection. By delaying surgery, neoadjuvant strategies modify the initial diagnostic process and the symptomatic treatment of pancreatic cancer. Several recent phase I-II studies have confirmed the feasibility and efficacy of the association of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which is well-tolerated and is associated with better local control and survival. Due to the aggressiveness of pancreatic cancers, most recent cytotoxic agents should be associated with modern radiation techniques. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is under evaluation in pancreatic cancers, and no randomized phase III trials comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapeutic sequences has been reported. Moreover, radiological and pathological evaluations, not only at diagnosis, but also after preoperative chemoradiation, must be standardized to improve the selection of patients who will benefit from this multi-modal treatment.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗

[Chemoradiation therapy: a model for treatment optimization in oncology].

This work aims at describing the wide variety of questions relative to the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer; it shows how the advent of new results induces new questions, as well as the diversity of clinical research directions. Lung cancer represents a model of organization of multimodal therapeutic algorithms, the ultimate aim being the therapeutic optimization of the most frequent cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Randomized phase III trial of sequential chemoradiotherapy compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Groupe Lyon-Saint-Etienne d'Oncologie Thoracique-Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie NPC 95-01 Study.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase III study to compare the survival impact of concurrent versus sequential treatment with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms. In the sequential arm, patients received induction CT with cisplatin (120 mg/m2) on days 1, 29, and 57, and vinorelbine (30 mg/m2/wk) from day 1 to day 78, followed by thoracic RT at a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions (2 Gy per fraction and 5 fractions per week). In the concurrent arm, the same RT was started on day 1 with two concurrent cycles of cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d and etoposide 50 mg/m2/d (days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33); patients then received consolidation therapy with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on days 78 and 106 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2/wk from days 78 to 127. RESULTS: Two hundred five patients were randomly assigned. Pretreatment characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. There were six toxic deaths in the sequential arm and 10 in the concurrent arm. Median survival was 14.5 months in the sequential arm and 16.3 months in the concurrent arm (log-rank test P = .24). Two-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates were better in the concurrent arm (39%, 25%, and 21%, respectively) than in the sequential arm (26%, 19%, and 14%, respectively). Esophageal toxicity was significantly more frequent in the concurrent arm than in the sequential arm (32% v 3%). CONCLUSION: Although not statistically significant, clinically important differences in the median, 2-, 3-, and 4-year survival rates were observed, with a trend in favor of concurrent chemoradiation therapy, suggesting that is the optimal strategy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗

Radiochemotherapy in the management of pancreatic cancer--part I: neoadjuvant treatment.

In pancreatic cancer, complete resection offers the only hope of cure, but results of surgery alone are suboptimal. Many studies have been conducted in which the treatment regimen consists of surgery in combination with radiation and chemotherapy to improve local control and outcome. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a fairly recent approach that appears to be feasible in resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In resectable tumors, chemoradiation therapy has been shown to be at least as effective in a neoadjuvant setting as in an adjuvant setting. Neoadjuvant therapy offers a few theoretical advantages: (1) beginning the multimodality treatment with chemoradiation therapy increases the chance that more patients will receive all of its components; (2) preoperative chemoradiation therapy provides an observation period to exclude from surgical resection those patients with rapidly progressive disease; and (3) in locally advanced tumors, it provides the opportunity for downstaging and infrequently allows patients to undergo resection. To evaluate the scope and applicability of neoadjuvant treatment, a number of areas need to be addressed. First, the definition of locally advanced disease needs to be more adequately standardized because the resectability definition sometimes varies among surgeons. In addition, because imaging examinations may underestimate the effectiveness of preoperative chemoradiation therapy, some researchers have tried to evaluate treatment response via a pathological examination of the tumor specimen; however, complete pathological response appears to be rare. Finally, more efficient novel neoadjuvant approaches are required to address the high metastatic potential of pancreatic cancer. These areas are discussed in depth.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[Concurrent chemoradiation in lung cancer].

Concurrent chemoradiation has become for the 15 last years the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, either as a definite therapy in non resectable tumors, or in a neoadjuvant setting in potentially resectable tumors. Associating sequential and concurrent schedules, by administering chemotherapy before or after concurrent chemoradiation, has been recently investigated, but the best sequence remains a matter of controversy. Increasing local control and survival after definite chemoradiation seems possible not only by using optimized radiation fractionation schedules and escalated total doses, but also by associating more convenient and less toxic chemotherapy agents at the right cytotoxic or radio-sensitizing dose. Moreover, recent data have suggested that surgery following induction chemoradiation is feasible and effective in selected patients without mediastinal nodes involvement, if a complete resection can be performed. In patients with localized small cell lung cancer, early concurrent chemoradiation with platinium and etoposide has been recognized as the state-of-the-art treatment. The increasing number of ongoing trials including modern radiation schedules combined with newer chemotherapy agents shows that chemoradiation is one of the most promising therapeutic strategies in thoracic oncology.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer with high-dose radiation and oxaliplatin-containing regimen: the Lyon R0-04 phase II trial.

PURPOSE: The combination of radiation, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer has been shown to be feasible in a phase I trial. The purpose of this phase II trial was to assess tolerance and efficacy of this regimen in a preoperative setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2000 and October 2001, 40 operable patients were entered onto the study. Radiotherapy was delivered with a three-field technique to a dose of 50 Gy over 5 weeks with a concomitant boost approach. Two cycles of chemotherapy were given synchronously on weeks 1 and 5, with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by 5-day continuous infusion of fluorouracil 350 mg/m(2) and L-folinic acid 100 mg/m(2). Surgery was planned 5 weeks later. RESULTS: All patients completed treatment without modification except one who experienced grade 3/4 toxicity. Grade 3 toxicity was seen in seven patients. Surgery was performed in all patients after a mean interval time of 5 weeks. An objective clinical response was seen in 30 patients (75%). Sphincter-saving surgery was possible in 26 patients. No postoperative deaths occurred. In four patients (10%), a reoperation was necessary (anastomotic fistula, n = 2; pelvic abscess, n = 2). In six cases the operative specimen was sterilized (15%), and in 12 cases (30%), only few residual cells were detected. CONCLUSION: Such a combined preoperative chemoradiotherapy and oxaliplatin-containing regimen is well tolerated with no increase in surgical toxicity. The good response rate observed warrants its use in further clinical trials.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[Combined gemcitabine and radiotherapy].

Gemcitabine is a molecule presenting with major radiosensitizing or radio-potentiator capacities. This property has been extensively studied in vitro, with clinical therapeutic implications. Chemotherapy and radiation are very often used together, most of the time concurrently. This review analyses the results obtained with combined gemcitabine and radiation, for non small cell lung cancer, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, head and neck and uterine cervix carcinomas. Several therapeutic schemes are presented, for each tumor location. A description of the toxicities observed is presented, including the recall phenomenon description. Promising results justify the numerous current trials, as well as enthusiasm initiated by this therapeutic association.

Adenocarcinoma↗