PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Frances A Campbell

Publications and source records attributed to Frances A Campbell.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Reduction of opioid-withdrawal symptoms with quetiapine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of quetiapine in a population undergoing ambulatory detoxification from opioids. METHOD: Medications utilized in our outpatient clinic for opioid withdrawal were evaluated for quality-assurance purposes. The treatment regimen generally included clonidine, hydroxyzine, trazodone, diphenoxylate/atropine, and sometimes chlordiazepoxide. Patients were also initially given eight 25-mg tablets of quetiapine and instructed to take 1 or 2 tablets every 4 hours as needed for symptoms of withdrawal or craving (with a maximum daily dose of 200 mg). Data were based on patient evaluations from June 2003 to June 2004. RESULTS: 41% of all patients (N = 213) successfully completed the detoxification phase of the program (i.e., completed at least 5 days of abstinence). A medication questionnaire was instituted for quality-assurance purposes after some apparent initial success with quetiapine. A retrospective analysis of these data revealed that, of the 107 patients evaluated for medication response, 79 reported that quetiapine helped reduce craving for opioids, 52 reported that quetiapine helped reduce their anxiety, 24 reported a reduction in somatic pain, 22 reported that quetiapine helped alleviate insomnia, and 14 reported an improved appetite. Four individuals did not feel quetiapine had any benefit, and another 7 were unable to tolerate quetiapine because of side effects. The quetiapine dose used ranged from 25 to 600 mg/day (mean +/- SD dose = 206 +/- 122 mg/day). CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine use during opioid cessation was found to help abate symptoms of opioid withdrawal in our patient population and was generally well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations.

A randomized trial comparing the amount of knowledge orally recalled from four different presentations of the same consent information was conducted in a non-clinic sample of 233 low-income parents who displayed a range of reading comprehension skill. The study simulated recruitment of children into one of two actual studies underway at another location: one involved high risk to participants, the other did not. Use of a non-clinic sample controlled for prior knowledge of the conditions, and avoiding discussion of the information further assured that differences in recalled information could be attributed more confidently to the format itself. The formats included the original written forms, enhanced print (simpler language, topic headings, pictures), narrated videotapes, and self-paced PowerPoint presentations via laptop computer with bulleted print information, pictures, and narration. No format-related differences in recalled information were found in the full sample but for the 124 individuals with reading comprehension scores at or below the 8th grade level, the enhanced print version tended to be more effective than either the original form or the video. Across all formats, more information was recalled about the low-risk study. The findings emphasize the necessity for clinicians and researchers to verify understanding of consent information, especially when there is risk of reduced literacy skill. Reliance on video to convey information in preference to well-done print media appeared questionable.

Adult↗