PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Frances Chung

Publications and source records attributed to Frances Chung.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Factors affecting recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgery.

PURPOSE: Recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgery are important components of the ambulatory surgery experience. This review provides contemporary perspectives on the issues of discharge criteria, fast-tracking, patient escort requirements, and driving after ambulatory anesthesia. SOURCE: A search was performed in the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, MEDLINE(R), EMBASE(R), CINAHL, and PsycINFO, to review factors delaying discharge following ambulatory surgery. The following subject headings were used: "ambulatory surgery, discharge, recovery, car driving, escort, transport, fast tracking, patient discharge, recovery, transportation of patients, hospital discharge, recovery room, patient transport, hospital discharge, recovery room, anesthetic recovery, patient transport, ambulatory surgical procedures, patient discharge, recovery of function, automobile driving, patient escort service, recovery room". Using the same search engines, the following keywords were used: "fast tracking, recovery, and discharge". PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The current literature supports that discharge scoring systems may be useful to guide discharge following ambulatory surgery. While fast-tracking has become common in some centres, further studies are required to justify more routine implementation of this practice in the management of patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Patients at low risk for urinary retention can be discharged home without voiding. Patients should not drive until at least 24 hr postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring rapid postoperative recovery and safe discharge following ambulatory surgery are important components of the ambulatory surgical program. A clearly defined process should be established for each ambulatory surgical unit to ensure the safe and timely discharge of patients after anesthesia, in accordance with current best evidence.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2006

Outcomes in day surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize and examine the updated published results on the outcome measures that can be used to assess the quality of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Major morbidity and mortality following ambulatory surgery is exceedingly low. Cancellations and delays may have a negative impact on the patients, healthcare personnel and the organizations. Minor cardiovascular adverse events are the most common intraoperatively and are associated with preexisting cardiovascular diseases and elderly patients. Respiratory events postoperatively are associated with obesity, smoking and asthma. Also, pain is a common cause for longer postoperative stay, unanticipated admission and readmission. Postoperative nausea and vomiting occurs in 30% of patients and strongly affects patient satisfaction. Furthermore, prolonged stays are mainly caused by surgical factors, or minor symptoms like pain or nausea. Surgical factors are also the main causes of unanticipated hospital admission. The type of surgery and the 24 h postoperative symptoms may affect the degree of return to daily living function. Also, patient satisfaction affects the outcome of healthcare and the use of healthcare services. SUMMARY: Ambulatory surgery, as currently practiced, provides quality care that is cost-effective. Minor adverse events such as pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting are still common, and improvement could be targeted in these areas.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacy access to emergency contraception in California.

CONTEXT: California is one of eight states that allow a woman to obtain emergency contraceptives from a pharmacy without a physician prescription. Because many women do not know about emergency contraception or direct pharmacy access, it is important to understand barriers to getting the method and women's reasons for choosing the pharmacy option. METHODS: In a 2004 survey at 25 predominantly independent pharmacies across California that offered pharmacy access, 426 women completed questionnaires after obtaining emergency contraceptives. They were asked about their reasons for seeking the method, the time of unprotected intercourse, barriers to access, how they learned about pharmacy access and their reasons for choosing it. Chi-square tests and analysis of variance were used to assess differences between subgroups. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of women wanted emergency contraceptives for immediate use, and women obtained the method an average of 36 hours after unprotected intercourse. Those younger than 16, those who had had unprotected sex on the weekend and those who were embarrassed to ask for the method or who did not know about it all took a longer time to get the medication than did their respective comparison groups. Women who chose pharmacy access did so because they thought it was faster (54%) and more convenient (47%) than seeking a physician prescription. The majority reported that talking to a pharmacist was very helpful (84%) and that it was very important to be able to get the method directly from a pharmacy (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing women's knowledge about emergency contraception and its availability directly from pharmacies has the potential to improve the effectiveness of this contraceptive method by reducing the time interval between unprotected intercourse and initiation of treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Vital capacity and patient controlled sevoflurane inhalation result in similar induction characteristics.

PURPOSE: To compare patient controlled inhalational induction (PCI) with the most commonly used sevoflurane induction technique, vital capacity inhalational induction (VCI). METHODS: Following approval of the Research Ethics Board, 124 outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy were randomly assigned to receive either PCI or VCI sevoflurane followed by laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion and sevoflurane maintenance. In the PCI group, the circle circuit was not primed. The patients were asked to hold the facemask themselves and breathe normally with sevoflurane 8% in oxygen at a flow rate of 4 L x min(-1). In the VCI group, the circle circuit was primed and patients were asked to take vital capacity breaths with sevoflurane 8% at an oxygen flow rate of 8 L x min(-1). The LMA was inserted as soon as the patient's jaw was relaxed. Time from induction to LMA insertion was recorded and insertion conditions rated. The amount of sevoflurane used for LMA insertion was calculated. Vital signs were monitored at one-minute intervals until ten minutes after LMA insertion. RESULTS: Demographic data were comparable. There were no differences with respect to LMA insertion time (PCI - 3.4 min vs VCI - 3.3 min), laryngospasm (PCI - 7% vs VCI - 5%), mean arterial pressure, heart rate, SaO(2) as well as patient's overall satisfaction. CONCLUSION: PCI was comparable to VCI in sevoflurane induction with respect to the speed of induction, side effects during induction and patient satisfaction. However, PCI requires no special training and is widely applicable to all patient populations.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Cognitive function is minimally impaired after ambulatory surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the magnitude of subjective cognitive failure in the three days following general anesthesia (GA) for ambulatory surgery. METHODS: After Research Ethics Board approval, 258 patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA) and 250 patients scheduled for local anesthesia (LA) were recruited from our ambulatory surgical unit. Following the method of Tzabar, Asbury and Millar, patients were asked to complete the cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) before their procedure (with respect to the previous three days) and on the third postoperative day (with respect to their recovery period). RESULTS: General anesthesia and LA groups were similar in demographic make-up, except that the LA group contained more patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I (64.5% vs 52.7%, P < 0.05) and had significantly shorter procedure duration (25 vs 51 min, P < 0.01) than the GA group. Median preoperative CFQ scores (interquartile range) were 26 (18) for the LA group and 26 (18) for the GA group. Postoperative CFQ scores were 25 (20) for the LA group and 28 (22) for the GA group. There was no significant difference in preoperative CFQ score between groups (Mann-Whitney U). When preoperative and postoperative CFQ scores were compared, the small increase seen in the GA group was statistically significant (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon). CONCLUSION: A statistically significant impairment of cognitive function in the three days following GA, but not LA was found. However, the magnitude of this impairment was small, and is of doubtful clinical significance. Modern ambulatory anesthesia may cause less delayed cognitive impairment than was previously thought.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Frequency and implications of ambulatory surgery without a patient escort.

PURPOSE: A study was undertaken to identify the characteristics and outcomes of ambulatory surgical patients without an escort. CLINICAL FEATURES: During a 38-month period, the incidence of patients without an escort at one tertiary care institution was 0.2% (60/28,391). Five patients had their surgery cancelled. The other 55 patients had their surgery performed. Two groups of patients without an escort were identified: patients who were known not to have an escort preoperatively, and patients with "no show" escort. The number of patients with no show escort is much higher than the number of patients who were known not to have an escort preoperatively. The outcome of the no escort patients was compared with the matched control group of patients with an escort. There were no differences in the rates of unanticipated admission, emergency visits or read-mission into the hospital within 30 days comparing the group of patients with and without an escort. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of an escort in ambulatory surgical patients occurs in 0.2% of surgeries, and varies according to the type of service. The number of patients with no show escort is higher than the number of patients with known no escort preoperatively.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

What is the driving performance of ambulatory surgical patients after general anesthesia?

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgical patients are advised to refrain from driving for 24 h postoperatively. However, currently there is no strong evidence to show that driving skills and alertness have resumed in patients by 24 h after general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to determine whether impaired driver alertness had been restored to normal by 2 and 24 h after general anesthesia in patients who underwent ambulatory surgery. METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent left knee arthroscopic surgery were studied. Their driving simulation performance, electroencephalographically verified parameters of sleepiness, subjective assessment of sleepiness, fatigue, alertness, and pain were measured preoperatively and 2 and 24 h postoperatively. The same measurements were performed in a matched control group of 20 healthy individuals. RESULTS: Preoperatively, patients had significantly higher attention lapses and lower alertness levels versus normal controls. Significantly impaired driving skills and alertness, including longer reaction time, higher occurrence of attention lapses, and microsleep intrusions, were found 2 h postoperatively versus preoperatively. No significantly differences were found in any driving performance parameters or electroencephalographically verified parameters 24 h postoperatively versus preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients showed lower alertness levels and impaired driving skills preoperatively and 2 h postoperatively. Based on driving simulation performance and subjective assessments, patients are safe to drive 24 h after general anesthesia.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed2005

Patient selection in ambulatory surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the evidence regarding decisions made in the perioperative management of patients undergoing ambulatory surgery for the following: the elderly, hyper-reactive airways disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes, obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, the ex-premature infant and the child with an upper respiratory infection. RECENT FINDINGS: Major morbidity and mortality following ambulatory surgery is exceedingly low. Minor adverse cardiac events during the intraoperative period are associated with hypertension and the elderly. Minor adverse respiratory events during the intraoperative period are associated with obesity. Respiratory events during the postoperative period are associated with obesity, smoking and asthma. Prolonged stays following ambulatory surgery are predominantly caused by surgical factors or minor symptoms such as pain or nausea. Surgical factors are also the main causes of unplanned admissions. Age greater than 85, significant co-morbidity and multiple admissions to hospital in the 6 months preceding ambulatory surgery, however, are associated with higher readmission rates. SUMMARY: Evidence indicates that ambulatory anesthesia is currently very safe. Ambulatory surgery, however, is being offered to a population with increasing co-morbidity. As the population undergoing ambulatory surgery changes over time, the evidence regarding patient outcomes will need re-examination.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2004

Patient-controlled transdermal fentanyl hydrochloride vs intravenous morphine pump for postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine is commonly used to provide acute postoperative pain control after major surgery. The fentanyl hydrochloride patient-controlled transdermal system eliminates the need for venous access and complicated programming of pumps. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of an investigational patient-controlled iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl hydrochloride compared with a standard intravenous morphine patient-controlled pump. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective randomized controlled parallel-group trial conducted between September 2000 and March 2001 at 33 North American hospitals, enrolling 636 adult patients who had just undergone major surgery. INTERVENTIONS: In surgical recovery rooms, patients were randomly assigned to intravenous morphine (1-mg bolus every 5 minutes; maximum of 10 mg/h) by a patient-controlled analgesia pump (n = 320) or iontophoretic fentanyl hydrochloride (40- microg infusion over 10 minutes) by a patient-controlled transdermal system (n = 316). Supplemental analgesia (morphine or fentanyl intravenous boluses) was administered as needed before and for the first 3 hours after activation of the PCA treatments. Patients then used the PCA treatments without additional analgesics for up to 72 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy variable was patient global assessment of the method of pain control during the first 24 hours. Additional efficacy measures were the proportion of patients discontinuing the study because of inadequate analgesia for any reason, patient-reported pain intensity scores on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), and patient global assessments at 48 and 72 hours. Adverse effects were also recorded. RESULTS: Ratings of good or excellent after 24 hours of treatment for the method of pain control were given by 73.7% of patients (233/316) who used transdermal fentanyl PCA and 76.9% of patients (246/320) who used intravenous morphine PCA; treatment difference was -3.2% (95% confidence interval, -9.9% to 3.5%; P =.36). Early patient discontinuations (25.9% fentanyl vs 25.0% morphine; P =.78) and last pain intensity scores (32.7 fentanyl vs 31.1 morphine on the VAS; P =.45) were not different between the 2 treatments. With continued treatment for up to 48 or 72 hours, more than 80% of patient assessments in each treatment group were good or excellent. The incidence of opioid-related adverse events was similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: An investigational PCA transdermal system using iontophoresis to deliver fentanyl provided postsurgical pain control equivalent to that of a standard intravenous morphine regimen delivered by a PCA pump.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2004

Ambulatory surgery adult patient selection criteria - a survey of Canadian anesthesiologists.

PURPOSE: An increasing number of patients with complex medical problems are now considered suitable for ambulatory surgery. The purpose of this study was to identify the current clinical practice of ambulatory surgical patient selection. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire specifying 30 clinical conditions was sent to all practicing anesthesiologists who are members of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society. Recipients were asked to indicate if they would provide ambulatory anesthesia (yes/no answers) for an adult patient with each of those isolated conditions. A 75% agreement was considered a majority opinion. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred thirty-seven questionnaires were sent and 774 replies were received (57.8%). Over 75% of anesthesiologists were willing to include in their selection criteria American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status III, patients with low-grade angina pectoris (AP) and congestive heart failure (CHF), prior myocardial infarction, asymptomatic valvular disease, sleep apnea without use of narcotics, morbid obesity (MO) without co-morbidities, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptible patients. Over 75% of responders found ASA IV patients, high grade AP and CHF, sleep apnea with postoperative narcotics, MO with co-morbidities and no patient escort to be unsuitable for ambulatory anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Our survey demonstrated that medical conditions with extreme grades of severity (mild or severe) are associated with majority opinion to proceed or not to proceed with ambulatory surgery. Issues with over 75% agreement reflect the common practice. Similar surveys may form a part of patient selection guidelines development in the future.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Patient selection in ambulatory anesthesia - an evidence-based review: part I.

PURPOSE: To identify and characterize the evidence supporting decisions made in the care of patients with selected medical conditions undergoing ambulatory anesthesia and surgery. Conditions highlighted in this review include: the elderly, heart transplantation, hyper-reactive airway disease, coronary artery disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. SOURCE: A structured search of MEDLINE (1966-2003) was performed using keywords for ambulatory surgery and patient condition. Selected articles were assigned a level of evidence using Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) criteria. Recommendations were also graded using CEBM criteria. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The elderly may safely undergo ambulatory surgery but are at increased risk for hemodynamic variation in the operating room. The heart transplant recipient is at increased risk of coronary artery disease and renal insufficiency and should undergo careful preoperative evaluation. The patient with reactive airway disease is at increased risk of minor respiratory complications and should be encouraged to quit smoking. The patient with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial infarction may undergo ambulatory surgery without stress testing if functional capacity is adequate. The patient with obstructive sleep apnea is at increased risk of difficult tracheal intubation but the likelihood of airway obstruction and apnea following ambulatory surgery is unknown. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory anesthesia is infrequently associated with adverse outcomes, however, knowledge regarding specific patient conditions is of generally low quality. Few prospective trials are available to guide management decisions.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Patient selection in ambulatory anesthesia - an evidence-based review: part II.

PURPOSE: This is the second of two reviews evaluating the management of patients with selected medical conditions undergoing ambulatory anesthesia and surgery. Conditions highlighted in this review include: diabetes mellitus; morbid obesity; the ex-premature infant; the child with an upper respiratory infection; malignant hyperthermia; and the use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. SOURCE: Medline search strategies and the framework for the evaluation of clinical evidence are presented in Part I. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Diabetes mellitus has not been linked with adverse events following ambulatory surgery. The morbidly obese patient is at an increased risk for minor respiratory complications in the perioperative period but these events do not increase unanticipated admissions. The ex-premature infant may be considered for ambulatory surgery if post-conceptual age is > 60 weeks and hematocrit is > 30%. The child with a recent upper respiratory tract infection is at an increased risk for perioperative respiratory complications, particularly if endotracheal intubation is required. Patients with malignant hyperthermia may undergo outpatient surgery but require four hours of postoperative temperature monitoring. Sporadic cases of drug interactions have been reported when meperidine and indirect-acting catecholamines are administered in the presence of monamine oxidase inhibitors. Ambulatory anesthesia and surgery is safe if these combinations of drugs are avoided. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory anesthesia can be performed in, and is being offered to, a variety of patients with significant coexistent disease. In many cases there is little evidence documenting the outcomes expected in such patients. Prospective observational and interventional trials are required to better define perioperative management.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Thirty percent of patients have moderate to severe pain 24 hr after ambulatory surgery: a survey of 5,703 patients.

PURPOSE: Postoperative pain is the commonest reason for delayed discharge and unanticipated hospital admission after ambulatory surgery. We investigated the severity of pain at 24 hr postoperatively and determined the most painful procedures. The need for further medical advice and clarity of postoperative analgesia instructions were also studied. METHODS: Five thousand seven hundred and three ambulatory surgical patients were telephoned 24 hr postoperatively. Patients graded their pain using the ten-point self-assessing verbal scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain). Data were analyzed in two groups, those with moderate to severe pain (pain score 4-10) and those with no or mild pain (0-3). RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients (1,495/5,703) had moderate to severe pain. Microdiscectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, shoulder surgery, elbow/hand surgery, ankle surgery, inguinal hernia repair, and knee surgery were identified as the procedures causing most pain at 24 hr. 13.2% of patients needed medical advice by telephone, 1.4% made an unplanned visit to a doctor while the rate of readmission to the hospital was 0.08%. Ninety-eight percent found postoperative instruction sheets and advice helpful. Eighty-eight percent of patients indicated that analgesic instructions were absolutely clear. CONCLUSION: This study has identified the more painful common ambulatory surgical procedures which will allow take home analgesia to be tailored according to individual procedures. Further improvement in analgesic instructions may help in better pain management of ambulatory surgery patients.

Aftercare↗
PubMed2004

Controlled-release codeine is equivalent to acetaminophen plus codeine for post-cholecystectomy analgesia.

PURPOSE: Following ambulatory surgery, long-acting analgesics may provide advantages over short-acting analgesics. This study compared controlled-release codeine (CC) and acetaminophen plus codeine (A/C; 300 mg/30 mg) for pain control in the 48-hr period following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to CC or A/C in a double-blind, double-dummy parallel group study. Unrelieved pain in hospital was treated with fentanyl i.v. bolus. Pain [100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)] was assessed before the first dose of medication; at 0.5, one, two, three, and four hours post-dose; at discharge; and three times a day for 48 hr. Adverse events were recorded and measures of patient satisfaction were assessed at the end of the study. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study; 42 patients in each group. There were no statistically significant differences between CC and A/C treatment. Mean VAS baseline pain was similar in both groups (P = 0.49) and there was no significant difference in the time to onset of analgesia (P = 0.17). At 0.5 hr, the mean VAS pain score was significantly reduced from baseline in both groups (P = 0.0001). The VAS pain scores at discharge were reduced 59% and 56% from baseline, respectively (P = 0.61). There was no difference between treatments in the incidence of adverse events and patients reported similar levels of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled-release codeine provides an equivalent onset of analgesia, reduction in postoperative pain, and level of patient satisfaction, to acetaminophen plus codeine, over 48 hr following cholecystectomy, with the advantage of less frequent dosing.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed2004

Pain management in ambulatory surgery.

Successful ambulatory surgery is dependent on analgesia that is effective, has minimal adverse effects, and can be safely managed by the patient at home after discharge. A number of studies have identified that the provision of effective postoperative analgesia is inadequate for a significant proportion of patients. The following discussion details the current available analgesic options for ambulatory surgery patients and the rationale for their use. Preemptive analgesia should be given to all patients unless there are specific contraindications. Consideration should be given to the use of long-acting oral COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and long-acting oral opioids to treat postoperative pain. A standardized multimodal postdischarge analgesic regimen tailored to the patient's expected postoperative pain levels should be prescribed. Patient follow-up by telephone questionnaire will confirm those surgical procedures that result in mild or moderate-to-severe postoperative pain and the effectiveness of treatment plans.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2004

Dose-response relationship between opioid use and adverse effects after ambulatory surgery.

This health outcomes analysis based on data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial determined dose-response relationship between opioid use and related symptoms. All patients received intravenous fentanyl on demand for pain predischarge, and oral acetaminophen 500 mg/hydrocodone 5 mg every 4-6 hours as needed postdischarge for up to 7 days postsurgery. Patients completed an opioid-related Symptom Distress Scale (SDS) questionnaire every 24 hours postdischarge for 7 days, which assessed 12 opioid-related symptoms by 3 ordinal measures: frequency, severity, and bothersomeness. Clinically meaningful events (CMEs) were defined based on the responses to this questionnaire. Opioid use was converted to morphine equivalent dose (MED). The dose-response relationship between composite SDS scores and MED on Day 1, on Days 0 and 1, and on Days 1-4, was assessed. SDS scores for all 12 symptoms within the 3 dimensions were significantly associated with MED on Day 1 (F-value=1.56; P=0.04), as well as cumulative MED used on Days 0 and 1 (F-value=1.85; P<0.01). Patients with a specific CME used a higher MED than those without a CME on Day 1 (P<0.001). Between Days 1 and 4, patients with a higher number of patient-CME-days used a significantly higher MED. Regression analyses suggested that once the MED reached a threshold, approximately every 4 mg increase in MED was related to 1 additional patient-CME-day (P<0.01). A dose-response relationship empirically exists between MED and directly assessed opioid-related CMEs after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Once daily MED reaches a threshold, every 3-4 mg increase will be associated with 1 additional clinically meaningful opioid-related symptom, or 1 additional patient-day with an opioid-related CME.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Combined topical and intracameral anesthesia in penetrating keratoplasty.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) is either retrobulbar or peribulbar anesthesia combined with seventh cranial nerve akinesia or general anesthesia. These methods are known to be associated with rare but potentially serious adverse ocular and systemic events. PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of combined topical and intracameral anesthesia in addition to intravenous sedation for repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). SETTING: Tertiary-care university hospital. METHODS: In this prospective study, combined topical tetracaine 0.5% and 0.2 cc intracameral 1% lidocaine along with i.v. sedation with midazolam and fentanyl were used for patients undergoing repeat PKP in 15 eyes of 15 selected patients. The indication for surgery was failed corneal graft. Verbal pain scale (VPS, 0-3) was recorded preoperatively, intraoperatively at 3 time-points (after trephination, after placing 8 interrupted sutures, and after placing the running suture), and postoperatively (1 hour postoperatively, overnight pain, and 1 day postoperatively). Patient and surgeon satisfaction were assessed postoperatively using a scale (1-5). After surgery patients were asked for their preferences comparing the current use of topical anesthesia compared with retrobulbar anesthesia used for their initial PKP. RESULTS: The mean intraoperative VPS score was 0.51 +/- 0.32 (range 0-1.33), and the mean postoperative VPS score was 0.47 +/- 0.50 (range 0-1.67). There were no serious intraoperative or postoperative complications. All patients reported high mean satisfaction score of 4.67 +/- 0.49 (range 4-5). The mean satisfaction score reported by the surgeon was 4.47 +/- 0.63 (range 3-5). All patients but 1 (93.3%) preferred combined topical over retrobulbar anesthesia, which they had in their previous surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We found combined topical and intracameral anesthesia to be safe and effective in our selected group of patients undergoing repeat PKP, and it may provide a satisfactory alternative anesthetic modality for patients in whom general, retrobulbar, or peribulbar anesthesia may be contraindicated.

Adult↗