PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Francesco Faletra

Publications and source records attributed to Francesco Faletra.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Is the left ventricular lateral wall the best lead implantation site for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Short-term hemodynamic studies consistently report greater effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients stimulated from a LV lateral coronary sinus tributary (CST) compared to a septal site. The aim of the study was to compare the long-term efficacy of CRT when performed from different LV stimulation sites. From October 1999 to April 2002, 158 patients (mean age 65 years, mean LVEF 0.29, mean QRS width 174 ms) underwent successful CRT, from the anterior (A) CST in 21 patients, the anterolateral (AL) CST in 37 patients, the lateral (L) CST in 57 patients, the posterolateral (PL) CST in 40 patients, and the middle cardiac vein (MCV) CST in 3 patients. NYHA functional class, 6-minute walk test, and echocardiographic measurements were examined at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Comparisons were made among all pacing sites or between lateral and septal sites by grouping AL + L + PL CST as lateral site (134 patients, 85%) and A + MC CST as septal site (24 patients, 15%). In patients stimulated from lateral sites, LVEF increased from 0.30 to 0.39 (P < 0.0001), 6-minute walk test from 323 to 458 m (P < 0.0001), and the proportion of NYHA Class III-IV patients decreased from 82% to 10% (P < 0.0001). In patients stimulated from septal sites, LVEF increased from 0.28 to 0.41 (P < 0.0001), 6-minute walk test from 314 to 494 m (P < 0.0001), and the proportion of NYHA Class III-IV patients decreased from 75% to 23% (P < 0.0001). A significant improvement in cardiac function and increase in exercise capacity were observed over time regardless of the LV stimulation sites, either considered singly or grouped as lateral versus septal sites.

Aged↗

Beneficial effects of biventricular pacing in patients with a "narrow" QRS.

Congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with LBBB and QRS duration > 150 ms are considered the best candidates to biventricular pacing (Biv-P). However, patients with a narrow (120-150 ms) QRS may also benefit from Biv-P since true ventricular dyssynchrony may be underestimated by considering only QRS enlargement. From October 1999 to April 2002, 158 CHF patients (121 men, mean age 65 years, mean LVEF 0.29, mean QRS width 174 ms) underwent successful Biv-P implantation and were then followed for a mean time of 11.2 months. According to basal QRS duration, patients were divided in two groups, with wide QRS (> or = 150 ms, 128 patients, 81%) and with narrow QRS (< 150 ms, 30 patients, 19%). In the wide QRS group, LVEF improved from 29% to 39% (P < 0.0001), 6-minute walk test from 311 to 463 m (P < 0.0001), while NYHA Class III-IV patients decreased from 86% to 8% (P < 0.0001). In the narrow QRS group LVEF improved from 30% to 38% (P < 0.0001), 6-minute walk test from 370 to 506 m (P < 0.0001), and NYHA Class III-IV patients decreased from 60% to 0% (P < 0.0001). The data showed that in wide and narrow QRS patients, Biv-P significantly improved clinical parameters (NYHA class, 6-minute walk test, quality-of-life, and hospitalization rate) and main echocardiographic indicators. Furthermore, narrow QRS patients had a better survival rate, rapidly regained left ventricular function, and only a few patients remained in a higher NYHA class during follow-up. These patients should not be excluded "a priori" from cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Aged↗

Is the outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy related to the underlying etiology?

This study was designed to examine the importance of the underlying cardiac pathology on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), hypothesizing that myocardial infarction scar and other noncontractile segments represent limitations to the ability to resynchronize cardiac contraction in patients with congestive heart failure associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. From October 1999 to April 2002, 158 patients (mean age 65 years, 121 men) were included in a single center, longitudinal, comparative study. All patients had dilated cardiomyopathy and indications for CRT with a mean QRS duration of 174 ms. The patient population was divided into a coronary artery disease (CAD) group that included patients with significant CAD, and no indication, or a contraindication for revascularization, and a non-CAD group that included patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomypopathy. Follow-up data were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. The median follow-up was 11.2 months. In the CAD group, the LVEF increased from 0.29 to 0.34 (P < 0.0001), the 6-minute walk test distance increased from 310 to 463 m (P < 0.0001), and the percentage of patients in NYHA functional Class III-IV decreased from 83% to 23% (P = 0.04). In the non-CAD group, LVEF increased from 29% to 42% (P < 0.0001), the 6-minute walk test distance increased from 332 to 471 m (P < 0.0001), and the percentage of patients in NYHA functional Class III-IV decreased from 79% to 5%, (P < 0.0001). Comparison of the two groups showed that patients in the non-CAD group had a significantly greater increase in LVEF (P = 0.007) and decrease in NYHA class (P < 0.05). Patients with CAD or non-CAD significantly improved clinically during CRT. Non-CAD patients had a greater increase in LVEF and decrease in NYHA functional class than patients with CAD.

Aged↗

Iatrogenic aortic dissection during coronary intervention.

Iatrogenic acute dissection of the ascending aorta following coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention is rare. Localized aortic dissections have been treated by sealing the entry with a coronary stent. Extensive dissections may require a surgical intervention. We describe a coronary dissection with retrograde extension to the ascending aorta that occurred during angioplasty of the right coronary artery. The extensive dissection, which was limited to the ascending aorta, was successfully treated by stenting of the right coronary artery and monitoring the aortic dissection by means of transesophageal echocardiography.

Aortic Dissection↗

[Mitral insufficiency].

Over the past 15 years, outcome of patients with severe mitral insufficiency is significantly improved. This may be due to concomitant advances in many fields of medicine such as a more effective diagnosis and left ventricular function monitoring by means of echocardiography, development of useful guidelines and advances in valve reconstruction techniques. We will discuss some aspects of mitral anatomy, pathophysiology, echocardiographic diagnosis and the proper timing for surgical intervention.

Heart Ventricles↗