PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Francis L Delmonico

Publications and source records attributed to Francis L Delmonico.

46 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Financial incentives for cadaver organ donation: an ethical reappraisal.

A panel of ethicists, organ procurement organization executives, physicians, and surgeons was convened by the sponsorship of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons to determine whether an ethically acceptable pilot trial could be proposed to provide a financial incentive for a family to consent to the donation of organs from a deceased relative. An ethical methodology was developed that could be applied to any proposal for monetary compensation to elucidate its ethical acceptability. An inverse relationship between financial incentives for increasing the families' consent for cadaver donation that clearly would be ethically acceptable (e.g., a contribution to a charity chosen by the family or a reimbursement for funeral expenses) and those approaches that would more likely increase the rate of donation (e.g., direct payment or tax incentive) was evident. The panel was unanimously opposed to the exchange of money for cadaver donor organs because either a direct payment or tax incentive would violate the ideal standard of altruism in organ donation and unacceptably commercialize the value of human life by commodifying donated organs. However, a majority of the panel members supported reimbursement for funeral expenses or a charitable contribution as an ethically permissible approach. The panel concluded that the concept of the organ as a gift could be sustained by a funeral reimbursement or charitable contribution that conveyed the appreciation of society to the family for their donation. Depending on the amount of reimbursement provided for funeral expenses, this approach could be ethically distinguished from a direct payment, by their intrusion into the realm of altruism and voluntariness. We suggest that a pilot project be conducted to determine whether this kind of a financial incentive would be acceptable to the public and successful in increasing organ donation.

Cadaver↗
PubMed2002

Transplant tumor registry: donors with central nervous system tumors1.

BACKGROUND: Despite 13,000 central nervous system (CNS) tumor deaths per year in the United States, CNS tumor donors comprise only 1% of cadaveric donors recovered per year. Concern about tumor transmission may be a possible reason for this very small percentage. Both the size of the candidate waiting list and the number of deaths on the waiting list are progressively increasing because of the donor shortage. METHODS: During a 96-month period, the United Network for Organ Sharing recorded 42,340 cadaver donors of whom 397 had a past history of a CNS tumor or the cause of death listed as a CNS tumor. A total of 1,220 organs were transplanted from these 397 donors. All recipients who reported a posttransplant malignancy during a mean follow-up of 36 months were identified. RESULTS: There was no difference in patient survival of organs from CNS tumor donors when compared to donors with no CNS tumors. CNS tumor donors were not used more often for either urgent or older recipients. A total of 39 patients reported posttransplant malignancies but none of these tumors were donor-derived. There is a wide variation in the number of CNS tumor donors utilized by individual organ procurement organizations. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of tumor transmission from donors with CNS malignancies seems to be small. Certain tumors, such as glioblastoma multiforme and medulloblastoma, carry a high risk of transmission and should be avoided. The risk of tumor transmission should be weighed against the risk of the patient dying on the waiting list without a transplant.

Cadaver↗
PubMed2002

The use of a minor as a live kidney donor.

An analysis of the UNOS database suggests a practice pattern that uses live minor kidney donors in clinical circumstances not endorsed by the recommendations of a recent consensus conference on live organ donation. These data reveal that minor donor kidneys were transplanted more frequently to adult than to pediatric recipients, that only 12% of all recipients were identical twins, and that the use of a minor donor provided no better outcome than that expected from an adult donor. Live organ donation from a minor should only be considered when there is no other living donor available and all other opportunities for transplantation have been exhausted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Increased transplanted organs from the use of a standardized donor management protocol.

The organ shortage has resulted in increasing recipient waiting lists and waiting-list deaths. The increased use of expanded donors has been associated with increased discarding of procured organs because of poor organ function. A structured donor management algorithm or critical pathway was tested to determine its effect on the donor management and procurement process. A pilot study examined donors from 88 critical care units in 10 organ procurement organizations managed under the critical pathway and compared them to retrospective data collected at those same pilot sites. The total number of organs both procured and transplanted per 100 donors was significantly greater (p <0.01) in the critical pathway group when compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in 1-year graft survival for any of the organs recovered, and no significant difference in the rate of delayed graft function in the kidneys transplanted. Use of a structured donor management algorithm results in significant increases in organs procured and organs transplanted without any reduction in the quality of the organs being transplanted.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed2002

Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification.

The incidence of acute humoral rejection (AHR) in renal allograft biopsies has been difficult to determine because widely accepted diagnostic criteria have not been established. C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC) of renal allografts has been proposed as a useful marker for AHR. This study was designed to test the relative value of C4d staining, histology, and serology in the diagnosis of AHR. Of 232 consecutive kidney transplants performed at a single institution from July 1995 to July 1999, all patients (n = 67) who developed acute rejection within the first 3 mo and had a renal biopsy with available frozen tissue at acute rejection onset, as well as posttransplant sera within 30 d of the biopsy, were included in this study. Hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff stained sections were scored for glomerular, vascular, and tubulointerstitial pathology. C4d staining of cryostat sections was done by a sensitive three-layer immunofluorescence method. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected in posttransplant recipient sera using antihuman-globulin-enhanced T cell and B cell cytotoxicity assays and/or flow cytometry. Widespread C4d staining in PTC was present in 30% (20 of 67) of all acute rejection biopsies. The initial histologic diagnoses of the C4d(+) acute rejection cases were as follows: AHR only, 30%; acute cellular rejection (ACR) and AHR, 45%; ACR (CCTT types 1 or 2) alone, 15%; and acute tubular injury (ATI), 10%. The distinguishing morphologic features in C4d(+) versus C4d(-) acute rejection cases included the following: neutrophils in PTC, 65% versus 9%; neutrophilic glomerulitis, 55% versus 4%; neutrophilic tubulitis, 55% versus 9%; severe ATI, 75% versus 9%; and fibrinoid necrosis in glomeruli, 20% versus 0%, or arteries, 25% versus 0%; all P < 0.01. Mononuclear cell tubulitis was more common in the C4d(-) group (70% versus 100%; P < 0.01). No significant difference between C4d(+) and C4d(-) acute rejection was noted for endarteritis, 25% versus 32%; interstitial inflammation (mean % cortex), 27.2 +/- 27% versus 38 +/- 21%; interstitial hemorrhage, 25% versus 15%; or infarcts, 5% versus 2%. DSA were present in 90% (18 of 20) of the C4d(+) cases compared with 2% (1 of 47) in the C4d(-) acute rejection cases (P < 0.001). The pathology of the C4d(+) but DSA(-) cases was not distinguishable from the C4d(+), DSA(+) cases. The C4d(+) DSA(-) cases may be due to non-HLA antibodies or subthreshold levels of DSA. The sensitivity of C4d staining is 95% in the diagnosis of AHR compared with the donor-specific antibody test (90%). Overall, eight grafts were lost to acute rejection in the first year, of which 75% (6 of 8) had AHR. The 1-yr graft failure rate was 27% (4 of 15) for those AHR cases with only capillary neutrophils versus 40% (2 of 5) for those who also had fibrinoid necrosis of arteries. In comparison, the 1-yr graft failure rates were 3% and 7%, respectively, in ACR 1 (Banff/CCTT type 1) and ACR 2 (Banff/CCTT type 2) C4d(-) groups. A substantial fraction (30%) of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes have a component of AHR as judged by C4d staining; most (90%), but not all, have detectable DSA. AHR may be overlooked in the presence of ACR or ATI by histology or negative serology, arguing for routine C4d staining of renal allograft biopsies. Because AHR has a distinct therapy and prognosis, we propose that it should be classified separately from ACR, with further sub-classification into AHR 1 (neutrophilic capillary involvement) and AHR 2 (arterial fibrinoid necrosis).

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Increasing the supply of kidneys for transplantation.

Kidney transplantation confers a survival advantage for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) when compared to dialysis and improves the quality of life in a cost-effective manner. Currently there are more than 60,000 patients on the U.S. waiting list for kidney transplantation. In 2004, 16,879 kidney transplants, including 880 simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplants, were performed in this country. Recent strategies for increasing the supply of kidneys hold promise, such as systematic programs designed to improve consent rates for deceased donor organ procurement. Efforts to increase donation after cardiac death (DCD) have been highly successful and now account for more than 5% of all deceased organ donors. Transplantation of kidneys from DCD donors yields 1-year graft and patient survival rates equivalent to kidneys from brain-dead donors. Expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys from donors > or = 60 years of age (or donors age 50-59 years with certain comorbidities) confer a survival benefit for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients compared to remaining on dialysis on the waiting list. The number of live donor kidney transplants, both from biologically related and unrelated donors, is increasing. Paired live donor kidney transplants provide yet another transplantation opportunity for ESRD patients with willing but incompatible (by ABO or direct antibody) living donors.

Cadaver↗