PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Francis M Burke

Publications and source records attributed to Francis M Burke.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Surface microhardness of a resin composite: a comparison of a tungsten halogen and a LED light curing unit, in vitro.

A comparison has been made between published surface microhardness numbers (VHN) of a commercial resin composite for different exposure times to a quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) and light-emitting diode (LED) light-curing unit (LCU). Both LCUs produced comparable hardness at both top and bottom surfaces, respectively, and similar bottom/top hardness ratios, for a specimen thickness of 1.5 mm, given sufficient exposure time (40 s) and an elapsed time of 24 h before measurement (for hardness numbers). However, some data are significantly different. There is no advantage in either LCU regarding optimal hardness and hardness ratios given an appropriate protocol. Immediate finishing (1 h) was more appropriate to the use of the LED LCU (with adequate exposure time). The effect of elapsed time after exposure on microhardness was more pronounced with the QTH LCU.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

Early surface microhardness of a resin composite exposed to a pulse-delayed curing exposure: a comparison of a tungsten halogen and a plasma arc lamp, in vitro.

Surface microhardness numbers of a commercial resin composite have been compared after exposure to a quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) and plasma arc (PAC) lamp respectively, using two exposure protocols. The effect of increased tip-to-composite distance has also been compared. Exposure with the PAC lamp tested is more appropriate to the early finishing of composite restorations after placement and curing than with the QTH. However both lamps were capable of producing comparable surface hardness, with appropriate exposure protocols. The effect of increased tip-to-composite distance was generally not significant between the lamps for continuous exposure.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2004

The influence of coronal restoration type on the survival of endodontically treated teeth.

The aim of this study is to investigate the association between coronal restoration type and survival of endodontically treated teeth. A review was performed of treatment records of patients who had endodontic treatment performed in the Department of Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Cork, Ireland during the period 1993-96. Demographic and dental factors such as age, gender, tooth type, coronal restoration type, and tooth status recorded at a review appointment were recorded. Tooth status at review was defined as 'tooth present' or 'tooth absent' based on the presence or absence of the endodontically treated tooth recorded in the treatment records at a review appointment held a minimum of one year following obturation of the root canal system. Of 176 teeth (166 patients) treated, survival of endodontically treated teeth was significantly more likely where restored with cast restorations (91.7%), amalgam restorations (86.5%), or composite restorations (83.0%), than teeth restored with temporary restorations (34.5%) (p<0.0001) (mean follow-up time 38 months, range 12-60 months). Survival of endodontically treated teeth was found to be associated with permanent coronal restorations. Loss of endodontically treated teeth occurred more often with those restored with temporary restorations (34.5%) than other restoration types (p<0.05).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Surface microhardness of a resin composite exposed to a "first-generation" LED curing lamp, in vitro.

This investigation determined the minimum exposure times consistent with optimised surface microhardness parameters for a commercial resin composite cured using a "first-generation" light-emitting diode activation lamp. Disk specimens were exposed and surface microhardness numbers measured at the top and bottom surfaces for elapsed times of 1 hour and 24 hours. Bottom/top microhardness number ratios were also calculated. Most microhardness data increased significantly over the elapsed time interval but microhardness ratios (bottom/top) were dependent on exposure time only. A minimum exposure of 40 secs is appropriate to optimise microhardness parameters for the combination of resin composite and lamp investigated.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed2002

Surface microhardness of a resin composite exposed to pulse-delayed plasma arc lamp irradiation, in vitro.

Groups of samples of a light-activated resin composite were exposed, using a 3-step pulse-delayed protocol, to a plasma arc unit. Further groups were exposed with the light-curing guide positioned at increasing distances from the composite surface. The pulse-delayed protocol yielded a progressive increase in microhardness number at the end of each step but with a maximum mean value significantly less than the controls. Increasing the irradiation distance yielded a progressive and significant decrease in microhardness number.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

In vitro study of surface microhardness of a resin composite exposed to a quartz-halogen lamp.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the minimum exposure times consistent with optimized surface microhardness numbers (VHN) for the top and bottom surfaces, respectively, of a resin composite (1.5-mm depth) cured using a quartz-halogen activation lamp. Additionally, to determine the conditions appropriate to achieve optimized bottom/top hardness ratios. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Disk specimens of a commercial resin composite restorative (Spectrum TPH) were exposed to a quartz-halogen lamp, and VHNs were measured for the top and bottom surfaces at elapsed times of 1 hour and 24 hours. RESULTS: Data were dependent on exposure time, time elapsed after exposure, and the surface involved. Exposure time featured limiting values in excess of which no significant increase in microhardness took place. All microhardness data increased significantly over an elapsed time interval between 1 hour and 24 hours postexposure. Microhardness ratios (bottom/top) were dependent on exposure time only and were not influenced by time elapsed after exposure. CONCLUSION: Minimum exposure time may be considered as the greater of the times to achieve optimized top hardness and optimized hardness ratio, respectively.

Composite Resins↗