PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Franck-Emmanuel Roux

Publications and source records attributed to Franck-Emmanuel Roux.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Category-specific cortical mapping: color-naming areas.

OBJECT: It has been hypothesized that a certain degree of specialization exists within language areas, depending on some specific lexical repertories or categories. To spare hypothetical category-specific cortical areas and to gain a better understanding of their organization, the authors studied patients who had undergone electrical stimulation mapping for brain tumors and they compared an object-naming task with a category-specific task (color naming). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with no significant preoperative language deficit were prospectively studied during a 2-year period. Along with a reading task, both object- and color-naming tasks were used in brain mapping. During color naming, patients were asked to identify 11 visually presented basic colors. The modality specificity of the color-naming sites found was subsequently tested by asking patients to retrieve the color attributes of objects. High individual variability was observed in language organization among patients and in the tasks performed. Significant interferences in color naming were found in traditional language regions-that is, Broca (p < 0.003) and Wernicke centers (p = 0.05)--although some color-naming areas were occasionally situated outside of these regions. Color-naming interferences were exclusively localized in small cortical areas (< 1 cm2). Anatomical segregation of the different naming categories was apparent in 10 patients; in all, 13 color-specific naming areas (that is, sites evoking no object-naming interference) were detected in the dominant-hemisphere F3 and the supramarginal, angular, and posterior parts of the temporal gyri. Nevertheless, no specific brain region was found to be consistently involved in color naming (p > 0.05). At five sites, although visually presented color-naming tasks were impaired by stimulation, auditory color naming (for example, "What color is grass?") was performed with no difficulty, showing that modality-specific areas can be found during naming. CONCLUSIONS: Within language areas, a relative specialization of cortical language areas for color naming can be found during electrical stimulation mapping.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Intra-operative mapping of cortical areas involved in reading in mono- and bilingual patients.

In order to identify the cortical areas involved in the reading process and to spare them during surgery, we systematically studied cortical areas by direct cortical stimulation in patients operated on for brain tumours. Seventy-six cortical stimulation mapping studies for language were performed in 35 monolingual and 19 bi- or multilingual patients over a 5-year period. We systematically searched for reading interference areas in addition to standard naming areas using an 'awake surgery' technique for brain mapping. A 'reading aloud' task (translated into different languages in multilingual patients) was used. Brain mapping was performed in left (44 patients) and right (10 patients) hemispheres. Cortical areas involved in reading were identified according to the type of interference, location and distinctness from naming areas. Stimulation of several major hemispheric regions resulted in significant interference with reading aloud: (i) the lower part of the pre- and postcentral gyri (P < 0.00001); (ii) the dominant supramarginal, angular and the posterior part of the superior temporal gyri (P < 0.00001); (iii) in the dominant inferior and middle frontal gyri (P < 0.001); and (iv) in the posterior part of the dominant middle temporal gyrus (P < 0.05). Interferences in reading were generally found in small cortical areas, with intervening areas evoking no reading interferences. Only partial overlap between reading and naming sites was found. Reading-specific sites were preferentially found when stimulating dominant inferior parietal or posterior temporal areas. Different types of reading interferences were noted. While 'articulatory' interferences were found in pre- and postcentral gyri bilaterally, and ocular-induced movements in bilateral middle frontal gyri, paraphasias were found mainly in the dominant supramarginal and posterior superior temporal gyri. Reading arrest sites were found in many regions. Reading interference sites were also occasionally found in the non-dominant hemisphere. In bilingual patients, if common cortical areas could be found, language- and reading-specific areas were sometimes detected, lending support to the concept that bilinguals can have relatively distinct cortical representation of their language skills. Finally, in this series, the location of reading interference sites and their relative specialization showed considerable individual variability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Writing-specific sites in frontal areas: a cortical stimulation study.

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to determine whether cortical areas involved in the writing process are associated with reading or naming areas in patients undergoing surgery for brain tumors in frontal areas. This study was undertaken to spare all language areas found in patients during surgery. METHODS: Fourteen patients (eight women and six men [mean age 47 years] of whom 12 were right handed, two left handed, 12 monolingual, and two bilingual) who harbored brain tumors in the left (11 patients) or right (three patients) frontal gyri or in rolandic areas, were tested by direct stimulation by using the awake surgery technique for direct brain mapping. Mapping of the frontal gyri was performed using naming, reading, and writing under dictation tasks in the appropriate language(s). Considerable individual variability in language organization among patients was observed. Interferences in writing were found during direct stimulation in the frontal gyri, in cortical sites common or not common to interferences in naming or reading. In dominant regions, patterns of writing dysfunctions were variable and included writing arrest, illegible script, letter omissions, and paragraphia. These dysfunctions were nonspecific (stimulation-induced eye movements) in nondominant frontal regions and in rolandic gyri (hand contractions). In the same patient, different writing impairments could sometimes be observed during stimulation of different sites. As is the case for naming or reading interference sites, writing interference sites could be extremely localized (1 cm2 in diameter). In this group of patients, writing interference sites found in Broca areas were associated with other sites of language interference, whereas writing-specific interference sites were found twice in the dominant middle frontal gyrus. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, we found that writing interference sites could be detected by direct cortical stimulation in dominant inferior and middle frontal gyri regardless of whether they were associated with naming or reading interference sites. Writing disorders elicited by direct stimulation in the frontal lobes are varied and probably depend on the functional status of the stimulated cortical area.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Language functional magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of language areas: correlation with direct cortical stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the usefulness of preoperative language functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), by correlating fMRI data with intraoperative cortical stimulation results for patients with brain tumors. METHODS: Naming and verb generation tasks were used, separately or in combination, for 14 right-handed patients with tumors in the left hemisphere. fMRI data obtained were analyzed with SPM software, with two standard analysis thresholds (P < 0.005 and then P < 0.05). The fMRI data were then registered in a frameless stereotactic neuronavigational device and correlated with direct brain mapping results. We used a statistical model with the fMRI information as a predictor, spatially correlating each intraoperatively mapped cortical site with fMRI data integrated in the neuronavigational system (site-by-site correlation). Eight patients were also studied with language fMRI postoperatively, with the same acquisition protocol. RESULTS: We observed high variability in signal extents and locations among patients with both tasks. The activated areas were located mainly in the left hemisphere in the middle and inferior frontal gyri (F2 and F3), the superior and middle temporal gyri (T1 and T2), and the supramarginal and angular gyri. A total of 426 cortical sites were tested for each task among the 14 patients. In frontal and temporoparietal areas, poor sensitivity of the fMRI technique was observed for the naming and verb generation tasks (22 and 36%, respectively) with P < 0.005 as the analysis threshold. Although not perfect, the specificity of the fMRI technique was good in all conditions (97% for the naming task and 98% for the verb generation task). Better correlation (sensitivity, 59%; specificity, 97%) was achieved by combining the two fMRI tasks. Variation of the analysis threshold to P < 0.05 increased the sensitivity to 66% while decreasing the specificity to 91%. Postoperative fMRI data (for the cortical brain areas studied intraoperatively) were in accordance with brain mapping results for six of eight patients. Complete agreement between pre- and postoperative fMRI studies and direct brain mapping results was observed for only three of eight patients. CONCLUSION: With the paradigms and analysis thresholds used in this study, language fMRI data obtained with naming or verb generation tasks, before and after surgery, were imperfectly correlated with intraoperative brain mapping results. A better correlation could be obtained by combining the fMRI tasks. The overall results of this study demonstrated that language fMRI could not be used to make critical surgical decisions in the absence of direct brain mapping. Other acquisition protocols are required for evaluation of the potential role of language fMRI in the accurate detection of essential cortical language areas.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Cortical areas involved in virtual movement of phantom limbs: comparison with normal subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that amputees performing "virtual" movements of their amputated limb activate cortical areas previously devoted to their missing limb, we studied amputees with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomographic (PET) scans and compared the results with those of normal volunteers performing imaginary movements during fMRI acquisitions. METHODS: Ten amputees (age range, 33-92 yr; average age, 49 yr; six men and four women; eight upper-limb and two lower-limb amputations) able to move their phantom limb at will were studied by fMRI (all patients) and PET scan (seven patients). The time between amputation and fMRI and PET studies ranged from 1 to 27 years (average, 13 yr). Patients were asked to perform virtual movements of the amputated limb and normal movements of the contralateral normal limb according to the functional images acquisition procedure. Movements of the stump were also used to differentiate stump cortical areas from virtual movement-activated areas. Ten right-handed volunteers, age- and sex-matched to the amputees, were also studied by fMRI. All volunteers were asked to perform four tasks during their fMRI study: imaginary movements of their right arm (1 task) and foot (1 task) and real movements of their left arm (1 task) and foot (1 task). RESULTS: In amputees, virtual movements of the missing limbs produced contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex activation on both fMRI and PET scans. These activation areas, different from the stump activation areas, were similar in location to contralateral normal limb-activated areas. Quantitatively, in two amputees who claimed to be able to perform both slow and fast virtual movements, regional cerebral blood flow measured by PET scan in the precentral gyrus increased significantly during fast movements in comparison with slow virtual movements. In normal subjects, significant differences between real versus imaginary fMRI activations were found (for both foot and hand movements); imaginary right hand and foot tasks activated primarily the contralateral supplementary motor areas, with no significant activation detected in the contralateral precentral or postcentral gyri. CONCLUSION: Primary sensorimotor cortical areas can be activated by phantom-limb movements and thus can be considered functional for several years or decades after amputation. In this study, we found that the location of the activation of these areas is comparable to that of activations produced by normal movements in control subjects or in amputees.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Writing, calculating, and finger recognition in the region of the angular gyrus: a cortical stimulation study of Gerstmann syndrome.

OBJECT: In an attempt to gain a better understanding of the cerebral functions represented in the angular gyrus and to spare them during surgery, the authors studied patients with brain tumors located close to the angular gyrus and mapped cortical sites by using electrostimulation. METHODS: Before undergoing tumor removal, six right-handed patients (five with left and one with right hemisphere tumors) were studied using cortical mapping with the aid of calculating, writing, finger-recognition, and color-naming tasks in addition to standard reading and object-naming tasks (for a total of 36 brain mapping studies). Strict conditions of functional site validation were applied to include only those cortical sites that produced repetitive interferences in the function tested. Preoperatively, four of the patients exhibited discrete symptoms related to Gerstmann syndrome while performing very specific tasks, whereas the other two patients presented with no symptoms of the syndrome. No patient had significant language or apraxic deficits. Distinct or shared cortical sites producing interferences in calculating, finger recognition, and writing were repeatedly found in the angular gyrus. Object- or color-naming sites and reading-interference sites were also found in or close to the angular gyrus; although frequently demonstrated, these latter results were variable and unpredictable in the group of patients studied. Finger agnosia and acalculia sites were also found elsewhere, such as in the supramarginal gyrus or close to the intraparietal sulcus. Mechanisms involved in acalculia, agraphia, or finger agnosia (either complete interferences or hesitations) during stimulation were various, from an aphasia-like form (for instance, the patient did not understand the numbers or words given for calculating or writing tasks) to an apparently pure interference in the function tested (patients understood the numbers, but were unable to perform a simple addition). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of Gerstmann syndrome can be found during direct brain mapping in the angular gyrus region. In this series of patients, sites producing interferences in writing, calculating, and finger recognition were demonstrated in the angular gyrus, which may or may not have been associated with object-naming, color-naming, or reading sites.

Agnosia↗
PubMed2003

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a spinal case with aggressive clinical course and ALK overexpression. Case report.

The authors report on a case of spinal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) in a 22-year-oldwoman. Neuroradiological features of this intradural extramedullary mass were suggestive of a meningioma or neurinoma. The lesion was easily resected following a T-9 laminectomy. Light microscopy showed a proliferation of spindle cells with prominent nucleoli on a fibrous or edematous background with infiltration of numerous lymphocytes and plasma cells. Some spindle cells immunostained positively for ALK1. This led to the diagnosis of IMT. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by a multifocal local recurrence requiring a second surgery, which was followed by radio- and chemotherapy. The occurrence of IMT in the spinal cord has rarely been reported. In this case, ALK overexpression was associated with early multifocal recurrence. This has been recently reported in this tumor typein other locations.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Organization of language areas in bilingual patients: a cortical stimulation study.

OBJECT: In an attempt to gain a better understanding of how multiple languages are represented in the human brain, the authors studied bilingual patients who underwent surgery for brain tumors, during which the authors mapped cortical language sites by using electrostimulation. METHODS: Reading, counting, and word retrieval tasks were studied in 12 right-handed bilingual patients with no language deficit. All bilingual patients were native to France. One patient spoke four languages. The patients constituted a nonhomogeneous group in terms of language proficiency or age of acquisition. Languages were evaluated and classified into three major groups, depending on proficiency and date of acquisition. Strict conditions of language site validation were applied, separating typical anomia sites from speech arrest or other language sites (such as hesitation sites). A total of 30 speech arrest sites, 16 anomia sites, and three sites of language difficulties (not typically classified as speech arrest) were found throughout the 26 language studies performed. Strict overlapping of language areas (for all language tasks) was found in five patients, whereas the remaining seven had at least one area that was language-specific and sometimes task-specific. Specific areas for a particular language were found for word retrieval tasks (anomia) in eight sites (50%) but also in six (20%) of the reading or counting sites (speech arrest), either in frontal (three patients) or in temporoparietal (four patients) regions. Among the four early bilingual patients tested (languages acquired before the age of 7 years), three had language-specific cortical areas. Interestingly, six patients in this series who had a discrepancy between two languages did not have more cortical areas devoted to the less proficient language (with acknowledgment of the limit in cortical exposure available for testing by the craniotomy). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the authors found that bilingual patients could have common but also different cortical areas for both languages in temporoparietal areas and in frontal areas. In some cases, the authors found that language tasks such as counting, reading, or word retrieval in different languages can be sustained by language- and task-specific cortical areas. In bilingual patients, cortical mapping should ideally be performed using different language tasks in all languages in which the patient is fluent.

Adult↗