Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Franco Valenza.
Computed tomography has completely changed the views and interpretation of ARDS, opening a new era in our understanding of the physiological, pathological and clinical aspects of this syndrome. In this brief review we will emphasize the most relevant new knowledge achieved using CT scanning and we will briefly discuss its clinical use in ARDS patients.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate if prone position delays the progression of experimental ventilator-induced lung injury, possibly due to a more homogeneous distribution of strain within lung parenchyma. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Animal laboratory of a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Thirty-five Sprague Dawley male rats (weight 257 +/- 45 g). INTERVENTIONS: Mechanical ventilation in either supine or prone position and computed tomography scan analysis. MEASUREMENTS: : Animals were ventilated in supine (n = 15) or prone (n = 15) position until a similar ventilator-induced lung injury was reached. To do so, experiments were interrupted when respiratory system elastance was 150% of baseline. Ventilator-induced lung injury was assessed as lung wet-to-dry ratio and histology. Time to reach lung injury was considered as a main outcome measure. In five additional animals, computed tomography scans (GE Light Speed QX/I, thickness 1.25 mm, interval 0.6 mm, 100 MA, 100 Kv) were randomly taken at end-expiration and end-inspiration in both positions, and quantitative analysis was performed. Data are shown as mean +/- sd. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Similar ventilator-induced lung injury was reached (respiratory system elastance, wet-to-dry ratio, and histology). The time taken to achieve the target ventilator-induced lung injury was longer with prone position (73 +/- 37 mins vs. 112 +/- 42, supine vs. prone, p = .011). Computed tomography scan analysis performed before lung injury revealed that at end-expiration, the lung was wider in prone position (p = .004) and somewhat shorter (p = .09), despite similar lung volumes (p = .455). Lung density along the vertical axis increased significantly only in supine position (p = .002). Lung strain was greater in supine as opposed to prone position (width strain, 7.8 +/- 1.8% vs. 5.6 +/- 0.9, supine vs. prone, p = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Prone position delays the progression of ventilator-induced lung injury. Computed tomography scan analysis suggests that a more homogeneous distribution of strain may be implicated in the protective role of prone position against ventilator-induced lung injury.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether negative extra-abdominal pressure (NEXAP) improves respiratory function and induces a blood shift from the intrathoracic compartment and to assess whether these effects are influenced by abdominal pressure. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial in the animal laboratory of a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Eight sedated and paralyzed pigs (19.6+/-3.4 kg). INTERVENTIONS: Application of NEXAP (-20 cmH(2)O). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Airway, esophageal, gastric and central venous pressures were recorded simultaneously. Intrathoracic blood volume was assessed by PiCCO. The effects of NEXAP were assessed with and without abdominal hypertension by intraperitoneal insufflation of helium. NEXAP caused a lasting drop of gastric (1.97+/-2.26 mmHg) and esophageal (1.21+/-0.67 mmHg) pressures, while end-expiratory airway pressure was similar, hence transpulmonary pressure increased. Intrathoracic blood volume dropped from 358+/-47 to 314+/-47 ml. The fall was associated with a decrease in central venous pressure (R(2)=0.820). When peritoneal pressure was raised (24.7+/-5.5 mmHg), the effects were less marked. However, the difference between negative pressure around the abdomen and the pressure inside the abdomen (effective NEXAP) was correlated with the proportional changes in intrathoracic blood volume (R(2)=0.648), being greater with more negative effective NEXAP. NEXAP improved chest wall elastance during abdominal hypertension (from 0.067+/-0.023 to 0.056+/-0.021 cmH(2)O/ml). CONCLUSIONS: NEXAP increases lung volume and causes a shift of blood from the intrathoracic compartment. It needs to be tailored against abdominal pressure to be effective.
The importance of chest wall elastance in characterizing acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients and in setting mechanical ventilation is increasingly recognized. Nearly 30% of patients admitted to a general intensive care unit have an abnormal high intra-abdominal pressure (due to ascites, bowel edema, ileus), which leads to an increase in the chest wall elastance. At a given applied airway pressure, the pleural pressure increases according to (in the static condition) the equation: pleural pressure = airway pressure x (chest wall elastance/total respiratory system elastance). Consequently, for a given applied pressure, the increase in pleural pressure implies a decrease in transpulmonary pressure (airway pressure - pleural pressure), which is the distending force of the lung, implies a decrease of the strain and of ventilator-induced lung injury, implies the need to use a higher airway pressure during the recruitment maneuvers to reach a sufficient transpulmonary opening pressure, implies hemodynamic risk due to the reductions in venous return and heart size, and implies a possible increase of lung edema, partially due to the reduced edema clearance. It is always important in the most critically ill patients to assess the intra-abdominal pressure and the chest wall elastance.
In the last several years, we definitely learned that the acute respiratory distress syndrome lung is small, nonhomogeneous, and that mechanical ventilation in this baby lung may cause physical damage as well as inflammatory reaction. The clinical benefit of the gentle lung treatment, based on a decrease of global/regional stress and strain into the lung, has been finally proved. However, we forgot the importance of lung perfusion and its distribution in this syndrome and, besides a low tidal volume, we still do not know how to handle the other variables of mechanical ventilation. Measurements of variables as transpulmonary pressure and end expiratory lung volume, for a rational setting of mechanical ventilation, should be introduced in routine clinical practice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Increased abdominal pressure is common in intensive care unit patients. To investigate its impact on respiration and hemodynamics we applied intraabdominal pressure (aIAP) of 0 and 20 cm H(2)O (pneumoperitoneum) in seven pigs. The whole-lung computed tomography scan and a complete set of respiratory and hemodynamics variables were recorded both in healthy lung and after oleic acid (OA) injury. In healthy lung, aIAP 20 cm H(2)O significantly lowered the gas content, leaving the tissue content unchanged. In OA-injured lung at aIAP 0 cm H(2)O, the gas content significantly decreased compared with healthy lung. The excess tissue mass (edema) amounted to 30 +/- 24% of the original tissue weight (455 +/- 80 g). The edema was primarily distributed in the base regions and was not gravity dependent. Heart volume, central venous, pulmonary artery, wedge, and systemic arterial pressures significantly increased. At aIAP 20 cm H(2)O in OA-injured lung, the central venous and pulmonary artery pressures further increased. The gas content further decreased, and the excess tissue mass rose up to 103 +/- 37% (tissue weight 905 +/- 134 g), with homogeneous distribution along the cephalocaudal and sternovertebral axis. We conclude that in OA-injured lung, the increase of IAP increases the amount of edema.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibility of artificially decreasing intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) by applying continuous negative pressure around the abdomen. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated the effects of negative extra-abdominal pressure (NEXAP) on IAP and central venous pressure (CVP) in 30 patients admitted to our intensive care unit (age 57+/-17 years, BMI 26.1+/-4.0 kg/m2, SAPS II 41.8+/-17.0). Patients with severe hemodynamic instability and/or those admitted following a laparotomy were not studied. Measurements included bladder pressure as an estimate of IAP, CVP, invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). In five patients extensive hemodynamic measurements were also taken using a Swan-Ganz catheter. Following measurements at baseline (Basal), NEXAP (Life Care - Nev 100, Respironics) was applied on the abdomen, in random order, at a pressure equal to IAP (NEXAP0), 5 cmH(2)O (NEXAP-5) or 10 cmH(2)O (NEXAP-10) more negative than NEXAP0. RESULTS: Basal IAP ranged from 4 to 22 mmHg. NEXAP decreased IAP from 8.7+/-4.3 mmHg to 6+/-4.2 (Basal vs NEXAP0 p<0.001). There was a further decrease of IAP when more negative pressure was applied: 4.3+/-3.2 mmHg, 3.8+/-3.7 mmHg (NEXAP-5 and NEXAP-10 vs NEXAP0, respectively, p<0.001). Similarly, CVP decreased from 9.3+/-3.4 mmHg to 7.5+/-3.8 (Basal vs NEXAP-10, p<0.001). The lower the IAP when NEXAP was applied, the lower the CVP (r2=0.778, p<0.001, multiple linear regression). When measured, cardiac output did not significantly change with NEXAP. CONCLUSIONS: Negative extra-abdominal pressure may be applied in critically ill patients to decrease intra-abdominal pressure non-invasively.
OBJECTIVE: Many studies have investigated the protective role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on ventilator-induced lung injury. Most assessed lung injury in protocols involving different ventilation strategies applied for the same length of time. This study, however, set out to investigate the protective role of PEEP with respect to the time needed to reach similar levels of lung injury. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized laboratory animal investigation. SETTING: The University Laboratory of Ospedale Maggiore, Milano, IRCCS. SUBJECTS: Anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: Three groups of five Sprague-Dawley rats were ventilated using zero end-expiratory pressure ZEEP (PEEP of 0 cm H(2)O) and PEEP of 3 and 6 cm H(2)O and a similar index of lung overdistension (Paw(p)/P(100) congruent with 1.1; where Paw(p) is peak airway pressure and P(100) is the pressure corresponding to total lung capacity). To obtain this, tidal volume was reduced depending on the PEEP. To reach similar levels of lung injury, we measured respiratory system elastance while ventilating the animals and killed them when respiratory system elastance was 150% of baseline. Once target respiratory system elastance was reached, the lung wet-to-dry ratio was obtained. RESULTS: Rats were ventilated with comparable high airway pressure (Paw(p) of 42.8 +/- 3.1, 43.5 +/- 2.6, and 46.2 +/- 4.4, respectively, for PEEP 0, 3, and 6) obtaining similar overdistension (Paw(p)/P(100) - index of overdistension: 1.17 +/- 0.2, 1.06 +/- 0.1, and 1.19 +/- 0.2). The respiratory system elastance target was reached and wet-to-dry ratio was not different in the three groups, suggesting a similar degree of lung damage. The time taken to achieve the target respiratory system elastance was three times longer with PEEP 3 and 6 (55 +/- 14 mins and 60 +/- 17) as compared with zero end-expiratory pressure (18 +/- 3 mins, p <.001). CONCLUSION: These findings confirm that PEEP is protective against ventilator-induced lung injury and may enable the clinician to "buy time" in the progression of lung injury.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gas exchange improvement in response to the prone position is associated with an improved outcome in acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients in the pronation arm of a controlled randomized trial on prone positioning and patients enrolled in a previous pilot study of the prone position. SETTING: Twenty-eight Italian and two Swiss intensive care units. PATIENTS: We studied 225 patients meeting the criteria for ALI or ARDS. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were in prone position for 10 days for 6 hrs/day if they met ALI/ARDS criteria when assessed each morning. Respiratory variables were recorded before and after 6 hrs of pronation with unchanged ventilatory settings. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured arterial blood gas alterations to the first pronation and the 28-day mortality rate. The independent risk factors for death in the general population were the Pao2/Fio2 ratio (odds ratio, 0.992; confidence interval, 0.986-0.998), the minute ventilation/Paco2 ratio (odds ratio, 1.003; confidence interval, 1.000-1.006), and the concentration of plasma creatinine (odds ratio, 1.385; confidence interval, 1.116-1.720). Pao2 responders (defined as the patients who increased their Pao2/Fio2 by > or =20 mm Hg, 150 patients, mean increase of 100.6 +/- 61.6 mm Hg [13.4 +/- 8.2 kPa]) had an outcome similar to the nonresponders (59 patients, mean decrease -6.3 +/- 23.7 mm Hg [-0.8 +/- 3.2 kPa]; mortality rate 44% and 46%, respectively; relative risk, 1.04; confidence interval, 0.74-1.45, p =.65). The Paco2 responders (defined as patients whose Paco2 decreased by > or =1 mm Hg, 94 patients, mean decrease -6.0 +/- 6 mm Hg [-0.8 +/- 0.8 kPa]) had an improved survival when compared with nonresponders (115 patients, mean increase 6 +/- 6 mm Hg [0.8 +/- 0.8 kPa]; mortality rate 35.1% and 52.2%, respectively; relative risk, 1.48; confidence interval, 1.07-2.05, p =.01). CONCLUSION: ALI/ARDS patients who respond to prone positioning with reduction of their Paco2 show an increased survival at 28 days. Improved efficiency of alveolar ventilation (decreased physiologic deadspace ratio) is an important marker of patients who will survive acute respiratory failure.
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a 50% increase in respiratory system elastance (Ers) would indicate similar degree of lung damage (equi-damage, ED), independently of ventilation strategy. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, randomized animal laboratory investigation at a university hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS: 35 anesthetized, paralyzed, mechanically ventilated male Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: Each rat was ventilated with a different combination of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and inspired fraction of oxygen. Ers was determined throughout the experiment; the studies were interrupted when Ers reached 150% (ED) of its baseline value, or after 5 h. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Lung wet to dry weight ratio (W/D) was assessed. Morphological damage of the lung was scored on a grading of perivascular edema, hemorrhage, and breaks in the alveolar septa to obtain a total injury score. Twenty-four rats achieved an Ers of 150%: nine within 1 h (class 1), nine in 1-2 h (class 2), and six in 2-5 h (class 3). Eleven rats did not reach the target 50% increase in Ers (class 4). W/D was higher in rats that reached the target than in those that did not. W/D did not differ among rats that reached ED. Similarly, the total injury score did not differ among classes 1-3 but was higher than class 4. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of VILI a 50% increase in Ers corresponds to an equal level of lung damage, irrespective of ventilatory setting and time of ventilation.