PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Francois Eisinger

Publications and source records attributed to Francois Eisinger.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Breast cancer guidelines--Physicians' intentions and behaviors.

Guidelines are written to define what a physician should do, and networks set up to provide every patient with good practice. However, is willingness to treat according norms enough to actually implement it? Between 1997 and 2003, 4,533 women with invasive, noninflammatory, nonmetastatic breast cancer have been treated within the framework of a regional network (R2C). The rate of implementation of 5 consensual norms was assessed. The rate of "abnormal" management regarding surgical re-excision for inadequate margin was found to be 12.6%. The main explanatory variable was patient age >70 years (OR = 4.05). For nodal exploration, the sampling quality threshold was set at 10. Mean rate of lack of compliance was 25.2%. The 2 main explicative factors were surgeon's experience and women's age. The observed rate of "insufficient" irradiation dose was 18.2%. The main explanatory variables were age (with a gradient) and a negative nodal status. Concerning adjuvant chemotherapy, the rate of no treatment (despite consensual indication) was 16.0%. Again, the main explicative factor was age (with a gradient). Women's age appears to be a major explanatory variable predicting lack of physician's compliance with consensual norms. Besides the age of the women, a "better" prognosis (negative nodal status and pT < or = 20 mn) is often associated with lack of compliance. It is not clear, however, if it's the rules that do not fit the clinical situation of aging patients or the physicians who are not aware of the benefit of consensual disease management for aging patients.

Adult↗

Behavioral and economic impact of a familial history of cancers.

BACKGROUND: Misunderstanding of cancer screening recommendations or messages and confidence in the predictive value of positive familial history of disease may converge to stimulate an over-utilization of screening tests in oncology by patients who perceive themselves to be at high risk. METHODS: A survey looking for predictors of the uptake of five cancer screening tests (mammography, colonoscopy, Fecal Occult Blood Test, upper digestive tract endoscopy and chest X-ray) was carried out on 4000 healthy adults (mean age 46.4 years). FINDINGS: Based on the results of a multivariate analysis, the survey enlightens the existing relationships between familial history and increasing uptake of medical cancer screening tests, with OR ranging from 1.3 (IC 1.0-1.6) for chest X-ray to 3.0 (IC 2.1-4.1) for colonoscopy. In France (60 million inhabitants), a conservative assessment of the annual net number of unhelpful screening tests attributable to positive family history of related cancer with chest X-ray and Upper digestive tract endoscopy lead to a figure of 7000 and 7800 tests respectively corresponding to a total annual cost of more than Euro 7, million. INTERPRETATION: Clearer messages about hereditary risks and transparency about the efficacy of screening tests are required in order to decrease over utilization of screening tests and their related costs.

Adult↗