The goal is performance evaluation not outcome prediction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Francois Lacour-Gayet.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The STS-EACTS International Nomenclature for Congenital Heart Surgery (CHS) defines four anatomic subtypes of double outlet right ventricle (DORV) based on the relationship of the ventricular septal defect (VSD) with the great vessels and the presence of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (RVOTO). We reviewed our experience with DORV patients and two ventricles that underwent repair, applying this nomenclature. METHODS: Between January 2000 and January 2005, 50 patients with DORV and two viable ventricles underwent surgical intervention: 44 patients had biventricular repair, 3 had 1.5 ventricular repair, 2 underwent a Fontan, and 1 died prior to corrective surgery. Median age at repair was 9.1 months (range: 4D-4Y). Eighteen patients (36%) were DORV-Fallot (including 5 with AVSD and heterotaxy), 9 (18%) were DORV-TGA (Taussig-Bing), 12 (24%) were DORV-VSD, and 11 (22%) were DORV non-committed VSD. Corrective surgery included 35 repairs with a VSD-aorta baffle+/-RVOTO procedure and 12 arterial switches with a VSD-PA baffle (9 Taussig-Bing and 3 DORV-ncVSD). Associated procedures included 13 VSD enlargements, 8 subaortic resections, 9 arch repairs, 5 AVSD repairs, and 7 others. RESULTS: There were three deaths in the 50 patients studied (overall mortality of 6%). Excluding one patient that died prior to corrective surgery and the two patients palliated with a Fontan procedure, the actual surgical mortality for a corrective repair was 4.3% (2/47 patients). Two surgical deaths occurred following, respectively, one repair of a Taussig-Bing with an interrupted arch and a Swiss cheese VSD and one repair of ncVSD-type with pulmonary atresia that had undergone a previous cavo-pulmonary anastamosis. No late deaths occurred. Two late reoperations included a heart transplant in a DORV-Fallot patient with Swiss cheese VSD and subaortic resection in a DORV-ncVSD patient. Angioplasties were needed for PA stenosis (n=2) and aortic arch obstruction (n=2). Four patients had LV to aorta baffle gradients between 10 and 20 mmHg. All patients were of NYHA class I/II. CONCLUSIONS: The STS-EACTS International Nomenclature provides more uniform analysis of outcomes with respect to acceptable surgical risk and mortality. Biventricular repair can be safely achieved on selected DORV, including DORV-ncVSD and DORV with AVSD and heterotaxy lesions traditionally indicated for a single ventricle palliative approach.
OBJECTIVE: The multi-national and multi-institutional collection of data on outcomes in Congenital Heart Surgery (CHS) provides the possibility of analysis of results of treatment and may result in further improvement of the quality of care. The verification of data as far as the completeness and accuracy is necessary to give confidence to all sides--the patients, centers and regulatory authorities. The source data verification (SDV), although difficult, appears possible even in such a large-scale database. METHODS: Out of 5.274 patients and 5.612 procedures data of 2003, collected in the database, 1.703 (32.3%) and 1.895 (33.8%), respectively, have been verified at five sites on following fields: IPPV time, date of birth, date of admission, date of surgery, date of discharge/mortality, body weight, case category, CPB time, AoX time, Circulatory arrest time. SDV was performed at five sites by two database officers using the sources of information different to the local copy of the database (patients' files, operation notes, perfusion charts, OR Books). Verification was performed between June 1st and July 31st 2004. Statistical analysis was performed using R-project software, ver. 2.0.0. and Welch's t-test for comparison of continuous variables. P-value >0.05 was used as statistically significant difference between groups. RESULTS: Pre- and post-verification mortalities in all groups showed no significant differences although seven deaths out of 68 (10.27%) were missed. None of the other verified fields showed significant differences after verification. CONCLUSIONS: Source Data Verification showed no statistically significant differences between verified and non-verified data on 30 days mortality, LOS, age, body weight, CPB time, AoX and Circulatory arrest time. IPPV time was not available in 58.6% procedures.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to identify potential anatomic and surgical factors creating left-sided lesions, namely recoarctation of the aorta and neoaortic regurgitation, after anatomic repair of transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect and aortic coarctation. METHODS: From 1983 to September 2002, 109 survivors out of 120 patients were studied. Two-stage repair was performed in 42 patients (group A), and single-stage repair was performed in 67 (groups B and C). Before repair, the diameters of the ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery were measured. In the patients with single-stage repair, coarctation was repaired by extended end-to-end anastomosis in 35 patients (group B) and by pulmonary homograft patch augmentation in 32 patients (group C). The ventricular septal defect was closed through the pulmonary artery in 70 patients and through the right ventricle or atrium in 39 patients. The neoaorto-aortic discrepancy was treated by V-shaped resection of the posterior sinus of Valsalva in 7 cases, pulmonary homograft patch in 32 cases, and anterior splitting of the ascending aorta in all cases. Before discharge from the hospital, neoaortic root and ascending aorta diameters and aortic regurgitation grade were recorded. Neoaortic regurgitation progression and reintervention were the end points of follow-up (97.2 +/- 61.2 months). RESULTS: Early and late survivals were significantly better in group C (P <.001). Risk factors for neoaortic regurgitation at discharge by univariate analysis were single-stage repair (P <.05) and ventricular septal defect closure through the pulmonary artery (P =.0076). On multivariate analysis, the latter was the only risk factor for neoaortic regurgitation at discharge and at last follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that higher neoaortic root/ascending aorta ratio and ventricular septal defect closure through the pulmonary artery were risk factors for neoaortic regurgitation evolution at last follow-up. There were 29 reinterventions, 19 for recoarctation of the aorta and 10 for neoaortic regurgitation with or without aortic root dilatation. Group B (P <.05), high neoaortic root/ascending aorta ratio (P <.01), and progressive neoaortic regurgitation (P <.05) were risk factors for recoarctation of the aorta. Group A was a risk factor for aortic valve replacement at 10 years (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Neonatal single-stage repair with pulmonary homograft aortic augmentation remains the optimal approach to transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect and aortic coarctation. It provides better early and late survivals and freedoms from left-sided lesions. Avoidance of late recoarctation of the aorta and progressive neoaortic regurgitation requires meticulous closure of the ventricular septal defect and evenly sized reconstruction of the aorta from root to distal arch.
The aim of the Aristotle project was to develop a new method of evaluation of quality of care in congenital heart surgery based on the complexity of the surgical procedures. Involving a panel of expert surgeons, the project started in 1999 and included 50 pediatric surgeons from 23 countries representing International Scientific Societies. The complexity was based on the procedures as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/European Association for Cadiothoracic Surgery (EACTS) International Nomenclature and was undertaken in two steps: The first step was establishing the Basic Score, which adjusts only the complexity of the procedures and is based on three factors: the potential for mortality, the potential for morbidity, and the anticipated technical difficulty. The second step was the development of the Comprehensive Score, which further adjusts the complexity according to the specific patient characteristics. The Aristotle score allows precise scoring of the complexity for 145 congenital heart surgery procedures. One interesting concept coming out of this study is that complexity is a constant and precise value for a given patient regardless of the center where he is operated. The Aristotle method allows proposing the following equation of quality of care: Complexity FN Outcome = Performance. The Aristotle score, electronically available, was introduced in the EACTS and STS databases. A validation process, designed to evaluate its predictive value, is being developed.
In 1998, the first report of the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) National Congenital Heart Surgery Database defined clinical features for 18 congenital heart disease categories, providing a significant amount of important information and pinpointing database strengths and weaknesses. Following this report, the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Committee, working with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Foundation, initiated the International Congenital Heart Surgery and Nomenclature Database Project. To standardize nomenclature and reporting strategies and establish a foundation for an international congenital heart surgery database. The project's first report was published in the Annals of Thoracic Surgery in April 2000. The current report outlines modifications to the minimal dataset and diagnosis and procedure short lists.
The first report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Congenital Heart Surgery Database in 1998 reported the clinical features of 18 congenital heart categories. The report provided a significant amount of important information and also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the existing database. Following this report the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Committee in cooperation with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Foundation initiated the International Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project. The goal was to begin the standardization of nomenclature reporting strategies and establish the foundations for an international congenital heart surgery database. The first report of the International Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature Project was published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery in April 2000. The current report outlines modifications to the minimum dataset as well as the diagnoses and procedure short lists. Plans for the next STS National Congenital Heart Surgery Database harvest are also presented.
In 1998, the first report of the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) National Congenital Heart Surgery Database reported the clinical features of 18 congenital heart categories. The report provided a significant amount of important information and also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the existing database. Following this report, the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Committee, in cooperation with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Foundation, initiated the International Congenital Heart Surgery and Nomenclature Database Project. The goal was to begin the standardization of nomenclature and reporting strategies and establish the foundations for an international congenital heart surgery database. The first report of the International Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature Project was published in the Annals of Thoracic Surgery in April 2000. The current report outlines modifications to the minimal dataset, as well as the diagnosis and procedure short lists.