Biomedical subjects

Franklin R Manis

Publications and source records attributed to Franklin R Manis.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Deficits in achromatic phantom contour perception in poor readers.

In a previous study [Sperling, A. J., Lu, Z. L., Manis, F. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2003). Selective deficits in magnocellular processing: A "phantom contour" study. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1422-1429] we found that dyslexic children were relatively slower in processing achromatic phantom contours. The maximum temporal frequency at which they could identify achromatic phantom contours was correlated with reading ability and orthographic skill in particular. Here we investigated whether similar deficits could be identified in adults. Poor readers were chosen who scored below the 25th percentile on either a standardized test of word identification or nonword pronunciation. Good readers were chosen who scored above the 40th percentile on both reading tasks. We replicated the findings of the child study: poor readers had slower processing in the achromatic version of the task, but not in the chromatic version. Achromatic performance correlated with several measures of reading and reading-related skills, including exception word reading and phonological awareness. We discuss the possibility that the deficits may indicate impairment in noise exclusion that is more readily apparent at higher temporal frequencies.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMed2006

Motion-perception deficits and reading impairment: it's the noise, not the motion.

We tested the hypothesis that deficits on sensory-processing tasks frequently associated with poor reading and dyslexia are the result of impairments in external-noise exclusion, rather than motion perception or magnocellular processing. We compared the motion-direction discrimination thresholds of adults and children with good or poor reading performance, using coherent-motion displays embedded in external noise. Both adults and children who were poor readers had higher thresholds than their respective peers in the presence of high external noise, but not in the presence of low external noise or when the signal was clearly demarcated. Adults' performance in high external noise correlated with their general reading ability, whereas children's performance correlated with their language and verbal abilities. The results support the hypothesis that noise-exclusion deficits impair reading and language development and suggest that the impact of such deficits on the development of reading skills changes with age.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Deficits in perceptual noise exclusion in developmental dyslexia.

We evaluated signal-noise discrimination in children with and without dyslexia, using magnocellular and parvocellular visual stimuli presented either with or without high noise. Dyslexic children had elevated contrast thresholds when stimuli of either type were presented in high noise, but performed as well as non-dyslexic children when either type was displayed without noise. Our findings suggest that deficits in noise exclusion, not magnocellular processing, contribute to the etiology of dyslexia.

Artifacts↗

PubMed2004

Slower implicit categorical learning in adult poor readers.

We investigated the relationship between reading and explicit and implicit categorical learning by comparing university students with poor reading to students with normal reading abilities on two categorical learning tasks. One categorical learning task involved sorting simple geometric shapes into two groups according to a unidimensional rule. The sorting rule was easily stated by the participants, consistent with explicit learning, and all participants attained criterion levels of performance. The second task involved the integration of features on different dimensions with a more complex rule that could not be described by participants, even though most could attain criterion levels of performance consistent with implicit learning. Poor readers performed as well as those without reading problems in explicit learning but not in implicit learning. Implicit learning was correlated with word reading, phonological decoding, and orthographic skill, independent of verbal ability. We consider the role of implicit learning in reading, and how a deficit could impair phonological and orthographic representation and processing.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Variation among developmental dyslexics: evidence from a printed-word-learning task.

A word-learning task was used to investigate variation among developmental dyslexics classified as phonological and surface dyslexics. Dyslexic children and chronological age (CA)- and reading level (RL)-matched normal readers were taught to pronounce novel nonsense words such as veep. Words were assigned either a regular (e.g., "veep") or an irregular (e.g., "vip") pronunciation. Phonological dyslexics learned both regular and exception words more slowly than the normal readers and, unlike the other groups, did not show a regular-word advantage. Surface dyslexics also learned regular and exception words more slowly than the CA group, consistent with a specific problem in mastering arbitrary item-specific pronunciations, but their performance resembled that of the RL group. The results parallel earlier findings from Manis, Seidenberg, Doi, McBride-Chang, & Petersen [Cognition 58 (1996) 157-195] indicating that surface dyslexics and phonological dyslexics have a different profile of reading deficits, with surface dyslexics resembling younger normal readers and phonological dyslexics showing a specific phonological deficit. Models of reading and reading disability need to account for the heterogeneity in reading processes among dyslexic children.

Articulation Disorders↗

PubMed2003

Selective magnocellular deficits in dyslexia: a "phantom contour" study.

A technique by Rogers-Ramachandran and Ramachandran [Vis. Res. 38 (1998) 71-77] was adapted to evaluate magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) visual processing efficiency, with identical task structure, in normal and dyslexic children. A battery of phonological, orthographic and cognitive tasks was administered to assess reading ability and component reading skills in both groups. For the visual processing experiment, children identified shapes created by patterns of dots flickering in counter-phase. The dots were black and white in the M condition, versus isoluminant red and green in the P condition. A staircase procedure determined the children's threshold flicker rate for shape identification. Dyslexics displayed selectively slower visual processing in the M condition but not in the P condition. Across all subjects, performance in the M condition was correlated with measures of orthographic skill, consistent with previous findings linking M processing and orthographic skill. Within the dyslexic group, processing in the M condition was negatively correlated with level of phonological awareness. The results are not consistent with the argument that dyslexics with phonological impairments suffer from deficits across all sensory modalities, as those children with the poorest phonological awareness displayed magnocellular processing well within the normal range.

Adolescent↗