PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Frans J van Ittersum

Publications and source records attributed to Frans J van Ittersum.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Initiating CAPD with a regimen low in glucose and glucose degradation products, with icodextrin and amino acids (NEPP) is safe and efficacious.

BACKGROUND: The high Levels of glucose, glucose degradation products (GDPs), and lactate buffer present in standard peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions contribute to peritoneal damage, malnutrition, and dyslipidemia. Therefore, we studied the feasibility of a PD regimen as low as possible in glucose and GDPs. METHODS: In a prospective 30-week study, patients new to continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) were randomized to either a standard PD regimen (SPD; 4 dwells glucose-/lactate-based) or a low glucose-GDP regimen (NEPP; 1 dwell amino acids, 1 dwell icodextrin, and two dwells bicarbonate/lactate-buffered glucose-based solution). RESULTS: Results obtained during a 30-week study period for 63 new CAPD patients (30 NEPP, 33 SPD) were analyzed. Intraperitoneal glucose load was lower in the NEPP group (111 +/- 76 vs 159 +/- 40 g/day at 30 weeks, p < 0.001). Dialysis efficacy, ultrafiltration, weight, blood pressure, and laboratory results were similar in the groups, whereas, in the NEPP group, cancer antigen 125 in dialysate effluents decreased less but dialysate-to-plasma ratios were slightly higher. CONCLUSION: Short-term treatment of new CAPD patients with a PD regimen low in glucose and GDPs is feasible. Dialysis efficacy, ultrafiltration, and metabolic consequences are similar to those during a standard glucose-lactate-based regimen, whereas peritoneal transport seems slightly higher and preservation of mesothelial cell mass better during NEPP.

Adult↗

Clinical effects of a peritoneal dialysis regimen low in glucose in new peritoneal dialysis patients: a randomized crossover study.

Standard glucose-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions have unfavorable effects on the peritoneum and contribute to metabolic abnormalities. A PD regimen in which solutions with an alternative osmotic agent (icodextrin, amino acids) and solutions with a bicarbonate/lactate buffer are combined may reduce those effects. In a prospective crossover study, we randomized new continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients to one of two groups. One group used 4 exchanges of standard PD (SPD) solution (Dianeal: Baxter Healthcare BV, Utrecht, Netherlands) daily. The second group used 1 exchange of Nutrineal (Baxter Healthcare BV), 1 exchange of Extraneal (Baxter Healthcare BV), and 2 exchanges of Physioneal (Baxter Healthcare BV) daily (NEPP). After 30 weeks of treatment, each group switched over to the other regimen for 24 weeks. Statistical analysis used analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements. Of the 74 patients enrolled into the study, 50 completed the full study period (24 NEPP-SPD, 26 SPD-NEPP). With regard to daily ultrafiltration and dialysis efficacy (Kt/V), the NEPP regimen was as efficacious as the standard regimen. The NEPP regimen was found to be safe: body weight, blood pressure, decline in urine volume, residual creatinine clearance, and laboratory measurements did not differ statistically significantly from those measured in the standard regimen. The NEPP regimen was well tolerated and was not accompanied by serious side effects. During the NEPP regimen, bicarbonate was found to be significantly higher in both groups. The NEPP regimen is a feasible treatment schedule for patients starting CAPD.

Amino Acids↗

Determinants of brachial artery mean 24 h pulse pressure in individuals with Type II diabetes mellitus and untreated mild hypertension.

Brachial artery pulse pressure is a predictor of (cardiovascular) morbidity, but its determinants in individuals with Type II diabetes and untreated mild hypertension have not been elucidated. We therefore cross-sectionally investigated determinants of brachial artery mean 24 h pulse pressure in 60 individuals (40 males; age, mean +/- S.D., 57.8 +/- 7.5 years) with Type II diabetes [median diabetes duration (interquartile range), 6.3 (3.6-10.1) years] and untreated mild hypertension [sitting blood pressure >140/90 mmHg and <190/120 mmHg (mean of two consecutive auscultatory office measurements after 5 min of rest)]. We measured (1) three potential determinants reflecting different aspects of central artery stiffness [the overall systemic arterial compliance, the aortic augmentation index and 1/(regional carotido-femoral transit time)], (2) structural and functional changes of the circulatory system often observed in Type II diabetes, and (3) diabetes-associated metabolic variables. After adjustment for age, gender and mean arterial pressure, brachial artery pulse pressure was associated with autonomic function [standardized regression coefficient (beta), -0.27 (P=0.01)], blood pressure decline during sleep [standardized beta, -0.32 (P=0.002)], fasting glucose concentration [standardized beta, 0.26 (P=0.01)], HbA(1c) concentration [standardized beta, 0.27 (P=0.003)] and diabetes duration [standardized beta, 0.28 (P=0.002)] in linear regression analyses. In a combined multivariate model, brachial artery pulse pressure was independently determined by gender [1=male, 2=female; standardized beta, 0.24 (P=0.01)], diabetes duration [standardized beta, 0.18 (P=0.03)], mean arterial pressure [standardized beta, 0.32 (P=0.002)], systemic arterial compliance [standardized beta, -0.23 (P=0.02)] and fasting glucose concentration [standardized beta, 0.20 (P=0.02)]. Aortic augmentation index and 1/(carotido-femoral transit time) were not independently associated with pulse pressure. In conclusion, in individuals with Type II diabetes and untreated mild hypertension, brachial artery pulse pressure is determined mainly by proximal aortic stiffness in a way which is not strongly influenced by peripheral pulse wave reflection. Approx. 60% of the variance in brachial artery pulse pressure could be explained by potentially modifiable determinants.

Adult↗