Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: dilemma of the distal ureter.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Fray F Marshall.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: We report the surgical technique and results of epididymal sparing bilateral simple orchiectomy as an esthetic alternative to standard bilateral simple orchiectomy and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist injection therapy in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 91 consecutive epididymal sparing bilateral simple orchiectomy (BSO) procedures that were performed at the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center during a 25-month period. All patients had pathologically confirmed prostate cancer. A total of 52 patients (57.1%) were receiving LH-RH agonist therapy prior to the procedure and the remaining 39 (42.9%) were not. All procedures were performed in an outpatient clinic setting using spermatic cord anesthesia block as the only method of anesthesia. In the 52 patients who were on LH-RH agonist therapy prior to the procedure the overall impression/satisfaction with the procedure was evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: All 91 procedures were performed at the urology outpatient clinic using local anesthesia. Mean patient age was 74.2 years (range 44 to 86). Mean serum prostate specific antigen was 58.9 ng/ml. The mean time required to perform the spermatic cord anesthesia block was 3.9 minutes (range 2 to 6) and the volume of anesthetic solution was 18.9 ml per case (range 10 to 32). Despite significant difference in testicular size between patients receiving and not receiving LH/RH agonists there were no differences in anesthesia time or anesthetic volume (3.9 and 3.9 minutes, p = 0.97, and 18.6 and 19.4 ml, respectively, p = 0.47). Mean operative time for BSO excluding anesthesia time was 36.9 minutes (range 18 to 70). Mean operative time was similar in patients receiving and not receiving LH-RH agonists (36.2 and 37.8 minutes, respectively, p = 0.39). The procedure was well tolerated, as judged by the mean intraoperative pain score during BSO of 0.2 (range 0 to 3). The majority of patients (76 or 83.5%) were pain-free during the procedure. Pain scores were similar in patients who were and were not receiving LH-RH agonists during BSO (p = 0.97). There were no adverse events. Followup data were available on 26 of the 52 patients who were receiving LH-RH agonist therapy prior to the procedure. Of them 96.2% were satisfied with the results and 84.6% preferred the procedure over medical castration therapy with LH-RH agonist therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Epididymal sparing bilateral simple orchiectomy is a simple and safe procedure that can be conveniently performed in an outpatient clinic setting using pure local anesthesia. Preservation of the epididymis and subsequent epididymoplasty is effective for maintaining the esthetic appearance of the scrotum and patient satisfaction. The procedure offers patients the convenience of 1-time surgical therapy over lifelong medical injection therapy at a significantly lower cost and without significantly compromising the esthetic appearance of the scrotum.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We report a previously unrecognized prostate-specific protein, PrLZ (prostate leucine zipper), a new member of the Tumor Protein D52 (TPD52) family. The gene for PrLZ was localized at chromosome 8q21.1, a locus most frequently amplified in human prostate cancer. Multiple tissue analyses demonstrated PrLZ predominantly in the prostate gland. Although its expression was enhanced by androgens in androgen receptor-expressing cells, PrLZ was detected in all of the human prostate cancer cell lines, regardless of androgen receptor status. Monoclonal anti-PrLZ antibodies were produced and intense immunohistochemical staining of PrLZ was observed in prostate epithelial cells in intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer, whereas lower-level staining was detected in normal and benign epithelial components of the prostate gland. As the only prostate-specific gene identified in the most frequently amplified genomic region in prostate cancer, PrLZ may be the link between chromosome 8q amplification and malignant transformation of the prostate epithelia.
PURPOSE: A cohort of more than 1,000 patients undergoing open minimally invasive radical retropubic prostatectomy (mini-lap RRP, 8.0 cm incision) is compared to published series of laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 209 consecutive patients undergoing mini-lap RRP at Emory University Hospital was evaluated. Characteristics noted were patient age, comorbidity status, preoperative prostate specific antigen, operative time, perioperative complications, blood transfusions, pathological staging, potency and continence. Postoperative analgesia was analyzed in a cohort of 30 consecutive recent patients. These data were compared to published reports of similar perioperative characteristics in laparoscopic RRP series. RESULTS: Differences between the cohorts of patients reviewed were found in age, preoperative prostate specific antigen, operative time and rate of blood transfusion. The series were comparable in comorbidity status, postoperative complications, rates of incontinence, rates of impotence and margin positivity. Analgesic use was quantified in a small group of patients according to the amount of narcotic analgesia required during the postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-lap RRP can generally be performed in less time and at less cost than most laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. It can be performed with regional anesthesia and has excellent postoperative results compared to contemporary laparoscopic procedures. Mini-lap RRP requires less training than laparoscopic RRP. With its minimal morbidity, mini-lap RRP remains an attractive technique that can easily be adopted by the experienced retropubic surgeon.
The common histopathologic subtypes of renal epithelial neoplasms include conventional, or clear cell, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, and renal oncocytoma. These subtypes differ clinically and pathologically, making accurate classification important. However, this differential diagnosis can be challenging because of overlapping morphology, suggesting a potential utility for ancillary immunohistochemical markers. We used cDNA microarrays to identify candidate markers for distinguishing renal tumor subtypes. In this report we validated differential expression of three candidate markers, beta defensin-1, parvalbumin, and vimentin, and evaluated the use of this immunohistochemical panel as a potential diagnostic tool. Consistent with our cDNA microarray data, chromophobe RCCs and oncocytomas exhibited similar expression profiles: 8 of 8 examples of each subtype were immunohistochemically positive for beta defensin-1 and parvalbumin and negative for vimentin (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%); 4 of 7 papillary RCCs were positive for beta defensin-1, parvalbumin, and vimentin (sensitivity 57%, specificity 97%); and 22 of 23 conventional RCCs were negative for beta defensin-1, parvalbumin, or both markers (sensitivity 96%, specificity 96%) as well as positive for vimentin (sensitivity 83%). The immunohistochemical panel distinguished renal tumor subtypes with greater specificity than any marker used alone. This work demonstrates that a useful panel of immunohistochemical markers can be derived from differential gene expression profiles determined using cDNA microarrays.
PURPOSE: Tuberous sclerosis is an autosomal dominant neurocutaneous syndrome affecting multiple organ systems and demonstrating highly variable clinical manifestations. Mutations in 2 tumor suppressor genes, TSC1 and TSC2, are linked to the evolution of the hamartomatous lesions. We describe the incidence and epidemiology, variable clinical manifestations and their relationships to renal pathology, and the management of morbid sequelae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the search term tuberous sclerosis, we performed a MEDLINE search of the literature identifying 3,196 articles and selected those from urological, surgical, oncological, genetic and pediatric journals. Special focus was placed on the incidence and management of renal lesions and on different clinical manifestations and how they relate to renal tumors. RESULTS: Due to improved identification of the variable phenotypic expression, the reported incidence has increased. TSC1 and TSC2 mutations are related to various phenotypic manifestations and risks of malignancy, such as an increased incidence of the TSC2 mutation in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Renal sparing surgery and selective embolization techniques have mitigated the morbidity of the lesions. CONCLUSIONS: We now have a better understanding of the variability at the genotypic and phenotypic levels of the disease. We recommend that patients with tuberous sclerosis complex be evaluated by a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, including urologists, dermatologists, neurologists, pediatricians and geneticists. Close attention to these manifestations is necessary to ensure appropriate treatment of the sequelae of the tuberous sclerosis complex.