PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Frazier Stevenson

Publications and source records attributed to Frazier Stevenson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions.

PURPOSE: Problem-based learning (PBL) is now used at many medical schools to promote lifelong learning, open inquiry, teamwork, and critical thinking. PBL has not been compared with other forms of discussion-based small-group learning. Case-based learning (CBL) uses a guided inquiry method and provides more structure during small-group sessions. In this study, we compared faculty and medical students' perceptions of traditional PBL with CBL after a curricular shift at two institutions. METHOD: Over periods of three years, the medical schools at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and the University of California, Davis (UCD) changed first-, second-, and third-year Doctoring courses from PBL to CBL formats. Ten months after the shift (2001 at UCLA and 2004 at UCD), students and faculty who had participated in both curricula completed a 24-item questionnaire about their PBL and CBL perceptions and the perceived advantages of each format RESULTS: A total of 286 students (86%-97%) and 31 faculty (92%-100%) completed questionnaires. CBL was preferred by students (255; 89%) and faculty (26; 84%) across schools and learner levels. The few students preferring PBL (11%) felt it encouraged self-directed learning (26%) and valued its greater opportunities for participation (32%). From logistic regression, students preferred CBL because of fewer unfocused tangents (59%, odds ration [OR] 4.10, P = .01), less busy-work (80%, OR 3.97, P = .01), and more opportunities for clinical skills application (52%, OR 25.6, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Learners and faculty at two major academic medical centers overwhelmingly preferred CBL (guided inquiry) over PBL (open inquiry). Given the dense medical curriculum and need for efficient use of student and faculty time, CBL offers an alternative model to traditional PBL small-group teaching. This study could not assess which method produces better practicing physicians.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Comparison of knowledge acquired by students in small-group seminars with and without a formal didactic component.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study compared student knowledge gain from using a CD-ROM-based lecture only, from attending small-group seminars only, and from using a combination of both methodologies. METHODS: During a required second-year case-based seminar about falls in the elderly, one third of the 96 second-year medical students were randomized into each of three study groups. One group viewed a 12-minute CD-ROM didactic presentation on falls in the elderly, another group participated in the small-group seminars, and the third group did both. All three groups took a pretest and posttest to assess any change in knowledge. The timing of the viewing of the CD-ROM and of the pretests and posttests were varied to test the effects of each modality separately and of the modalities combined. RESULTS: The difference between the pretest and the posttest scores was significantly different among groups. Post hoc analysis showed that the change from pretest to posttest was greater for students who participated in the combined modalities than in those who viewed the CD-ROM only or participated in case-based seminars only. DISCUSSION: The addition of a 12-minute CD-ROM on the topic to a small-group seminar appears to increase student knowledge of the material being taught.

Accidental Falls↗