PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Frederico Bruzzi de Carvalho

Publications and source records attributed to Frederico Bruzzi de Carvalho.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Use of low tidal volume in septic shock may decrease severity of subsequent acute lung injury.

Recent studies have indicated that protective lung strategies may improve outcomes in acute lung injury. We hypothesized that the use of a lower tidal volume early during septic shock may protect against the subsequent development of acute lung injury. Fourteen fasted, anesthetized, invasively monitored, mechanically ventilated, female sheep (26.4 +/- 4.5 kg) underwent cecal ligation and perforation to induce sepsis. Sheep were then randomized to ventilation with low (6 mL/kg) or high (12 mL/kg) tidal volumes. A positive end-expiratory pressure of 10 cm H(2)O was applied in each case. Ringer's lactate was titrated to maintain pulmonary artery occlusion pressure at baseline levels. No vasoactive agents or antibiotics were used. Survival time was longer in the low- than in the high-tidal-volume group (21.8 +/- 2.4 vs. 17.6 +/- 4.1 h, respectively, P < 0.05). The times to develop hypotension and anuria were longer in the low-tidal-volume group (18.1 +/- 3.1 vs. 12.0 +/- 2.8 h, P < 0.05, and 17.6 +/- 1.6 vs. 14.1 +/- 3.8 h, P < 0.05). Although the Pao2/Fio2 tended to be lower in the low- than in the high-tidal-volume group (P = 0.06), postmortem examination showed a lower lung tissue wet/dry ratio in the low- than in the high-tidal-volume group (7.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 9.1 +/- 0.7, P < 0.05). A low-tidal-volume ventilation strategy applied early during septic shock may be beneficial in terms of reducing the amount of lung edema and prolonging survival time.

Animals↗

Management of septic shock.

Severe sepsis is a common disease process affecting some 2-11% of hospital admissions in the US. Severe sepsis and septic shock are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, and account for a large part of intensive care unit costs. Until recently, the management of septic shock relied on the treatment of underlying infection with antimicrobial agents and surgical removal of any infectious source, and individual support of failing organs. However, in the last few years we have seen huge strides being made in our understanding of the pathophysiology of the sepsis response, and in our ability to manipulate that response. In the last couple of years these advances have come to fruition with the development of a drug, drotrecogin alfa, which specifically reduces mortality from this all too often fatal disease. While intensive early resuscitation remains the cornerstone of management, new approaches are beginning to form part of sepsis management protocols and will lead to improved outcomes for patients with this disease process.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗