Fumi Abiko | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Effect of N-terminal region of eIF4E and Ser65-phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 on interaction between eIF4E and 4E-BP1 fragment peptide.

To clarify the contribution of N-terminal region of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) to the interaction with 4E-BP and to investigate the effect of 4E-BP phosphorylation on the interaction with eIF4E, the interaction profiles of the Ser65-unphosphorylated and phosphorylated peptides (Thr37-Thr70 fragment of 4E-BP1) with full-length and N-terminal 33 residues-deleted eIF4Es were investigated by fluorescence and SPR methods. The effect of N-terminal region of eIF4E on the interaction with 4E-BP1 peptides was shown to be dependent on the interaction state, that is, the steady-state fluorescence and kinetic-state SRP analyses showed the positive and negative contributions of the N-terminal region to the interaction with the peptide, respectively, despite its unphosphorylated or phosphorylated state. The comparison of the association constants of the peptide with those of full-length 4E-BP1 indicated the importance of N-terminal (1-36) and/or C-terminal (71-118) sequence of 4E-BP1 for the interaction, although the MD simulations suggested that the alpha-helical region (Arg56-Cys62) of 4E-BP1 peptide is sufficient for keeping the interaction. The MD simulations also indicated that a charge-dependent rigid hydration shell formed around the phosphate group makes the molecular conformation rigid, and single Ser65 phosphorylation is insufficient for releasing 4E-PB1 peptide from eIF4E.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2005

Structural basis for mRNA Cap-Binding regulation of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E by 4E-binding protein, studied by spectroscopic, X-ray crystal structural, and molecular dynamics simulation methods.

Taking advantage of the Trp73 residue located close to the 4E-BP binding site of eIF4E, the interaction between the 4E-BP isoform and eIF4E was investigated by the Trp fluorescence titration method. Although no significant difference was observed among the association constants of three 4E-BP isoforms, the binding preference of 4E-BP2 over 4E-BP1 and -BP3 was shown, probably due to the effect of a 4E-BP2-specific LDRR (60-63) sequence for the binding with eIF4E. By contrast, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analyses showed the binding preference of 4E-BP1, although the difference among the isoforms was also not significant. This inconsistency with fluorescence analysis likely resulted from the different observation points of the interaction, i.e., local and overall interactions observed by the fluorescence and SPR methods, respectively. To clarify the structural basis for these spectroscopic results, the crystal structure of the ternary complex of m7GpppA-eIF4E-4E-BP1 fragment (Thr36-Thr70) was analyzed by the X-ray diffraction method. Crystal structure analysis at 2.1 A resolution revealed that the 4E-BP1 fragment, assigned to the Pro47-Pro66 peptide moiety, adopted a reverse L-shaped conformation involving the beta sheet and alpha-helical structures and was located at the root of the handle of the temple-bell-shaped eIF4E through hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions. Based on the observed binding mode, possible interactions with the three 4E-BP isoforms have been discussed. On the other hand, since the crystal structural comparison with the previously determined m7GpppA-eIF4E-4E binary complex showed that the docking of the 4E-BP1 fragment does not significantly affect the overall tertiary structure and cap-binding scaffold of eIF4E, the dynamic regulation of the cap-binding of eIF4E by 4E-BP1 was investigated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Consequently, the simulation suggested that (i) the helical region of the 4E-BP1 peptide is important for the binding with eIF4E, (ii) the existence of a cap structure stabilizes the binding of eIF4E with 4E-BP, (iii) the binding of 4E-BP stabilizes the cap-binding pocket of eIF4E, and (iv) the phosphorylation of Ser67 alone does not induce the separation of 4E-BP from eIF4E, but increases the structural rigidity of 4E-BP. These results provide the structural basis for the mRNA cap-binding regulation of eIF4E by 4E-BP.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗