PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Fumiaki Hamagami

Publications and source records attributed to Fumiaki Hamagami.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Structural equation models for evaluating dynamic concepts within longitudinal twin analyses.

A great deal of prior research using structural equation models has focused on longitudinal analyses and biometric analyses. Some of this research has even considered the simultaneous analysis of both kinds of analytic problems. The key benefits of these kinds of analyses come from the estimation of novel parameters, such as the heritability of changes. This paper discusses some recent extensions of longitudinal multivariate models that can be informative within biometric designs. In the methods section we review a previous latent growth structural equation analysis of the New York Twin (NYT) longitudinal data (from McArdle et al., 1998). In the models section we recast this growth model in terms of latent difference scores, add several new dynamic components, including coupling parameters, and consider biometric components and examine model stability. In the results section we present new univariate and bivariate dynamic estimates and tests of various dynamic hypotheses for the NYT data, and we consider a few ways to interpret the age-related biometric components of these models. In the discussion we consider our limitations and present suggestions for future dynamic-genetic research.

Humans↗

Comparative longitudinal structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span.

Latent growth curve techniques and longitudinal data are used to examine predictions from the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence (Gf-Gc theory; J. L. Horn & R. B. Cattell, 1966, 1967). The data examined are from a sample (N approximately 1,200) measured on the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised (WJ-R). The longitudinal structural equation models used are based on latent growth models of age using two-occasion "accelerated" data (e.g., J. J. McArdle & R. Q. Bell, 2000; J. J. McArdle & R. W. Woodcock, 1997). Nonlinear mixed-effects growth models based on a dual exponential rate yield a reasonable fit to all life span cognitive data. These results suggest that most broad cognitive functions fit a generalized curve that rises and falls. Novel multilevel models directly comparing growth curves show that broad fluid reasoning (Gf) and acculturated crystallized knowledge (Gc) have different growth patterns. In all comparisons, any model of cognitive age changes with only a single g factor yields an overly simplistic view of growth and change over age.

Adult↗