PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G A Coffey

Publications and source records attributed to G A Coffey.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Assessing case records using monitor criteria developed from consensus guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To develop criteria to enable the monitoring of general practitioner (GP) case records using consensus guidelines for conditions commonly managed in general practice and to measure how well the case records of a non random sample of GPs conformed to these criteria. METHOD: An iterative process was used to develop criteria from consensus guidelines for 19 conditions. Criteria were also developed to enable monitoring of the structure and content of the patient case record. A non random sample of GPs in Adelaide was approached to allow measurement of the content of their case records against these criteria. This measurement was undertaken by allied health professionals. An overall percentage score of conformity with the criteria was created for 10 acute, and six chronic conditions and for the patient case record review. These were rank ordered and Kendall's rank order correlation coefficients were used to compare the results in these three areas of practice. RESULTS: Criteria were successfully developed for each condition. Thirty-one GPs had their patient case records assessed. There was substantial variability between these practitioners in their conformity to the criteria. Kendall's rank order coefficients found statistically significant correlation between the results for acute and chronic conditions, and between acute conditions and the patient case record review section. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to develop criteria that enable measurement of the conformity of GP case records to these criteria. The overall level of conformity, together with the substantial variability found between practitioners suggest that there is a need for GPs to address this area of their practice.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1996

Development of consensus guidelines for conditions commonly managed in general practice. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: Initially, the project objective was to develop audit protocols for commonly managed conditions in general practice. However, as the nature of the project evolved these objectives changed to developing consensus guidelines. METHOD: An iterative process was undertaken using mail-outs to gain items for potential inclusion in an audit protocol. This resulted in a change of direction to management guidelines. Consensus, as to the validity of inclusion of items in each guideline, was then achieved by continuing to use an iterative process. RESULTS: Guidelines for 30 presenting complaints were developed. Because a number of differential diagnoses were possible for each complaint, a total of 105 guidelines were developed. A total of 263 general practitioners participated. CONCLUSION: The concept of discriminant actions was developed. It was agreed that this described the clinical decision making that occurs in the general practices of participating practitioners. It is feasible to use an iterative method undertaken by mail to develop consensus guidelines for conditions that are commonly managed by general practitioners.

Australia↗
PubMed1993

The effect of prazosin on patients with symptoms of benign prostatic hypertrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of prazosin on the symptoms of benign prostatic hypertrophy for patients of general practitioners. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Eighty-two general practitioner patients from 317 who were identified as being eligible for inclusion in the trial. They were randomly allocated to receive either prazosin or placebo for the first 3 month arm then crossed-over for the second 3 months. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients completed the trial. An analogue scale of patient rating of symptoms showed a statistically significant decrease in symptoms for patients taking prazosin when compared with patients taking placebo, regardless of the order in which they had been administered. A total symptom score and an obstructive symptom score for benign prostatic hypertrophy showed a statistically significant difference between the two treatments at 4 weeks. A difference was still apparent at 8 and 12 weeks but it was not statistically significant. No difference was detected for irritative symptoms. CONCLUSION: Prazosin may have a limited place in the management of benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

South Australian hypertension survey. General practitioner experiences with drug treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate prescribing habits, educational approaches and perceived needs of general practitioners in the drug treatment of hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Of 156 randomly selected South Australian general practitioners 132 responded to a questionnaire survey. MAIN FINDINGS: Diuretics are the most commonly chosen drug for the initial management of uncomplicated moderate hypertension. Equivalent patients aged 45, 60 and 75 years would be prescribed a diuretic as drug of first choice in 41%, 55% and 68% of cases respectively. Despite this, there are wide differences in the choice of initial therapy between individual practitioners. These differences can have a substantial cost impact, given that in Australia the cost of diuretic therapy for one month can be as low as $1.97 compared with $34.08 for standard angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy for one month. There was also a perceived need, and demand, for patient education materials to assist practitioners in the drug treatment of hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

South Australian hypertension survey. General practitioner knowledge and reported management practices--a cause for concern?

OBJECTIVE: To survey South Australian general practitioners to investigate their knowledge and reported management of patients with hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Of 156 randomly selected SA general practitioners 132 responded to a questionnaire survey. RESULTS: This survey showed substantial differences between general practitioners in their knowledge about hypertension and in their reported practices for diagnostic levels, investigations to be undertaken once diagnosis had been made, levels at which pharmaceutical treatment should be initiated, at which level treatment was regarded as having attained satisfactory control, and length of time for routine review. There was also a demand for materials to be provided to assist in the management of this important condition. CONCLUSIONS: There is a perceived need for better and more appropriate educational materials and a need for a different approach to try and reduce the reported variability in management of patients with hypertension by general practitioners.

Aged↗