PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G A Kraan

Publications and source records attributed to G A Kraan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Extraforaminal ligament attachments of human lumbar nerves.

STUDY DESIGN: An anatomic study of the extraforaminal attachments of the lumbar spinal nerves was performed using human lumbar spinal columns. OBJECTIVES: To identify and describe the existence of ligamentous structures at each lumbar level that attach lumbar spinal nerves to structures at the level of the extraforaminal region. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: During the last 120 years, several mechanisms to protect the spinal nerve against traction have been described. All these structures involved are located in the spinal canal, proximal to the intervertebral foramen. METHODS: Five embalmed human lumbar spines (T12-S1) were used. Bilaterally, the extraforaminal region was dissected to describe and measure anatomic structures and their relationships. Histology was performed with staining on the sites of attachment and along the ligament. RESULTS: The levels T12-L2 show bilaterally 2 ligaments, a superior extraforaminal ligament and an inferior extraforaminal ligament. The superior extraforaminal ligament emerges from the joint capsule of the facet joints and inserts in both, the intervertebral disc and the ventral crista of the intervertebral foramen, passing the spinal nerve laterally. In one specimen on level L2-L3, the superior extraforaminal ligament is not attached to the spinal nerve. The inferior extraforaminal ligament emerges from the intervertebral disc, passing the nerve medially and attaching the spinal nerve. At the levels L2-L5, the inferior extraforaminal ligaments are only attached to the intervertebral disc, not to the joint capsule. Histologically, the ligaments consisted of mainly collagenous structures. CONCLUSION: Ligamentous connections exist between lumbar extraforaminal spinal nerves and nearby structures.

Aged, 80 and over↗

Starting from standing; why step backwards?

At push-off, the mass centre of gravity of the body must be positioned in front of the foot to prevent a somersault. When starting a sprint from out the standing position the use of a step backwards is necessary for maximal acceleration. The aim of the present study was to quantify the positive contribution to push off from a backward step of the leg, which seems to be counterproductive. Ten subjects were instructed to sprint start in three different ways: (a) starting from the standing position just in front of the force platform on the subject's own initiative, (b) starting from the standing position on the force platform with no step backward allowed, and (c) starting out of the starting position with one leg in front of the force platform and the push-off leg on the force platform. A step backwards was observed in 95% of the starts from the standing position. The push-off force was highest in starting type (a), which had the shortest time to build up the push-off force. The results indicate a positive contribution to the force and power from a step backwards. We advocate developing a training program with special attention to the phenomenon step backwards.

Adult↗

[Experiences of relatives of donors with the donation procedure; comparison between 1995 and 1998].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the experience of the relatives of organ and tissue donors, immediately before, during and soon after the donation procedure. DESIGN: Questionnaire. METHOD: At two national one-day meetings at which about 10% of the families of donors between 1991 and 1998 were represented, the participants completed a questionnaire with questions about their appreciation of the communication with the different health care professionals. The appreciation was scored on a 7-point scale. RESULTS: Most relatives looked back with satisfaction on the events in the hospital and soon thereafter; the appreciation was 'a little satisfied' to 'satisfied'. The relatives in non-heart-beating kidney transplantation were more satisfied compared to those confronted with the brain death transplantation, with regard to the conversation in which the death was announced as well as to the conversation regarding the donation procedure. Relatives in 1998 were more positive about some specific aspects than in 1995, notably concerning explanation of the phenomenon of brain death. Satisfaction was primarily influenced by the way in which the news of death was conveyed and the aftercare by the transplant coordinator. The moment donation was addressed and the moment the relatives said 'good-bye' to their beloved were the next important factors.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗