Biomedical subjects

G A Tangen

Publications and source records attributed to G A Tangen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Image-guided laparoscopic surgery. Review and current status.

The main drawback with laparoscopic surgery is that the surgeon is unable to palpate vessels, tumours and organs during surgery. Further-more, the laparoscope only provides a surface view of organs. There is a need for more advanced visualizations techniques that can enhance the display presented to the surgeon so that important information below the surface of the organs is included when planning the procedure as well as for guidance and control during treatment. In this paper, we present a review of the literature and the state of art within image-guided laparoscopic surgery. We describe our own experience using a prototype navigation system for advanced visualizations and guidance during laparoscopic procedures in the retroperitoneum. Furthermore, we show sample images from the Future Operating Room for laparoscopic surgery in Trondheim, where this technology is being further developed and tested in clinical studies. Our system is based on three-dimensional navigation technology, i.e. preoperatively acquired magnetic resonance or computed tomography data used in combination with tracked instruments, allowing the surgeon to interactively control the display of images prior to and during surgery with normal use of the instruments. In summary, we believe that abdominal image navigation using tracked instruments and advanced visualizations has a large potential for improving future laparoscopic surgery, especially in cases where vessels and anatomical relations beyond surfaces is difficult to identify using only a laparoscope. The technology helps the surgeon to better understand the anatomy and locate blood vessels. Accordingly, we believe that this new technology could increase safety and make it easier for the surgeon to perform successful laparoscopic surgery.

Diagnostic Imaging↗

PubMed2004

Laparoscopic navigation pointer for three-dimensional image-guided surgery.

BACKGROUND: The main drawback with the laparoscopic approach is that the surgeon is unable to palpate vessels, tumors, and organs during surgery. Furthermore, the laparoscope provides only surface view of organs. There is a need for more advanced visualizations that can enhance the view to include information below the surface of the organs for planning of the procedure and for control and guidance during treatment. METHODS: We propose three-dimensional (3D) navigation technology based on preoperatively acquired magnetic resonance or computed tomography data used in combination with a laparoscopic navigation pointer (LNP). The LNP has an attached position tracker that allows the surgeon to control the display of images interactively before and during surgery. This study evaluated the patient registration accuracy, the feasibility of image-based navigation and, qualitatively, the navigation precision in the retroperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: This technology was used during the treatment of six patients (involving adrenalectomies and a neuroma protruding into the pelvis). An average patient registration accuracy of 6.90 mm was achieved. The precision during navigation in the retroperitoneum was, in some cases, better than the patient registration accuracy suggested. The technology helped the surgeons to understand better the anatomy and to locate blood vessels. CONCLUSIONS: In the reported cases, the LNP was a useful tool for image guidance in laparoscopic surgery, both for planning the surgical approach in detail and for guidance. The authors believe that adominal 3D image guidance using an LNP has a large potential for improving laparoscopic surgery, especially when vessels and anatomic relations may be difficult to identify using only a laparoscope. Accordingly, they believe this new technology could increase safety and make it easier for the surgeon to perform successful laparoscopic surgery.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2003

3D ultrasound-based navigation for radiofrequency thermal ablation in the treatment of liver malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare three methods for ultrasound-based guidance of a radiofrequency probe into liver tumors in a model setup. METHODS: The liver model tumors were placed inside excised calf livers, and the radiofrequency probe was guided into the center using either a new 3D navigation method or two conventional 2D methods-freehand scanning and a method based on a biopsy guide. We performed 54 experiments, measuring the physical distance (all methods) and image distance (3D method only) from the tip of the probe to the center of the tumors. RESULTS: Based on the physical measurements alone, the biopsy-based guiding performed better than both the 2D freehand and the 3D navigation method. However, the 3D image measurements showed that the tip of the probe was better positioned in the center of the model tumors for the 3D navigation method as compared to the physical measurement results for the 2D methods. CONCLUSION: Although it was easier to position the radiofrequency probe accurately using the 3D image display technique, movement of the model tumor during 3D navigation is a challenge.

Animals↗