PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G A Woodward

Publications and source records attributed to G A Woodward.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Procedures performed by pediatric transport nurses: how "advanced" is the practice?

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric interfacility transport teams often rely on advanced practice nurses as primary care providers. These individuals may be required to transport patients without the presence of a physician. There is, however, little information in the medical literature regarding how frequently advanced practice transport nurses perform advanced procedures, how often these procedures are successfully performed, and the rate of complications associated with nurse-performed procedures. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine how frequently advanced practice transport nurses were called on to perform advanced procedures and to determine the nurses' procedural success and complication rates. DESIGN: Prospective convenience sample of consecutive pediatric interfacility transports. METHODS: Transport nurses collected data on 336 pediatric interfacility transports that were performed during a 4-month period beginning in May 1997. All patient transports occurring during the study period were included. Data regarding procedures were recorded on data collection sheets. This data included the type of procedure performed, the outcome of the procedure, and the complications associated with the procedure. The number of attempts required to successfully complete the procedure was not recorded. During or after the patient's hospitalization, the medical record was reviewed to identify potential complications related to the transport that may not have been recorded on the data collection sheet. RESULTS: Nurses performed 95.2% of transports without the presence of a physician. Twenty-six patients (8.8%) required advanced procedures. Nurses performed eight tracheal intubations. Personnel at the referring hospital performed the remaining procedures. All tracheal intubations by transport nurses were successful. There were no complications related to these procedures. All patients were transported to the receiving hospital without incident. CONCLUSIONS: Although they had considerable training for advanced procedures, the transport nurses rarely used these skills. All tracheal intubations performed by transport nurses were successful, and there were no adverse consequences related to intubation by a transport nurse.

Ambulances↗

Should parents accompany pediatric interfacility ground ambulance transports? The parent's perspective.

Parental accompaniment can be a positive experience for the parent and the patient, as perceived by the parent. It can also be accomplished effectively without hindering the delivery of intratransport medical care by a nurse/nurse or nurse/physician transport team. This survey, along with the responses from other parents, led our team to adopt the position that a parent is welcome and encouraged to accompany the transport team if he or she wishes to. The team has recognized the importance of the family unit during the stressful period surrounding an acute medical issue and interfacility transport. The transport team reserves the option to ask that a parent not ride along if they suspect the parent might not function as a supportive team member (ie, the parent is belligerent, inebriated, or hostile). The parent normally rides in the passenger seat of the ambulance, and we encourage him or her to interact with the patient as much as possible. Occasionally parents ride in the back of the ambulance if the patient's situation allows for that option (ie, no anticipated need for potential interventions, number of team personnel, etc.).

Adolescent↗

Diabetes and transport: a potentially bittersweet combination.

These cases represent a portion of the spectrum of medical issues that may be seen in patients with a diagnosis of IDDM. As the first case suggests, knowledge of the disease process and an expanded differential diagnosis is imperative when acting as medical command for these patients. Interfacility transport does not only involve rapid and safe transport between institutions, but must also offer the highest level of expertise available for the referring physician and the patient. For this reason, we recommend the immediate availability of a senior level experienced pediatric physician for involvement in all but the most routine pediatric interfacility transports. Rapid recognition at the time of initial presentation or transport of the correct diagnosis in patient one may have altered potential outcome. Case 2 represents a potential untoward outcome which might be potentiated or exacerbated by the care given during transport. Although this patient's transport time was short, a similar patient may present who needs prolonged transport. The patient might also present to the transport service prior to neurologic deterioration. One must be prepared to intervene for all potential complications as they arise. Case 3 represents a patient whose physical examination suggested more intense therapy was needed than is offered by many DKA protocols. It is important to listen to what the patients are trying to tell us, rather than relying strictly on protocols or guidelines. While protocols or guidelines offer a menu of potential therapies, one must be prepared to vary from these guidelines if suggested by the patient's condition. Recognition of delayed capillary refill in patient 3 allowed for an increase in fluid administration and rapid patient improvement. While not evident with the presented short transports, the use of point of care testing in a transport vehicle can be useful for these types of patients. The opportunity to closely monitor blood chemistry evaluations and gasses can give insight about an ongoing process, suggest therapies, and help direct interventions that, in the past, often waited until the patient arrived at the receiving hospital. That additional information can be invaluable for the ill patient whose outcome may hinge on early recognition of subtle changes with subsequent appropriate interventions.

Brain Edema↗

The utility of head computed tomographic scanning in pediatric patients with normal neurologic examination in the emergency department.

Head injury is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric trauma. Guidelines for obtaining computed tomographic (CT) scans in the child with mild head injury are poorly defined. This study investigated the utility of head CT scanning in the pediatric patient presenting with normal neurologic examination. All patients undergoing head CT scanning for trauma in the emergency department (ED) at a tertiary care pediatric trauma center during 1992 were identified (508). Charts were reviewed for historical and physical examination findings, CT results, and need for neurosurgical intervention. Patients were excluded if they had an abnormal neurologic examination (179), known depressed skull fracture (11), bleeding diathesis (3), age older than 18 years (1), or developmental delay (1). Included were 313 patients (median 5.5 years) who presented with clinical variables including sleepiness (38%), vomiting (34%), headache (30%), loss of consciousness (LOC) (25%), irritability (22%), amnesia (20%), and seizures (8%). An abnormal head CT was noted in 88 cases (28%); 79 (25%) were traumatic abnormalities involving the skull and/or contents. Thirteen patients (4%) had intracranial injuries (ICI); all had either a linear (10), basilar (2), or depressed (1) skull fracture noted on CT. Four patients required neurosurgery, three for epidural hematoma, and one for a complicated orbital fracture (without ICI). No clinical variables (seizure, LOC, vomiting, headache, confusion, irritability, sleepiness, amnesia) were associated with ICI (P > 0.05). In pediatric head trauma patients, with normal neurologic examinations in the ED, ICI occurs < 5% of the time and neurosurgery is needed in 1% of the cases. Commonly used clinical variables are not associated with ICI in these children.

Acute Disease↗

Evaluating the effectiveness of a pediatric trauma educational program in Central America.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a pediatric trauma course taught in a developing country. STUDY DESIGN: A pediatric trauma course was designed with didactic presentations and reinforced with small group case discussions. Subjects included a general trauma overview, head trauma, airway/chest trauma, cervical spine trauma, abdominal trauma, shock, burns, and orthopedic injuries. Evaluation consisted of a pre- and post-course test and questionnaire assessing the participants' knowledge and level of comfort in managing trauma. Nine months after the course, the participants were evaluated with the same post-course test. Also a questionnaire was given to physician and nurse co-workers from the participating institutions, who themselves had not participated in the course, to assess the perceptual and attitudinal impact of the pediatric trauma course. SETTING: Guatemala City, Guatemala. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three physicians from Central America. RESULTS: Initial and nine-month post-test scores showed uniform improvement (P value < 0.05) when compared to pretest results using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Analysis of the pre- and post-course questionnaires indicated that all participants felt more comfortable (scale 1 to 5) after the course managing pediatric trauma patients. All participants "strongly agreed" the course provided information that would improve their management of the pediatric trauma victim. Nine months after the course, 100% of their medical co-workers perceived physicians who participated in the pediatric trauma course to have better resuscitative skills, and 92% perceived these physicians to have a higher level of confidence. CONCLUSION: This course, when presented to physicians in a developing country, appears to be effective in improving their knowledge base regarding pediatric trauma and increasing their comfort level in managing major pediatric trauma.

Central America↗

Delayed diagnosis of injury in pediatric trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To define the frequency and nature of delayed diagnosis of injury (DDI) in pediatric trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric trauma center. METHODS: Medical records of 1175 pediatric trauma admissions from July 1, 1989, through June 30, 1992, were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty (4.3%) patients had 53 DDI. Fractures accounted for 38 DDI, most commonly of the extremities (total, 16). The delay until injury diagnosis ranged from 1 to 55 (median, 3) days. Patients with DDI had lower scores on the Glasgow Coma Scale, higher injury severity scores, and longer pediatric intensive care unit and hospital stays than patients without DDI. Patients with DDI more frequently required medical transport, emergent intubation, admission to the pediatric intensive care unit, and surgery. The DDI altered treatment for 68% of patients; 10 required surgery, including second operations for 6 children. CONCLUSIONS: DDI represents a failure of pediatric trauma care at all levels. The severely injured child is at the greatest risk of DDI. All pediatric patients with trauma warrant ongoing evaluation to identify initially unrecognized injuries.

Adolescent↗

Blunt pediatric laryngotracheal trauma: case reports and review of the literature.

Blunt laryngotracheal trauma can be a life-threatening event. Two cases of isolated blunt laryngotracheal trauma in pediatric patients are presented. One case involves a 12-year-old mate who suffered isolated tracheal trauma from a fall. He developed respiratory distress and required a tracheostomy. Intraoperatively he was noted to have a thyroid cartilage fracture. The other case involves a 14-year-old female who was kicked in the neck by a horse. After unsuccessful intubation attempts that completed a tracheal transection, she required an emergency cricothyrotomy and a subsequent tracheostomy. The diagnosis, differential diagnosis, associated injuries, and treatment options for blunt laryngeal trauma are reviewed.

Accidental Falls↗

Trampolines revisited: a review of 114 pediatric recreational trampoline injuries.

A search of the medical literature failed to reveal any articles that discuss pediatric injuries acquired on privately owned recreational trampolines. This study was undertaken to quantify and qualify pediatric injuries from recreational trampoline use. A group of 114 patients who presented to the Emergency Department at Primary Children's Medical Center in Salt Lake City, Utah, with injuries directly related to use of a trampoline are discussed. There was a 1.2:1 male-female ratio. The average age was 8.0 years. Forty-eight percent of the patients were injured on their family's trampoline, with the remainder injured on a friend's, neighbor's, relative's, or gymnasium's equipment. The majority of injuries involved group use of the trampoline and the youngest person in a group was most often the injured participant. Extremity injuries were seen in 55% of the patient and head or neck injuries in 37%. Seventy-five percent of the patients required radiographs, 23% hospitalization, and 17% operative intervention. The history of the trampoline and medical literature discussions concerning injuries and safety are reviewed.

Athletic Injuries↗