PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Bertelè

Publications and source records attributed to G Bertelè.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Mandibular distraction of the body and ramus.

With the ever increasing interest in the field of osteodistraction techniques, the mandible is certainly the most studied anatomical site, both experimentally and clinically. Currently, the methods of mandibular distraction can be classified by position (intra- or extraoral), by the direction of distraction and by the site of application (toothborn, boneborn or hybrid fixation). To guarantee good results from the osteodistraction procedure, it is fundamental to have an accurate preoperative plan considering the correct classification and evaluation of the patient combined with a valid project regarding the direction of the distraction vector. One of the most important aspects to consider is the orientation of the distractor, especially if the defect to be corrected is three-dimensional. Regarding the correct planning of the operation, knowing the secondary effects of the distraction on the soft tissues, muscles and nerves, the temporomandibular joint and velopharyngeal functioning is of fundamental importance. It is worth considering particular situations in which osteodistraction is extremely helpful in maxillofacial surgery, for example in the construction of a neocondyle, in bone replacement during oncologic interventions, in obstructive sleep apnea correction and in hemi-mandibular reconstruction.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Osteodistraction in the craniofacial region.

In the specific field of maxillofacial surgery, the use of osseous distraction is always more and more helpful not only in the rehabilitation of malformation pathologies, but also in the clinical situations that require bone deficit correction resulting from traumatic events and postsurgical effects, for example oncologic surgery. The reason for this versatility in the distraction protocols is, undoubtedly, due to the fact that, at present, they are valid surgical methods in alternative to or supporting maxillofacial surgery, since they are feasible from a very early age and they obtain a level of distraction that is often higher than with orthopedic devices or conventional surgery. There are multiple indications for osteodistraction and they range from cases of hyper- or hypodevelopment of the maxilla and mandible, of both their anteroposterior and transverse components, to complex syndromes such as cleft lip and palate. Even the clinical distraction of the upper and middle thirds of the cranium, through a coronal craniotomy, has been shown to be a safe surgical procedure and it allows, for example, the successful rehabilitation of adult patients suffering from hemifacial microsomia or craniosynostosis. With the continuous and constant evolution of the integration of osteodistraction principles in the rehabilitation of the craniofacial region, an ever-more effective interdisciplinary relationship between orthodontics and osteodistraction has been seen with growing interest. More often treatment plans are programmed in which the orthodontic and osteodistractive phases are integrated and complete each other, each supporting the other. Scientific and clinical progress achieved in this field in recent years, allows more and more refined therapeutic solutions to be programmed, permitting craniofacial operations and to repair an ankylotic dental arch or reposition osteointegrated implants to the most convenient bone sites.

Craniofacial Abnormalities↗
PubMed1999

Structural dentofacial variations in maxilla expansion.

BACKGROUND: The control of vertical dimension is important in those subjects who need a correction of the maxillary transversal diameters, in order to project a correct therapeutical plan and not to make worse an eventual contemporary long-face. This research intends to consider the vertical dimension changes of the cranio-facial middle third caused by palatal expansion, in relation to technique and patient's age. METHODS: We have compared orthodontic-orthopedic expansion both with elastic appliances ("w" expansion palatal arch), stiff ones (Hyrax-type appliance) and surgically assisted expansion which combines the action of Hyrax-type appliance with a bilateral corticotomy of zygomatic buttress. Among treatments of this kind which have been carried out in Odontological Clinic of University of Verona, we have selected three groups of subjects who have been treated with orthopedic expansion the first one in infantile age, the second one in adult age, and the third one with surgically assisted expansion. At the end of the treatment, we have evaluated dimension changes of the cranio-facial third middle caused by therapy, with the aid of a cephalometric analysis made on purpose. RESULTS: The results obtained are similar in the case of orthopedic expansion in young people and in surgically assisted expansion, while the increase of vertical dimension caused by the orthopedics expansion in grown-up people is more substantial. CONCLUSIONS: Considering these data, it appears that the surgically assisted expansion is more effectual and physiological for the correction of transversal deficiencies of maxilla in grown-up people.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Functional therapy of Class II Division 1. Comparison of three activators: Andresen, Fränkel and Teuscher].

BACKGROUND: A comparative study is reported about the efficiency of three activators (Andresen, Fränkel and Teuscher) in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusions in a group of patients with different facial types. METHODS: A group of 20 patients in mixed dentition has been selected. The subjects were between 8 and 14 years old, provided with a complete radiographic documentation, treated in the Odontological Clinic of the University of Verona for a period no longer than 24 months. The study has been made using a cephalometric informatic program with a graphic computer. After a revision of orthopaedic functional literature, cephalometric values which, according to personal opinion, reflect the modifications occurred during treatment and growth have been chosen. Then these values have been reported in a triplic analytic configuration. RESULTS: The achieved results in each group of patients with the three activators have been examined analyzing structural modifications produced in the skeletric and in the dento-alveolar region. The comparison between the results obtained with the three activators and the findings reported in the majority of literature hasn't shown great disagreements. CONCLUSIONS: In the correction of Class II Division 1 malocclusions Andresen appliance is valid in subjects with normal/hypodivergent skeletric structure, while in patients with a facial type tending to "dolicocephal" the Fränkel function regulator and, in particular, Teuscher activator combined with extraoral traction have produced positive results with a contemporary correction of the sagittal skeletric discrepance.

Activator Appliances↗