Melphalan vs polymelphalanum in ovarian cancer patients resistant to cyclophosphamide: a tentative statistical approach to balance risks and benefits.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Bolis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Preoperative CA 125 levels were measured in 36 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma in clinical response undergoing a second-look operation. All the patients had positive levels (greater than 35 U/ml) of this tumor marker at diagnosis. The correlation between antigen levels and disease status at surgery revealed a sensitivity of this assay of 0.55 (only 11/20 patients still with tumor had positive levels) and a specificity of 0.94 (15/16 patients with no tumor had less than 35 U/ml). The predictive value of a positive test was 0.92. This method unfortunately proved unable to recognize microscopic residual tumor burden, less than 0.5 cm.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Twenty-five patients treated with debulking surgery and chemotherapy for ovarian cancer were prospectively studied to evaluate the efficacy of radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) in detecting residual tumor before second-look surgery. RIS was performed with the monoclonal antibody OC125 F(ab')2 labelled with I-131 without knowledge of clinical data and compared with subsequent surgical results. Second look showed tumor persistence in 12 patients, mostly characterized by small lesions. The overall diagnostic sensitivity of RIS was 50% and the specificity was 85%. In particular, RIS showed better sensitivity for pelvic tumor localizations than for abdominal sites (73% vs 33%); this was due to the inability of RIS to detect upper abdominal lesions. Therefore, our conclusion is that, at present, RIS cannot substitute surgical second-look in the management of ovarian cancer, however, considering that also ultrasonography, computer tomography and magnetic resonance are not always able to give definite diagnostic evidence in the follow-up of ovarian carcinoma, RIS could be added to these procedures to balance the limitations of each method. In this regard, the best application of RIS could be in the follow-up of patients with marker elevation without clinical evidence of disease, especially in the case of pelvic fibrosis or adhesions due to previous therapy, where the other non-invasive tools can give doubtful diagnostic results.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.