Biomedical subjects

G Bowman

Publications and source records attributed to G Bowman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1990

Independence and status--two different work methods.

This paper describes a study to establish whether there were hidden benefits from the changes occurring in nursing work methods. Of particular interest were the feelings of independence and status of qualified nursing staff operating within two discrete work environments, namely a) primary nursing, b) task allocation nursing. A nine item questionnaire with Likert scale was used as the measure. It was hypothesised that those nurses working with primary nursing would 1) feel more independence and, 2) have a higher sense of status than their counterparts in the traditional task-centred environment.

Female↗

PubMed1989

Education: key areas of change needed in nursing.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Curriculum↗

PubMed1989

Ward leadership styles.

The purpose of this study was to devise a leadership style scale based in the authoritarian/democratic concept of leadership and to test it with a group of nurses. The working hypothesis was that nurses, working by primary nursing methods, would have a more democratic attitude to leadership than those nurses working in a traditional task allocation system. Recent papers such as that of Henry & Tuxill (1) plead for the caring professions to take on board the concept of the 'person'. Not only is the traditional model of nursing care seen as bad for the patient; it is seen also as harmful to the nurses. Fretwell (2) describes the task system as essentially an industrial model rather than a professional one which tends to satisfy the needs of the doctor rather than the patient or nurse. Kinston (3) describes nursing decision-making and work as Level I work (tradesmen). Current models of care that individualize the nurse's response to work and decision-making become Level II type (professional). Primary nursing fulfils the need for professionalizing nursing and meeting the need for more independence as well as respecting the patient as a 'person' with the organisation there to facilitate interaction between qualified nurse and patient. Changes in attitude and relationships are essential if work is to change from task to person-centred. Styles of leadership in nurses need to alter as our orientation to care issues change (4).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hospital Units↗

PubMed1988

The comparative value of noninvasive testing for diagnosis and surveillance of deep vein thrombosis.

This is a prospective analysis of 351 patients in two distinct groups undergoing ascending phlebography, impedance plethysmography (IPG), and/or phleborheography (PRG) within the same 24-hour period. One hundred twenty patients also had a 125I-fibrinogen uptake test (RFUT). The two patient groups consisted of the following: those patients evaluated because of suspicion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (diagnostic) and those patients at high risk for postoperative DVT (total joint replacement) who had routine noninvasive testing and ascending phlebography (surveillance). The overall sensitivities for IPG and PRG were significantly better in the diagnosis group (71% [69 of 97 patients] and 78% [82 of 105], respectively) compared with the surveillance group (20% [14 of 71] and 27% [17 of 63], respectively) (p less than 0.0001). The sensitivities for IPG and PRG detecting proximal (A/K) thrombi was 83% (68 of 82 patients) and 92% (79 of 86) in the diagnosis group compared with 32% (11 of 34) and 33% (9 of 27) in the surveillance group (p less than 0.0001). Although there was no difference in overall incidence of DVT between the diagnosis group (56%, 118 of 212 patients) and the surveillance group (55%, 76 of 139), the results can be explained by the difference in A/K thrombi (84% [99 of 118] and 47% [36 of 76]) (p less than 0.001) and occlusive A/K thrombi (84% [58 of 69] and 23% [7 of 31]) (p less than 0.0001), respectively. Of the patients with A/K thrombi, 97% (67 of 69) in the diagnosis group had hemodynamically detectable thrombi compared with only 48% (12 of 25) in the surveillance group (p less than 0.001). Combining the RFUT with the noninvasive studies for surveillance significantly improved the sensitivity for both A/K and distal thrombi. Patient selection also appears to have a significant influence on the results of the combination of IPG and RFUT when the current surveillance group is compared with similarly performed studies in a previously reported diagnosis group. The location and magnitude of thrombi in any patient population can be skewed depending on indications and timing of testing, thereby significantly affecting the sensitivity of noninvasive tests. IPG and PRG are reliable for evaluating patients with suspected DVT. However, patients with postoperative DVT have a high incidence of nonocclusive thrombi. Because noninvasive hemodynamic tests cannot identify accurately postoperative DVT, they cannot be used to generate epidemiologic data or as end points for studies evaluating efficacy of prophylaxis in patients undergoing total joint replacement, and anatomic studies of the deep venous system continue to be required.

Fibrinogen↗

PubMed1979