PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

G C Flaker

Publications and source records attributed to G C Flaker.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Ejection fraction by radionuclide ventriculography and contrast left ventriculogram. A tale of two techniques. SAVE Investigators. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the abilities of two methods to measure ejection fraction (EF)-radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) and contrast left ventriculography (Cath-EFa) to predict cardiovascular events. BACKGROUND: Both RVG and Cath-EFa are commonly used methods to measure left ventricular performance and assess prognosis. Their comparative abilities to predict clinical events have not been reported. METHODS: Both RVG EF and Cath-EFa were measured within 16 days of myocardial infarction (MI) in 688 patients. The results were divided into terciles. Prognosis by terciles was assessed for each technique. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine which EF measurement was a better predictor of prognosis. RESULTS: Average RVG-EF was 32%+/-7, while Cath-EFa was 42%+/-10. Both RVG and Cath-EFa were poorly correlated (R=0.42). Event rate declined across terciles with increasing EF for both techniques (events in lowest to highest tercile of Cath-EFa 40.7%, 25.9%, 11.6%, p < 0.001; and RVG-EF 39.9%, 26.1%, 15.6%, p < 0.001). There was concordance of terciles in 303 of 688 patients (44%). When patients in the highest RVG terciles were in the highest Cath-EFa tercile, the event rate was 7%. However, when patients in the highest RVG terciles were in the lowest Cath-EFa tercile, the event rate was 19%. Both Cath-EFa (p < 0.001) and RVG-EF (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Ejection fraction measured by RVG or during catheterization is a valuable tool in the risk stratification of postinfarct patients. When disagreement is present between clinical impression and measurement by either method, the use of an alternative measurement is warranted and complementary.

Adult

Underutilization of antithrombotic therapy in elderly rural patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic agents are underutilized in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. In a peer-review audit of antithrombotic use in Missouri, rural patients were given antithrombotic therapy less often than rural patients for unclear reasons. METHODS AND RESULTS: The charts of 597 hospitalized Medicare patients discharged between October 1, 1993, and December 31, 1994, from urban and rural hospitals in Missouri were reviewed. In addition to antithrombotic therapy prescribed at the time of discharge, patient and physician information, relative contraindications to antithrombotic therapy, and risk factors for stroke were identified. Rural and urban patients were similar in terms of age, sex, and risk factors for stroke. At least one stroke risk factor was noted in 87% of rural patients and in 84% of urban patients. Urban patients were more likely to have a relative contraindication to antithrombotic therapy compared with rural patients (66% vs 54%, P =.04) but received antithrombotic therapy more often (58% vs 47%, P =.02). Cardiologists prescribed antithrombotic therapy significantly more often than noncardiologists (69% vs 52%, P =.003). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly rural patients with atrial fibrillation receive antithrombotic therapy less frequently than urban patients despite having a similar high-risk profile and fewer relative contraindications. Primary care physicians prescribe antithrombotic therapy less often than cardiologists, which is one of the reasons for this underutilization.

Aged

Inflammation, pravastatin, and the risk of coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Investigators.

BACKGROUND: We studied whether inflammation after myocardial infarction (MI) is a risk factor for recurrent coronary events and whether randomized treatment with pravastatin reduces that risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: A nested case-control design was used to compare C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) levels in prerandomization blood samples from 391 participants in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial who subsequently developed recurrent nonfatal MI or a fatal coronary event (cases) and from an equal number of age- and sex-matched participants who remained free of these events during follow-up (control subjects). Overall, CRP and SAA were higher among cases than control subjects (for CRP P=0.05; for SAA P=0.006) such that those with levels in the highest quintile had a relative risk (RR) of recurrent events 75% higher than those with levels in the lowest quintile (for CRP RR= 1.77, P=0.02; for SAA RR= 1.74, P=0.02). The study group with the highest risk was that with consistent evidence of inflammation (elevation of both CRP and SAA) who were randomly assigned to placebo (RR=2.81, P=0.007); this risk estimate was greater than the product of the individual risks associated with inflammation or placebo assignment alone. In stratified analyses, the association between inflammation and risk was significant among those randomized to placebo (RR=2.11, P=0.048) but was attenuated and nonsignificant among those randomized to pravastatin (RR=1.29, P=0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of inflammation after MI is associated with increased risk of recurrent coronary events. Therapy with pravastatin may decrease this risk, an observation consistent with a nonlipid effect of this agent.

Aged

Comparison of right- and left-sided pectoral implantation parameters with the Jewel active can cardiodefibrillator. The World Wide Jewel Investigators.

A total of 1,207 patients received a Medtronic Jewel active can ICD (models 7218C, 7219C), with a Transvene lead in 97 centers in Europe and North America. Nineteen implants were from the right pectoral region. Patients with right-sided ICDs did not differ in terms of mean age, % male, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association Functional Class, antiarrhythmic drug therapy, indication for the implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and R wave values at implantation, but tended to have slightly higher pacing thresholds (1.2 +/- 0.5 V vs 1.0 +/- 0.6 V, P = 0.012) and higher defibrillation thresholds (14.7 +/- 6.4 J vs 11.5 +/- 6 J, P = 0.11) compared with patients with left sided implants. Patients with right-sided implants had a longer implantation time compared with patients with left-sided implants (118 +/- 70 minutes vs 91 +/- 46 minutes, P = 0.074). In follow-up, 5 patients with right-sided implantation received successful therapy for either ventricular fibrillation, (8 episodes) or ventricular tachycardia (5 episodes). No ineffective therapy from the device was delivered in any patients with right-sided implantation. Right-sided pectoral implants are feasible with the Medtronic Jewel active can ICD.

Adult

Sphygmomanometrically determined pulse pressure is a powerful independent predictor of recurrent events after myocardial infarction in patients with impaired left ventricular function. SAVE investigators. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence of a link between conduit vessel stiffness and cardiovascular events, although the association has never been tested in a large post-myocardial infarction patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the relationship between baseline pulse pressure, measured by sphygmomanometry 3 to 16 days after myocardial infarction, and subsequent adverse clinical events in the 2231 patients enrolled in the SAVE Trial. Increased pulse pressure was associated with increased age, left ventricular ejection fraction, female sex, history of prior infarction, diabetes, and hypertension and use of digoxin and calcium channel blockers. Over a 42-month period, there were 503 deaths, 422 cardiovascular deaths, and 303 myocardial infarctions. Pulse pressure was significantly related to each of these end points as a univariate predictor. In a multivariate analysis, pulse pressure remained a significant predictor of total mortality (relative risk, 1.08 per 10 mm Hg increment in pulse pressure; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.17; P<.05) and recurrent myocardial infarction (relative risk, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.23; P<.05) after control for age; left ventricular ejection fraction; mean arterial pressure; sex; treatment arm (captopril or placebo); smoking history; history of prior myocardial infarction, diabetes, or hypertension; and treatment with beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, aspirin, or thrombolytic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide strong evidence for a link between pulse pressure, which is related to conduit vessel stiffness, and subsequent cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Adult

Clinical significance of mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Mitral regurgitation (MR) may complicate acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, it is not known whether mild MR is an independent predictor of post-MI outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 727 Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Study patients who underwent cardiac catheterization, including left ventriculography, up to 16 days after MI. Left ventriculograms were analyzed for diastolic and systolic volumes, global left ventricular sphericity, extent of wall motion abnormality, and endocardial curvature. The presence of MR was related to the risk of developing a cardiovascular event during 3.5 years of follow-up. MR was present in 141 patients (19.4%). Severe (3+) MR was present in only 2 patients. Patients with MR were more likely to have a persistently occluded infarct artery (MR versus no MR, 27.3% versus 15.2%; P=.001). Although the ejection fractions were similar, MR patients had larger end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes and more spherical ventricles than patients without MR. Sphericity change from diastole to systole was also significantly reduced in MR patients. Patients with MR were more likely to experience cardiovascular mortality (29% versus 12%; P<.001), severe heart failure (24% versus 16%; P=.0153), and the combined end point of cardiovascular mortality, severe heart failure, or recurrent myocardial infarction (47% versus 29%; P<.001). The presence of MR was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality (relative risk, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.04). CONCLUSIONS: Mild MR is an independent predictor of post-MI mortality. As such, it adds important information for risk stratification of post-MI patients.

Aged

Ventricular dysfunction and the risk of stroke after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: In patients who have had a myocardial infarction, the long-term risk of stroke and its relation to the extent of left ventricular dysfunction have not been determined. We studied whether a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction is associated with an increased risk of stroke after myocardial infarction and whether other factors such as older age and therapy with anticoagulants, thrombolytic agents, or captopril affect long-term rates of stroke. METHODS: We performed an observational analysis of prospectively collected data on 2231 patients who had left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction who were enrolled in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. The mean follow-up was 42 months. Risk factors for stroke were assessed by both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis. RESULTS: Among these patients, 103 (4.6 percent) had fatal or nonfatal strokes during the study (rate of stroke per year of follow-up, 1.5 percent). The estimated five-year rate of stroke in all the patients was 8.1 percent. As compared with patients without stroke, patients with stroke were older (mean [+/-SD] age, 63+/-9 years vs. 59+/-11 years; P<0.001) and had lower ejection fractions (29+/-7 percent vs. 31+/-7 percent, P=0.01). Independent risk factors for stroke included a lower ejection fraction (for every decrease of 5 percentage points in the ejection fraction there was an 18 percent increase in the risk of stroke), older age, and the absence of aspirin or anticoagulant therapy. Patients with ejection fractions of < or = 28 percent after myocardial infarction had a relative risk of stroke of 1.86, as compared with patients with ejection fractions of more than 35 percent (P=0.01). The use of thrombolytic agents and captopril had no significant effect on the risk of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: During the five years after myocardial infarction, patients have a substantial risk of stroke. A decreased ejection fraction and older age are both independent predictors of an increased risk of stroke. Anticoagulant therapy appears to have a protective effect against stroke after myocardial infarction.

Adult

Electrophysiologic differences in young patients with atrial fibrillation. Influence of preexcitation.

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia, which may occur in young patients without known structural heart disease, with or without preexcitation. Elimination of an accessory pathway in these patients may prevent not only orthodromic and antidromic tachycardia but also atrial fibrillation. However, abnormalities of atrial conduction and refractoriness have been reported, suggesting that atrial fibrillation may still recur in these patients. In a review of all electrophysiologic studies performed at the authors' institution since January 1990 in patients under age 60 years of age without identifiable heart disease, 24 patients with atrial fibrillation were identified whose electrophysiologic measurements of a right atrial conduction and effective refractory period of the right atrium and accessory pathway were in sinus rhythm. Of these patients, 12 had preexcitation and the other 12 did not. These patients were compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects, 12 with preexcitation without atrial fibrillation and 13 without preexcitation or atrial fibrillation, respectively. Electrophysiologic abnormalities were noted in patients with atrial fibrillation depending on the presence or absence of preexcitation. In patients with preexcitation, these abnormalities were a shorter refractory period of the right atrium (212 +/- 33 ms) and of the accessory pathway (251 +/- 27 ms), compared with control subjects (241 +/- 27 ms, P < .05 and 306 +/- 61 ms, P < .02, respectively). In patients without preexcitation, conduction abnormality in the form of prolonged atrial conduction time when compared with control subjects (48 +/- 26 ms vs 31 +/- 10 ms, P < .05) was noted. These findings may influence the type of antiarrhythmic drug used in these patients, and if confirmed in a larger study, they may lead to a better understanding of factors influencing the development of atrial fibrillation in young patients.

Adult

Effect of infarct artery patency on prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. The Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), early restoration of patency of the infarct-related artery (IRA) leads to preservation of left ventricular function and improved clinical outcome. However, there is evidence that the benefits associated with a patent IRA are out of proportion to the observed improvement in ventricular function and may result not only from salvage of ischemic myocardium but also from the opening of the IRA beyond a narrow postinfarct time window. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the effect of IRA patency on outcome of patients after acute MI with left ventricular dysfunction while controlling for differences in left ventricular ejection fraction and the extent of coronary disease and (2) to determine the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy on patients with patent as well as occluded infarct arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study consisted of 2231 patients with a documented MI and a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%. They were randomized to the ACE inhibitor captopril (50 mg TID) or placebo 3 to 16 days after MI and were followed for an average of 3.5 years. Left ventricular ejection fraction, measured with radionuclide left ventriculography, was repeated at the end of the follow-up period. The 946 patients in whom the patency of the IRA was established before randomization form the basis of this study. At cardiac catheterization averaging 4.2 days after infarction, 30.7% of patients had an initially occluded IRA. After revascularization, 162 of the 946 patients (17.1%) were left with an occluded IRA at the time of randomization. The 162 patients with persistently occluded IRAs and 784 with patent IRAs had similar clinical baseline characteristics, but those with occluded arteries had a slightly lower ejection fraction than the 784 patients with patent infarct arteries (30% versus 32%, P = .01). Cox proportional-hazards analyses showed that the independent predictors of all-cause mortality were hypertension (relative risk [RR] 1.94, P < .001), number of diseased coronary arteries (RR 1.68, P < .001), occluded IRA (RR 1.49, P = .039), ejection fraction (RR 1.36, P < .001), age (RR 1.10, P = .030), and use of beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agents (RR 0.60, P = .007). Independent predictors of a composite end point consisting of cardiovascular mortality, morbidity, or reduction of ejection fraction of > or = 9 units were occluded IRA (odds ratio [OR] 1.73, P = .002), hypertension (OR 1.71, P < .001), number of diseased vessels (OR 1.38, P < .001), ejection fraction (OR 1.18, P = .003), use of beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agents (OR 0.67, P = .007), and randomization to captopril (OR 0.70, P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: IRA patency within 16 days after MI predicts a favorable clinical outcome, independent of the number of obstructed coronary arteries or of left ventricular function. The beneficial effect of ACE inhibition is independent of patency status of the IRA. These findings support the need for additional, prospective clinical trials of late reperfusion in MI patients.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists

Clinical and echocardiographic features of intermittent atrial fibrillation that predict recurrent atrial fibrillation. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF) Investigators.

In addition to antithrombotic therapy, 2 treatment strategies for intermittent atrial fibrillation (AF) are evolving: suppression of AF or control of the ventricular response during AF. Clinical and echocardiographic features that predict recurrent AF may influence the choice of management. In this study, clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic data from 486 patients with intermittent AF enrolled in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation studies were analyzed. Patients with intermittent AF were younger (p < 0.001), had fewer incidences of systemic hypertension (p < 0.007) and heart failure (p < 0.001), and had more recent-onset AF than patients with constant AF. They also had a smaller mean left atrial diameter, a lower prevalence of a large (> 5 cm) left atrium, better left ventricular performance by echo, and less mitral regurgitation. After a mean follow-up of 26 months, 51% of patients remained in sinus rhythm and 49% of patients developed recurrent AF, including 12% who had AF, as seen on all follow-up electrocardiograms. Clinical factors predicting recurrent AF were age, heart failure, and myocardial infarction. An enlarged left atrium was associated with recurrent intermittent AF; an enlarged left ventricle predicted conversion to constant AF. Thus, clinical and echocardiographic parameters predict recurrent AF in patients with intermittent nonvalvular AF.

Age Factors

Angiographic predictors of reocclusion after thrombolysis: results from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 4 trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study attempted to determine which lesion characteristics are associated with reocclusion by 18 to 36 h. BACKGROUND: Reocclusion of the infarct-related artery after successful reperfusion is associated with significant morbidity and up to a threefold increase in mortality. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-eight patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive either anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) or recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or their combination. Culprit arteries were assessed for Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, lesion ulceration, thrombus, collateral circulation and eccentricity. Minimal lumen diameter, percent diameter stenosis and lesion irregularity (power) were calculated using quantitative angiography. RESULTS: Reocclusion was observed more frequently in arteries with TIMI 2 versus TIMI 3 flow (10.4% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.003), in ulcerated lesions (10.7% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.009) and in the presence of collateral vessels (18.2% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.03). Similar trends were observed for eccentric (7.3% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.06) and thrombotic (8.4% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.06) lesions. Reocclusion was associated with more severe mean percent stenosis (77.9% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.04). Lesion length, reference segment diameter and Fourier measures of lesion irregularity were not associated with reocclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Several simply assessed angiographic variables, such as the presence of TIMI grade 2 flow, ulceration, collateral vessels and greater percent diameter stenosis at 90 min after thrombolytic therapy, are associated with significantly higher rates of infarct-related artery reocclusion by 18 to 36 h and may aid in identifying the subset of patients who are at significantly higher risk of early reocclusion and who potentially warrant further early pharmacologic or mechanical intervention.

Adult

Use of a standardized heparin nomogram to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation after thrombolytic therapy in myocardial infarction. TIMI 4 investigators. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: The recently completed Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 4 Study compared three thrombolytic treatment regimens for acute myocardial infarction. The treatment arms included front-loaded recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA), anistreplase (APSAC), or both, in conjunction with an intravenous bolus of 5000 U of heparin, followed by 1000 U/h. To facilitate anticoagulation, a heparin nomogram was developed to maintain the therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time at 1 1/2 to 2 times the control value. METHODS: A poll revealed that nine centers made use of the recommended heparin nomogram and six did not, adjusting the heparin dosage according to local practice. Anticoagulation parameters, major hemorrhagic events, and the frequency of heparin interruption were compared between centers that used and did not use the nomogram. RESULTS: Subtherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time values were noted in 4%, 14%, 29%, 46%, 37%, and 34% of patients 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours, respectively, after heparin treatment was begun. Patients with subtherapeutic values at 24 hours were younger (mean +/- SD, 55.2 +/- 10.6 vs 59.6 +/- 10.6 years, P = .02) and weighed more (86.4 +/- 13.5 vs 78.9 +/- 15.7 kg, P = .007) than patients with therapeutic values. Centers that used the nomogram had significantly fewer subtherapeutic values at 48 and 96 hours. In addition, heparin therapy was interrupted less frequently at centers that used the nomogram (38.1% vs 68.7%, P < .001). Major spontaneous hemorrhage, reinfarction, and reocclusion rates were low and were about the same in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a heparin nomogram provided improved anticoagulation in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction. Weight- and age-adjusted heparin dosing may provide further improvement in anticoagulation with heparin therapy. Our findings support the need for frequent monitoring of the activated partial thromboplastin time and for a standardized approach to adjusting the heparin dosage.

Aged

Causes of higher in-hospital mortality in women than in men after acute myocardial infarction.

Clinical, laboratory and cardiac catheterization parameters were reviewed in 355 men and 155 women hospitalized at a tertiary care referral center between February 1987 and December 1991 to analyze why women have a higher in-hospital mortality rate than do men after acute myocardial infarction. Hospital mortality was 21.4% in women and 12.1% in men (p = 0.007). In comparison with men, women were older (63.3 +/- 11.9 vs 60.5 +/- 12.6 years; p = 0.023), had more systemic hypertension (46.5 vs 34.4%; p = 0.001) and higher serum total cholesterol levels (211 +/- 51 vs 197 +/- 49 mg/dl; p = 0.0015), sought medical care later (8.9 vs 5.3 hours; p = 0.026), were referred later (47.7 vs 43.7 hours; p = 0.063) and had more shock (34.8 vs 24.2%; p = 0.013). Logistic regression analysis revealed 5 variables predictive of hospital mortality; age > 65 years, diabetes, shock, non-Q-wave infarction, and not undergoing cardiac catheterization. Gender was of borderline significance in predicting hospital mortality. Cardiac catheterization, performed in 88% of women and 87% of men, showed similar rates of 1-, 2- and 3-vessel disease, and similar characteristics of the infarction-related artery. The differences in hospital mortality between men and women are due to a combination of pre- and in-hospitalization factors in women. The excess mortality is not due to differences in disease severity as evaluated by cardiac catheterization information.

Age Factors

Effects of captopril on ischemic events after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. SAVE Investigators.

BACKGROUND: In the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) was the most important predictor of a poor outcome and conferred a sevenfold increase in risk of death. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of recurrent MI in study participants and to examine the influence of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril on this and other myocardial ischemic events. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 2231 patients had survived the acute phase of MI (3 to 16 days) and had a radionuclide ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%. Patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment with either placebo or captopril and were followed for an average of 42 months. The influence of captopril on recurrent MI, cardiac revascularization procedures, and hospitalization with unstable angina was examined. The likelihood of recurrent MI was greater in patients with an MI or functional disability before the index infarction and higher systolic pressure (all P < .001) but was not influenced by baseline left ventricular ejection fraction. Therapy with captopril reduced the risk of development of recurrent MI by 25% (95% confidence intervals, 5% to 40%; P = .015) and the risk of death after recurrent MI by 32% (95% confidence intervals, 4% to 51%; P = .029). Captopril-assigned patients were also less likely to require cardiac revascularization procedures (P = .010), but hospitalization for unstable angina was unaltered. When all three of these major coronary ischemic events were considered together, captopril therapy reduced the risk (14% risk reduction; 95% confidence intervals, 0% to 26%; P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: In post-MI patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, long-term administration of captopril reduced recurrence of MI and the need for cardiac revascularization but had no influence on the rate of hospitalization with a discharge diagnosis of unstable angina. The finding that the recurrence of MI was independent of left ventricular ejection fraction suggests that captopril could be useful in preventing recurrent MI in patients with more preserved left ventricular function. The need for cardiac revascularization was reduced in patients receiving long-term captopril therapy, suggesting either an anti-ischemic effect or the ability of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to modify the atherosclerotic process in survivors of MI.

Angina, Unstable

Prevention of myocardial reinfarction. Recommendations based on results of drug trials.

Therapy after acute myocardial infarction offers the prospect of increased survival in carefully selected patients. Current recommendations favor the use of beta blockers and antiplatelet agents, but some positive effects have been seen with use of anticoagulants, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers. Further studies are needed to evaluate these drug classes in reinfarction prophylaxis and to define differences among the agents in each class.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists

Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction after myocardial infarction are major predictors of death. In experimental and clinical studies, longterm therapy with the angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitor captopril attenuated ventricular dilatation and remodeling. We investigated whether captopril could reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after a myocardial infarction. METHODS: Within 3 to 16 days after myocardial infarction, 2231 patients with ejection fractions of 40 percent or less but without overt heart failure or symptoms of myocardial ischemia were randomly assigned to receive doubleblind treatment with either placebo (1116 patients) or captopril (1115 patients) and were followed for an average of 42 months. RESULTS: Mortality from all causes was significantly reduced in the captopril group (228 deaths, or 20 percent) as compared with the placebo group (275 deaths, or 25 percent); the reduction in risk was 19 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 3 to 32 percent; P = 0.019). In addition, the incidence of both fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events was consistently reduced in the captopril group. The reduction in risk was 21 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 35 percent; P = 0.014) for death from cardiovascular causes, 37 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 20 to 50 percent; P less than 0.001) for the development of severe heart failure, 22 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 4 to 37 percent; P = 0.019) for congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization, and 25 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 40 percent; P = 0.015) for recurrent myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction, long-term administration of captopril was associated with an improvement in survival and reduced morbidity and mortality due to major cardiovascular events. These benefits were observed in patients who received thrombolytic therapy, aspirin, or beta-blockers, as well as those who did not, suggesting that treatment with captopril leads to additional improvement in outcome among selected survivors of myocardial infarction.

Adult

Time to first pulse after automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation.

Should automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) power sources be explanted and discontinued if they have not pulsed during the first generator life? We have followed 59 patients an average of 23 months (range, 3 days to 8.4 years) after AICD implantation. The indication for AICD implantation was based on clinical dysrhythmia, history of sudden death, and findings at electrophysiologic study. Thirty-eight of 59 patients (64%) had experienced sudden death and 52/58 (90%) were inducible at electrophysiologic study. Excluding 5 inappropriate pulsing episodes, 31 of 59 patients (53%) had 235 pulses (range, 1 to 36; median, 2 pulses). The time to first pulse after implantation ranged from 1 day to 3.5 years with a median time of 2 months. In 6 patients, the first pulsing occurred later than 1 year after AICD implantation. Fifteen generators demonstrating impending power source failure have been replaced in 11 patients. Power source depletion occurred at an average of 24.1 months (range, 8 to 40 months). In 3 patients, the first pulsing occurred after generator depletion and replacement. By univariate analysis, none of 13 variables (sex, age, cardiac disease process, functional class, previous myocardial infarction, sudden death history, ejection fraction, type of dysrhythmia, inducibility with electrophysiologic testing, number of extra stimuli required for induction, left ventricular aneurysm resection, endocardial resection, or concomitant operation) was found to be a predictor of pulsing (p greater than 0.05). We conclude that the majority of patients with pulses after AICD implantation will have them during the first 6 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent