Reducing likelihood of instrumental delivery with epidural anaesthesia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Capogna.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Fetal heart rate (FHR) changes occasionally follow the use of labor epidurals. Most studies of the phenomenon have focused on specific techniques, but similar timing and appearance suggest a common cause. Induction of analgesia may transiently alter the balance between factors encouraging and inhibiting uterine contractions with subsequent changes of FHR patterns. Regardless the etiology, these changes are transient and do not produce maternal or fetal morbidity. However, they must be promptly recognized and treated if necessary.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, double-blind, sequential allocation study was to compare the effects of spontaneous and prostaglandin-induced labor on the minimum analgesic dose of epidural sufentanil in the first stage of labor. METHODS: Seventy healthy, nulliparous women, at more than 37 weeks' gestation with cervical dilatation from 2 to 4 cm, requesting epidural pain relief in labor were enrolled. The subjects were assigned to two different groups according to whether labor was spontaneous or induced with dinoprostone 0.5 mg. Parturients received 10 ml of the study solution through a lumbar epidural catheter. The initial dose was sufentanil 25 microg, and subsequent doses were determined by the response of the previous patient in the same group using up-down sequential allocation. The analgesic effectiveness was assessed using 100-mm visual analog pain scores. The up-down sequences were analyzed using the method of independent paired reversals and probit regression. RESULTS: The minimum analgesic dose of sufentanil in spontaneous labor was 22.2 microg (95% CI: 19.6, 22.8) and 27.3 microg (95% CI: 23.8, 30.9) in induced labor. The minimum analgesic dose of sufentanil in induced labor was significantly greater (P = 0.0014) than that in spontaneous labor (95% CI difference: 2.9, 9.3) by a factor of 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.5). CONCLUSION: Prostaglandin induction of labor produces a significantly greater analgesic requirement than does spontaneous labor.
We have used the technique of randomized, double-blind sequential allocation to compare the minimum local analgesic concentrations (MLAC) of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine for women in the first stage of labour. The test bolus was 20 ml of local anaesthetic solution. The concentration was determined by the response of the previous woman to a higher or lower concentration of local anaesthetic, according to up-down sequential allocation. Efficacy was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue pain score (VAPS). The test solution had to achieve a VAPS of 10 mm or less to be judged effective. For bupivacaine, MLAC was 0.093 (95% CI 0.076-0.110)% w/v, and for ropivacaine, 0.156 (95% CI 0.136-0.176)%w/v (P < 0.0001, 95% CI difference 0.036-0.090). The analgesic potency of ropivacaine was 0.60 (0.47-0.75) relative to bupivacaine. Claims for reduced toxicity and motor block must be considered with differences in analgesic potency in mind.
We have used the technique of double-blind sequential allocation to quantify the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) of extradural bupivacaine for women in early (median cervical dilatation 2 cm) and late (median cervical dilatation 5 cm) labour. The first bolus was 20 ml of the bupivacaine test solution. The concentration was determined by the response of the previous woman to a higher or lower concentration of bupivacaine according to up and down sequential allocation. Efficacy was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue pain score (VAPS). The test solution had to achieve a VAPS of 10 mm or less to be judged effective. In early labour, the MLAC of bupivacaine was 0.048% w/v (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.037-0.058% w/v), and 0.140% w/v (95% CI 0.132-0.150% w/v) in the late group. The MLAC of bupivacaine in late labour was greater by a factor of 2.9 (95% CI 2.7-3.2) compared with the MLAC in early labour (P < 0.0001, 95% CI difference 0.08-0.11). We conclude that advancing labour requires an increased concentration of extradural bupivacaine for pain relief.
This double-blind randomized study of 116 healthy women was undertaken to evaluate whether alkalinization potentiated the analgesic effects of epidural fentanyl-lidocaine for elective Caesarean section. After a test-dose of 3 ml, lidocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:200,000, all patients received 100 micrograms, fentanyl in 5 ml saline and they were then divided into two groups, to receive incremental doses of 5 ml lidocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:200,000 with or without 0.1 mEq.ml-1 sodium bicarbonate, to obtain anaesthesia to T4. The addition of bicarbonate to lidocaine resulted in a mean (SD) pH increase from 6.58 (0.01) to 7.14 (0.02) and in a mean PCO2 increase from 3.8 (0.8) to 345.1 (5.9) mmHg. Onset of sensory analgesia to the S1 segment as well as the interval between the block and the delivery of the baby were shorter in the bicarbonate group (respectively 15.4 (6.9) vs 18.9 (4.8) min and 28.9 (9.5) versus 33.9 (11.8) min; P < 0.01 and 0.05). No differences were noted in the onset to T4 or in the degree of motor block. The percentage of patients experiencing pain during surgery and requiring intravenous analgesics was higher in the group which did not receive bicarbonate (3% vs 16%; P < 0.05). There were no differences in intraoperative maternal side-effects, neonatal outcome or in maternal venous and umbilical venous and arterial lidocaine concentrations between the groups. The concentrations of fentanyl in maternal plasma, umbilical artery, and the umbilical artery to maternal vein ratio were greater in the alkalinized group (P < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
We have studied the efficacy of i.v. clonidine to suppress post-extradural shivering in parturients. Forty healthy parturients who received extradural block for labour (n = 20) or for Caesarean section (n = 20) and who required treatment for shivering after delivery were allocated randomly to two groups. Group I received i.v. clonidine 30 micrograms diluted in saline to a total volume of 5 ml (therapeutic solution). This bolus was repeated every 5 min if the initial therapy produced no improvement, up to a maximum dose of 90 micrograms. Group II received saline 5 ml (placebo solution), repeated every 5 min if the initial bolus produced no improvement, up to a maximum of three boluses. After 15 min of observation, patients in group I received the placebo solution and those in group II received the study solution. All patients who received clonidine improved, and 75% ceased to shiver within 5 min after only one dose of clonidine 30 micrograms. In contrast, none of the patients treated with saline improved. When patients in the placebo group received clonidine, improvement occurred. Arterial pressure, heart rate, core and peripheral temperature and oxygen saturation did not differ significantly between and within the groups before and after administration of clonidine. We conclude that a small dose of i.v. clonidine may be useful to suppress post-extradural shivering in parturients.
Twenty-eight elderly patients scheduled for urological surgery were randomly assigned to receive, in a double-blind study, subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg with 50 micrograms (group A, n = 7), 25 micrograms (group B, n = 7), or 12.5 micrograms (group C, n = 7) of fentanyl or 1 ml of saline (group D, n = 7) in a total volume of 4 ml. The pattern of breathing and the ventilatory response to CO2 were studied before and 90, 150 and 480 min after the subarachnoid injection. In group A, mild pruritus and sedation occurred in five patients, while nausea, vomiting and periodic breathing occurred in two. In group B, mild pruritus and sedation were observed in four patients, while nausea and vomiting occurred in two. No significant differences in minute ventilation, respiratory drive and respiratory timing were observed between the groups. Patients receiving fentanyl 50 micrograms showed a percentual change from baseline values as function of time (slope VE/PE'CO2) significantly below baseline at 90 and 150 min (p less than 0.05). However, the baseline values in this group reverted after 480 min. No side effects were observed in groups C or D. It is concluded that subarachnoid fentanyl 50 micrograms can cause an early respiratory depression and its use as a postoperative analgesic should be avoided in the elderly.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Twenty eight elderly patients scheduled for urologic surgery were randomly assigned to receive in a double blind fashion subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg with the addition of 50 micrograms (group A, n = 7), 25 micrograms (group B, n = 7), 12.5 micrograms (group C, n = 7), of fentanyl or 1 ml of saline (group D, n = 7) for a total volume of 4 ml. The pattern of breathing and the ventilatory response to CO2 were studied before 90, 150, 480 minutes after the subarachnoid injection. In group A mild pruritus and sedation occurred in 5 patients, nausea, vomiting and periodic breathing occurred in 2 patients. In group B mild pruritus and sedation were observed in 4 patients, nausea, vomiting in 2 patients. No significant changes in VE, Vt/Ti and Ti/Ttot were observed between the groups. Patients receiving 50 micrograms of fentanyl showed a slope VE/PET CO2 significantly below baseline values at 90 and 150 minutes (p less than 0.05). In this group the baseline values were restored after 480 minutes. No side effects were observed in group C and D. 25 micrograms fo fentanyl is the only dose with a significant analgesic effect without any respiratory depression.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Forty mothers undergoing elective Caesarean section under general anaesthesia were allocated randomly to receive either propofol 2.8 mg kg-1 (n = 20) or thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 (n = 20) for induction of anaesthesia. Twenty neonates delivered by uncomplicated vaginal delivery were evaluated also as unmedicated controls. Neurobehavioural examinations were carried out at 1, 4 and 24 h after delivery. Infants in the propofol group had lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min; 25% of them had muscular hypotonus at 5 min. This hypotonus was not noted during the Early Neonatal Neurobehavioural Scale (ENNS) examination. Newborn children examined 1 h after birth, after maternal anaesthesia with propofol, showed a depression in alert state, pinprick and placing reflexes, and mean decremental count in Moro and light. There was a generalized irritability in 25% of them. This depression was not observed at 4 h.
Two doses of intrathecal buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia have been compared. Forty-five women undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (controls, n = 15) received hyperbaric bupivacaine; Groups B and C received the same but with the addition of 0.03 mg or 0.045 mg buprenorphine, respectively. Patients receiving buprenorphine had a longer pain-free interval than the controls (P less than 0.01). Within the buprenorphine groups, patients receiving the higher dose had a longer effect (420 min s.d. 24) than those receiving the lower dose (173 min s.d. 31) (P less than 0.01) without any increase in side-effects.
Ninety-five healthy nulliparous women, ASA physical status I-II with an uncomplicated pregnancy and single fetus in vertex position were given lumbar epidural analgesia. Patients in Group A (n = 35) received bupivacaine 0.125 per cent with epinephrine 1:800.000; Groups B (n = 30) and C (n = 30) received the same agents as Group A but with the addition to the initial dose of 50 or 100 micrograms of fentanyl respectively. All patients were evaluated for duration and quality of analgesia, duration of labour, method of delivery and total dose of bupivacaine used. The addition of either 50 or 100 micrograms of fentanyl resulted in longer duration of analgesia (93 +/- 9 min and 106 +/- 8 min respectively vs 55 +/- 7) and reduced bupivacaine total doses (64 +/- 0.03 and 55 +/- 1.5 respectively vs 109.5 +/- 1.3). Only the addition of 100 micrograms of fentanyl improved significantly the quality of analgesia (43.3 per cent of excellent scores vs 6.6 per cent in Group B and 5.7 per cent in Group A). Addition of fentanyl did not affect the duration of labour, the method of delivery and the neonatal neurobehaviour scores.
Ninety patients aged 56-85 years scheduled for suprapubic prostatectomy, randomly received intrathecally either bupivacaine 30 mg (group A, n = 30), bupivacaine 30 mg plus buprenorphine 0.03 mg (group B, n = 30) or bupivacaine 30 mg plus buprenorphine 0.045 mg (group C, n = 30). Prolonged postoperative analgesia, minimal disturbance of consciousness and comfortable breathing were common to the groups that received buprenorphine. The higher concentration of buprenorphine improved the quality and duration of analgesia. The only side effects found in the buprenorphine groups were nausea and vomiting in 11 and 14 patients, respectively, in groups B and C. Our study shows that buprenorphine is an effective analgesic, suitable for the management of postoperative pain in elderly patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.