PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Catto

Publications and source records attributed to G Catto.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Improving professional competence--the way ahead?

Globally, there has been considerable interest from the public, medical profession, and governments in ensuring that doctors are fit for practice. Appropriate accountability for the profession has become an important contemporary issue. With doubts emerging on the effectiveness of professionally led regulation, a variety of different mechanisms have been devised to ensure that patients receive appropriate and good quality care. This paper reviews regulation of the medical profession and indicates the way in which doctors in the UK are held accountable for their practice.

Clinical Competence↗

Evaluation of clinical guidelines for the management of end-stage renal disease in europe: the EU BIOMED 1 study.

BACKGROUND: There are wide national and international variations in the management of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The aim of this study was to develop, harmonize, implement, and evaluate consensus-based clinical guidelines for the management of renal anaemia and renal bone disease in patients with ESRD, and for the prevention and management of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients across six renal centres in Europe. METHODS: The trial was a prospective, multicentre, randomized balanced incomplete block design. Nephrologists from the six European renal units were randomized to develop and implement guidelines for two out of the three conditions and to act as a control for the third condition. Data were collected pre- (1 year) and post- (9 months) intervention on aspects of patient monitoring, management, and outcome. RESULTS: Eight hundred and twenty-nine dialysis patients from the six European dialysis centres were included in the study. Multivariate analysis (adjusting for case-mix and secular trends) showed a significant increase in the number of monitoring events in the guideline group compared with control group (6%, 95% CI, 1-11%). There was no concomitant increase in either appropriate management or the number of favourable patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In the first European collaboration on renal guidelines, the introduction of the guidelines improved the monitoring of the patients, but did not improve patient management or outcome. This study suggests the potential for creating clinical guidelines with the aim of standardizing treatment protocols across international boundaries, and improving the quality of the medical care provided.

Adolescent↗