Adequacy in hemodialysis: new concepts derived from online urea monitoring.
BACKGROUND: The estimation of urea kinetic parameters [urea generation rate (Gu), normalized protein catabolic rate (NPCR), and dialysis dose (Kt/V)] is routinely performed during a single hemodialysis session as a representative sample of a stable series. To ascertain whether the stability assumption is tenable and to estimate the variability of urea kinetic parameters, a number of stable patients on regular dialysis treatment in their usual clinical setting were followed. METHODS: Thirteen stable patients on regular hemodialysis aged 61 +/- 11 were monitored from 5 to 24 weeks (median, 10 weeks) with the urea biosensor system in double-chamber hemodiafiltration. Body weight did not change appreciably. Residual renal function was negligible or absent. Weekly averaged urea concentration (TACw), Gu, NPCR, and Kt/Veq were calculated, and their serial patterns and interrelationships were evaluated through graphical analysis and linear regression. RESULTS: In six patients, the urea pool was substantially unchanged, but variability of Gu and Kt/V was comparable to that of the other groups. In three patients, body urea pool increased. Gu went from 4. 78 +/- 0.44 to 5.40 +/- 0.65 mg/min, and Kt/V went from 1.25 +/- 0. 25 to 1.34 +/- 0.31. In four patients, body urea pool decreased; Gu went from to 6.55 +/- 1.91 to 5.85 +/- 2.26 mg/min, and Kt/V did not change appreciably. Parameters might change in a nearly linear trend or occasionally as abrupt or oscillating phases. Gu was the main factor involved, and the only one affecting four of the seven unstable patients. Kt/V was never solely involved. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the estimation of urea kinetic parameters is often affected by a non-negligible degree of variability, which can be ascribed to the variability of the dialytic dose delivered and, above all, to the daily changes of diet protein assumption.