PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Contesso

Publications and source records attributed to G Contesso.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

[Intramammary spread of breast cancer].

At the conclusion of this study based on a careful histological analysis of 454 mastectomy specimens carried out at the Institut Gustave-Roussy between 1966 and 1971 it appears that 39 per cent of tumours which are neither central nor deep to the nipple have microscopic foci outside the main focus of tumour of which 24 per cent are at the level of the single nipple. The importance of these extensions is bound up with the size and histological type of the adenocarcinoma: pure intraduct and infiltrating lobular forms are accompanied frequently by microscopic intramammary foci at a distance (89% and 72%) the opposite of findings in the case of well differentiated and medullary forms. On the other hand no connection between the Scarff and Bloom grading is apparent except where the nipple only is involved. Finally there is a strong relationship between intramammary dissemination and regional lymph node metastases.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[Estrogen and progesterone receptors in non carcinomatous breast diseases (author's transl)].

Cytosolic receptors for estrogens and progesterone are studied using an exchange method in various types of benign breast diseases: fibroadenomas, fibrocystic mastosis, phylloid tumors and gynecomastias. The results show clearly that, contrary to breast carcinomas, receptors are generally not present in benign tumors. These results are statistically significant for all the women studied. Studying the pathological aspects of the tumors, it can be noted that the presence of receptors, is correlated with proliferation forms with large epithelial components. Furthermore, these results show that receptors are not found in gynecomastia. In conclusion, the physician should follow up very carefully the patients with a benign tumor, when hormono-receptors are present.

Adolescent↗

[Clinical prognostic factors in breast cancer].

Five year survival of 683 mammary carcinomas would confirm the prognostic value of T.N.M. classification (UICC), of tumor particular characteristics (size, fixation to neighbouring structures) and presence or absence of clinical nodes. A clinical-histological relationship was studied for axillary nodes: in our experience, clinical determination is more reliable for estimation of N0 and N2 than N1. Three groups of age were considered; the age, T and N corrected five year survival show a higher mortality for patients older than 60 years with T3-T4, N greater than 0 carcinomas. The study of this prospective computerised register confirms the prognostic value of developping growth tumors (PEV) described by P. Denoix. In fact, inflammatory carcinomas (PEV 2-PEV 3) show a poor 5 year survival and PEV 1 is an intermediate pronostic group between stable and inflammatory carcinomas. PEV 1 was showed to be an independant clinical factor from T and N characteristics.

Adult↗

[The anatomopathological factors of prognostic value in breast cancer].

A prospective study on the progress of 356 women with unilateral carcinoma of the breast treated throughout at the Institut Gustave-Roussy, by a Halsted or Patey type radical mastectomy. Between 1-1-68 and 31-12-71 293 patients without any previous treatment were operated on, and 63 after irradiation according to the dosage-schedule then in force. In the first group no prognostic importance could be attached to the character of the tumour margin nor to its stroma. Two features thought to be bound up with survival on first analysis were not found to have significance when the other prognostic factors were kept constant and these are microscopic spread of tumour outside the nipple and transcapsular spread of tumour in the axillary nodes. Only four parameters were found to have a real prognostic value and these were the size of the tumour, its Bloom grading, microscopic spread to the nipple and the number of nodes invaded, with a threshold at three involved nodes. With regard to irradiated carcinomas, whose number were really too small for such an intense analysis, only two parameters were related to survival: Bloom grading and the number of axillary nodes invaded.

Axilla↗

[Radical mastectomy and modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer. Indications and results].

We studied first the long term results in a series of 1 139 immediately operable breast cancers, treated by a protocol which gave an important role to extended radical mastectomy (radical mastectomy with internal mammary node dissection). No difference in survival was noted according to the surgical procedure used, and the extended mastectomy does not seem to have demonstrated its superiority. Its value could be judged in a more rigorous manner thanks to the results of an international therapeutic trial, comparing radical mastectomy with extended radical mastectomy. Results were improved by the extended procedure in only one sub-group of patients, whose tumours was located in central or inner quadrants, T1 or T2, with positive axillary nodes: these patients represents 13 per cent of patients with immediately operable tumors. Taking these results into account a new protocol has been adopted at the Institut Gustave-Roussy: T1 cancers will be the object of a therapeutic trial between conservative treatment and modified radical mastectomy. T2 (internal or central) cancers, with axillary nodal involvement will be treated by extended radical mastectomy. T2 tumors (external) and all T3 tumors will be treated by a modified radical mastectomy.

Breast Neoplasms↗

[Histology of precancerous lesions of the breast].

The authors are dealing with the problem of pre-cancerous lesions from data contained in the pathological archives of the Institut Gustave-Roussy. One series consists of 320 cases operated upon for benign lesions or tumors of the breast (Fibroadenomas appearing at a relatively advanced age) of which 4 developed cancers. The past histories of another series of 730 patients having had mastectomies for cancer are examined; 24 of these had been operated upon previously for benign tumours or lesions of the breast. Attention is drawn to a number of histological signs the presence of which in an "a priori" benign lesion should evoke caution: multilayered epithelium of the galactophores glands with an "en flammèche" appearance, tubular adenomatous hyperplasia, irregular lobular hyperplasia, microcalcifications... Despite careful examination of multiple sections, the pathologists decision between benign and malignant lesion continue to be difficult.

Adenofibroma↗

Does long-term exposure to gel-filled silicone implants increase the risk of relapse after breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of cancer and autoimmune diseases associated with gel-filled silicone implants, debated by FDA experts since 1991, has given rise to a profusion of literature on the subject. However, such effects have not been adequately investigated in patients with breast cancer. In a previous report we compared 146 breast cancer patients with gel-filled silicone implants for breast reconstruction to 146 control patients in whom no reconstruction had been performed. The observed results were reassuring, as the evolution of the disease after 10 years was better in the reconstruction group than in the control group. We now report the end results of this study with a median follow-up of 13 years after the breast reconstruction (range, 10-20 years). METHOD: The relative risks of detrimental events were estimated with Cox's Proportional Hazards Model, with stratification according to age at diagnosis. RESULTS: The risks of locoregional recurrences and distant metastasis were significantly lower in the BR group than in the control group. The risks of death, of a second breast cancer and of a second primary cancer at a site other than the breast were not significantly different between the two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up of patients exposed to gel-filled silicone implants confirms the absence of detrimental effects after breast cancer. The power of our study is, however, below that required to detect a very slight increase in the risks studied.

Adult↗