PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Cruz Caparrós

Publications and source records attributed to G Cruz Caparrós.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

[Characteristics of patients with multiple disease hospitalized in Internal Medicine services].

INTRODUCTION: Know what proportion of patients hospitalized in the Internal Medicine services have multiple diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 400 clinical histories of a random sample of patients admitted to 24 Internal Medicine services of Andalusia. We assessed the diagnostic categories present that make it possible to classify patients as having multiple diseases. RESULTS: One hundred sixty eight patients (42%) were considered as having multiple diseases. The most prevalent diseases in these patients are cardiological and diabetes mellitus. The two main variables that determine that one is a multiple disease patient are age and disease causing the admission. DISCUSSION: A significant percentage of the patients admitted to the Medicine services of the Andalusia public hospitals have multiple diseases.

Aged↗

[Predictive factors for inappropriate hospital stays in an internal medicine department].

BACKGROUND: We aimed to know which factors are associated with inappropriate stays in an internal medicine department. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We included 1,046 hospitalisations and evaluated the justification of the admission using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. RESULTS: 176 (16.8%) stays were considered inappropriate. In a multiple regression model, variables defining an inappropriate stay were the number of days in hospital, diagnosis on admission and the weekly day. CONCLUSION: There are determining factors for inappropriate stays in an internal medicine department.

Age Factors↗

[Factors associated with inappropriate hospitalization at an internal medicine department].

BACKGROUND: To determine the factors associated with inappropriate admissions in an Internal medicine department. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We included 1,993 admissions. The justification for the admissions was evaluated using the Appropriateness Evalutation Protocol. RESULTS: 187 (9.4%) admissions were considered inappropriate. The likelihood of an inappropriate admission was higher as long as the patient was younger than 65 years of age (OR, 1.94; (95%) IC, 1.32-2.85) and the admission had been programmed from the outpatients clinic (OR, 10.58; (95%) IC, 2.79-40.1). Clinical diagnosis also influenced the inappropriateness of admissions. CONCLUSION: Age, diagnosis and source of patients determine inappropriate admissions in an internal medicine department.

Aged↗

[What do the internal medicine residents of Anadalusia think of their specialty? Survey results].

BACKGROUND: To know the opinion of andalusian Internal Medicine (IM) residents about different subjects of their specialty, and their biomedical investigation activities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire with codified answers, facilitated to 64 IM residents of Andalusia. RESULTS: 69% of residents referred that IM was the specialty they wished to adhere at first choice. A 61% of residents would advice choosing IM as specialty to physicians with the exams for becoming a resident just passed. Best merit of IM for 89% of people was the global sight of the patient, and worst one for 37.5% was its tendency to fragmentation. 47% of residents consider that the role of the specialty will grow in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Our questionnaire reflects some of the contradictions that IM as a specialty is living, and probably show the rely of future internists to some future propositions about the specialty.

Adult↗