PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G D Burkholder

Publications and source records attributed to G D Burkholder.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Triplex DNA in the nucleus: direct binding of triplex-specific antibodies and their effect on transcription, replication and cell growth.

Jel 318 and Jel 466 are triplex-specific monoclonal antibodies which previously have been shown to bind to cell nuclei and chromosomes by immunofluorescence. Their interaction was further characterized by two methods. First, isolated intact nuclei were encapsulated in agarose. Both antibodies showed significant binding to the nuclei which could be inhibited by adding competing triplex DNA but not by adding Escherichia coli DNA to which the antibodies do not bind. Both triplex-specific antibodies inhibited replication and transcription in the nuclei by about 20%. Secondly, the antibodies were introduced into synchronized myeloma cells by osmotic shock of pynocytic vesicles. Cell-cycle studies showed that the myeloma cells had an S phase of about 10 h and a doubling time of about 20 h. The cells were synchronized with thymidine and both cell growth and cell death were monitored. Introduction of the triplex-specific antibodies caused a marked decrease in cell growth without a significant increase in cell death. The effectiveness of the antibodies was improved by the addition of chloroquine diphosphate which inhibits degradation in the lysosomes. As a control, introduction of an antibody specific for a bacterial protein had little effect. In synchronized cells, inhibition of proliferation reached a maximum at 7 to 13 h after the release from the thymidine block. Thus, cells are most sensitive to the triplex-binding antibodies at the end of S phase and during G2. This result is consistent with the view that triplexes are involved in chromosome condensation/decondensation.

Animals↗

Characterization of a new monoclonal antibody to triplex DNA and immunofluorescent staining of mammalian chromosomes.

A monoclonal antibody, Jel 466, was prepared from mice immunized with poly[d(Tm5C)].poly[d(GA)]. The binding of Jel 466 to nucleic acids was characterized by solid phase radioimmunoassays and competition experiments. There was no binding to single-stranded DNAs or to duplexes which could not form triplexes. In addition, the antibody preferred the triplex form of poly[d(TC)].poly[d(GA)]; it bound weakly to the triplex derived from poly[d(G)].poly[d(C)], but there was no interaction with poly[d(T)].poly[d(A)].poly[d(T)]. This pattern of specificity is very different from that of Jel 318, a triplex-specific antibody that will bind to poly[d(T)].poly[d(A)].poly[d(T)]. The amino acid sequence of Jel 466 also showed very little homology with Jel 318, although both contain many positively charged amino acids. The immunofluorescent staining of mouse and human chromosomes with Jel 466 was studied. In all cases, there was a marked reciprocal relationship between the pattern of Jel 466 on the one hand and that of Hoechst 33258 and Jel 318 on the other. Jel 466 was negative for C-band and G-band but positive for R-band, whereas the opposite was found for Hoechst and Jel 318. Since C and G-bands are AT-rich and R-bands are GC-rich, these staining patterns match the sequence preferences of the two antibodies. Thus the base composition of triplex-forming DNA differs from domain to domain.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Plasmid dimerization mediated by triplex formation between polypyrimidine-polypurine repeats.

The ability of independent pyr.pur tracts to participate in triplex formation has been investigated in linear plasmids. The pyr.pur tract could be positioned at the ends of the plasmids or internally by a suitable choice of restriction enzyme. Dimer formation between plasmids was monitored by mobility shifts on agarose gels as well as by direct visualization in the electron microscope. Linear dimers and X and Y structures were observed. Control experiments showed that a pyr.pur tract was essential and was consistent with triplex formation in which the two pyrimidine strands were antiparallel. These structures were formed at pHs between 4 and 6, but once formed they remained stable up to pH 7. Spermine was required for formation of dimers at low ionic strength, but once formed the dimers remained stable in the absence of spermine. Additional linear plasmids were constructed with pyr.pur tracts at both ends; these formed structures at pH 4 which had mobilities identical to those of open circles. Triplex formation of this type may serve as a good model for loop formation in eukaryotic chromosomes.

Base Sequence↗

Immunofluorescent localization of triplex DNA in polytene chromosomes of Chironomus and Drosophila.

Purine.pyrimidine (pur.pyr) DNA tracts are prevalent in eukaryotic genomes. They can adopt a triplex conformation in vitro under conditions that may exist in vivo, suggesting that triplex (H-) DNA may exist naturally in chromosomes. To explore this possibility and gain insight concerning potential functions, the distribution of triplex DNA was studied in fixed polytene chromosomes of Chironomus tentans and Drosophila melanogaster by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using an anti-triplex DNA monoclonal antibody (Jel 318). Chromosomes stained with this antibody exhibited immunopositive regions corresponding to condensed chromatin bands; interbands were less immunofluorescent. These results imply that there is more triplex DNA in bands than in interbands. In Chironomus, nucleolar organizer regions and Balbiani rings were immunonegative, indicating that triplex DNA is not present in decondensed, transcriptionally active chromatin. A few specific bands in both Chironomus and Drosophila were intensely immunofluorescent. In Drosophila, one such region was 81F on chromosome 3R. Competition during staining with exogenously added sequences corresponding to a constituent 1.672 g/cm3 satellite DNA in region 81F failed to abolish the immunofluorescence, suggesting that the satellite DNA does not fortuitously react with Jel 318 and implying that unidentified pur.pyr sequences forming triplex DNA are also present at this location. Region 81F exhibits ectopic pairing with nonrelated chromosome regions that have also proven to be intensely immunopositive; this suggests that the formation of triplex DNA between common, shared pur.pyr sequences in these otherwise nonhomologous bands might account for the ectopic pairing phenomenon. Together with our previous results, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that triplex DNA may play a role in chromosome organization by participating in regional chromatin condensation.

Animals↗

Triplex DNA in plasmids and chromosomes.

Circular plasmids containing pyrimidine purine tracts can form both inter-and intramolecular triplexes. Addition of poly(dTC) to plasmid pTC45, which contains a (TC)45.(GA)45 insert, results in intermolecular triplex formation. Agarose-gel electrophoresis gives rise to many well-resolved bands, which correspond to 1, 2, 3, 4... plasmid molecules attached to the added pyrimidine strand. In the electron microscope these complexes appear as a rosette of petals. The mobility of these triplex-containing complexes can be retarded by the addition of a triplex-specific monoclonal antibody, Jel318. Intramolecular triplex formation can be demonstrated at pH 5 in pTC45 and also in pT463-I, a plasmid containing a segment of a crab satellite DNA with both (G)n.(C)n and (TCC)n.(GGA)n inserts. However, although the intermolecular triplex remains stable for some time at pH 8, intramolecular triplex formation only occurs at low pH. Triplexes can also be detected by an immunoblotting procedure with Jel318. This unfamiliar structure is readily demonstrated in eukaryotic extracts, but not in cell extracts from Escherichia coli. Triplexes may thus be an inherent feature of eukaryotic chromosome structure.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Morphological and biochemical effects of endonucleases on isolated mammalian chromosomes in vitro.

Endonuclease digestion of isolated and unfixed mammalian metaphase chromosomes in vitro was examined as a means to study the higher-order regional organization of chromosomes related to banding patterns and the mechanisms of endonuclease-induced banding. Isolated mouse LM cell chromosomes, digested with the restriction enzymes AluI, HaeIII, EcoRI, BstNI, AvaII, or Sau96I, demonstrated reproducible G- and/or C-banding at the cytological level depending on the enzyme and digestion conditions. At the molecular level, specific DNA alterations were induced that correlated with the banding patterns produced. The results indicate that: (1) chromatin extraction is intimately involved in the mechanism of endonuclease-induced chromosome banding. (2) The extracted DNA fragments are variable in size, ranging from 200 bp to more than 4 kb in length. (3) For HaeIII, there appears to be variation in the rate of restriction site cleavage in G- and R-bands; HaeIII sites appear to be more rapidly cleaved in R-bands than in G-bands. (4) AluI and HaeIII ultimately produce banding patterns that reflect regional differences in the distribution of restriction sites along the chromosome. (5) BstNI restriction sites in the satellite DNA of constitutive heterochromatin are not cleaved intrachromosomally, probably reflecting an inaccessibility of the BstNI sites to enzyme due to the condensed nature of this chromatin or specific DNA-protein interactions. This implies that some enzymes may induce banding related to regional differences in the accessibility of restriction sites along the chromosome. (6) Several specific nonhistone protein differences were noted in the extracted and residual chromatin following an AluI digestion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Immunofluorescent staining of mammalian nuclei and chromosomes with a monoclonal antibody to triplex DNA.

Triplex DNA is an unusual conformation of DNA formed when two pyrimidine nucleotide strands share a common purine strand. A monoclonal antibody, demonstrated by numerous criteria to be specific for triplex DNA, was used to investigate the presence and distribution of this unique DNA configuration in nuclei and chromosomes of mouse LM cells and human lymphocytes. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that constitutive heterochromatin in acetic-methanol fixed mouse nuclei was usually, but not always immunofluorescent, suggesting possible cell cycle related variations in the amount of triplex DNA or its accessibility in this condensed chromatin. In fixed mouse and human chromosomes, there was a positive correlation between immunofluorescent staining patterns, Hoechst 33258 banding, and G- and/or C-banding patterns. Unfixed, isolated mouse chromosomes also reacted positively with the antibody, particularly when they were gently decondensed by exposure to low ionic conditions at neutral pH. This result indicates that fixation is not mandatory for antibody staining, suggesting that some mammalian chromosomal DNA may be naturally organized in a triplex configuration. However, there is a possibility that fixation may facilitate the formation of additional triplex DNA complexes in potential sequences or expose previously inaccessible triplex DNA. The precise correspondence between the immunofluorescent patterns produced by anti-triplex DNA antibodies and G- and C-bands known to represent regions of chromatin condensation, suggests a potential role of triplex DNA in chromosome structure and regional chromatin condensation.

Animals↗

A monoclonal antibody to triplex DNA binds to eucaryotic chromosomes.

A monoclonal antibody (Jel 318) was produced by immunizing mice with poly[d(TmC)].poly[d(GA)].poly[d(mCT) which forms a stable triplex at neutral pH. Jel 318 did not bind to calf thymus DNA or other non pyrimidine.purine DNAs such as poly[d(TG)].poly[d(CA)]. In addition the antibody did not recognize pyrimidine.purine DNAs containing mA (e.g. poly[d(TC)].poly[d(GmA)]) which cannot form a triplex since the methyl group blocks Hoogsteen base-pairing. The binding of Jel 318 to chromosomes was assessed by immunofluorescent microscopy of mouse myeloma cells which had been fixed in methanol/acetic acid. An antibody specific for duplex DNA (Jel 239) served as a control. The fluorescence due to Jel 318 was much weaker than that of Jel 239 but binding to metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei was observed. The staining by Jel 318 was unaffected by addition of E. coli DNA but it was obliterated in the presence of triplex. Since an acid pH favours triplex formation, nuclei were also prepared from mouse melanoma cells by fixation in cold acetone. Again Jel 318 showed weak but consistent staining of the nuclei. Therefore it seems likely that triplexes are an inherent feature of the structure of eucaryotic DNA.

Animals↗

Endonuclease banding of isolated mammalian metaphase chromosomes.

Evidence is presented that endonuclease digestion of isolated, unfixed chromosomes results in the production of banding patterns similar to those produced by digestion of fixed, air-dried chromosomes. Mouse L cell chromosomes were isolated under acidic or relatively neutral pH conditions, exposed in situ (as wet mounts on glass slides) or in vitro (in suspension) to micrococcal nuclease, Alu I or Eco RI, treated with a buffered salt solution, and stained with Giemsa. After any of these endonuclease treatments in situ, the centromeric regions of the chromosomes were intensely stained, characteristic of the C-banding observed in fixed chromosomes exposed to the same treatments. Although the fixed chromosomes were morphologically well-preserved after endonuclease digestion, the morphology of chromosomes digested in situ was variable, ranging from normal to swollen to highly distorted chromosomes. In the latter, the endonucleases induced dispersion of non-C-band chromatin; however, C-bands were still apparent as condensed, differentially-stained regions. Exposure of isolated chromosomes to Alu I in vitro also resulted in well-defined C-banding and led to the extraction of about 70% of the chromosomal DNA. From these results, the mechanism of endonuclease-induced C-banding appears to involve the dispersion and extraction of digested chromatin.

Animals↗

Fractionation of micrococcal nuclease-digested chromatin solubilized at physiologic ionic strength.

When mouse brain nuclei are optimally digested with micrococcal nuclease, most of the chromatin is soluble in a 180 mM salt/1 mM EDTA buffer [1]. At this ionic concentration, chromatin maintains its native structure [2]. In an attempt to selectively extract different fractions of chromatin from digested nuclei, we have examined the differential solubility of chromatin in the 180 mM salt buffer containing concentrations of MgCl2 ranging from 2 to 0 mM. The results suggest that digested chromatin may be fractionated into specific soluble chromatin fractions which correspond to nuclease-sensitive chromatin, bulk chromatin, and heterochromatin. These soluble fractions have a high molecular weight (up to 20 kbp), and contain a full complement of histones as well as a complex assortment of non-histone proteins. The residual insoluble fraction may be equivalent to a native, nuclear matrix-bound chromatin fraction.

Animals↗

The effects of sodium and magnesium-ion interactions on chromatin structure and solubility.

The effects of sodium and magnesium-ion interactions on chromatin structure and solubility were examined in isolated mouse liver nuclei. To facilitate this study, a simple assay of chromatin structure was developed, based on the absorbances at 260 nm (A260) and 320 nm (A320) of nuclei in test solutions. By subtracting the A320 from the A260, a single "spectral index" was obtained which served as a useful, but not absolute, indicator of chromatin structure. Electron microscopy verified the validity of this approach. The results indicate that either 200 mM NaCl or 0.5 mM MgCl2 were capable of preserving the native 20 to 30 nm chromatin fiber structure. Below 200 mM NaCl, the native fiber progressively uncoiled to the 10 nm unit fiber. The presence of 0.5 mM MgCl2 inhibited this uncoiling. Only divalent cations stabilized condensed chromatin (heterochromatin) within the nucleus. Monovalent and divalent cations interacted with one another at critical concentrations and modified their individual effects on chromatin structure; e.g., 10 to 25 mM NaCl interfered with the action of 0.5 to 1.5 mM MgCl2, causing a complete loss of condensed chromatin. Maximum solubility of micrococcal nuclease-digested chromatin occurred at 10 mM NaCl, which treatment allowed the chromatin to unfold to the 10 nm fiber. However, ionic conditions that disrupted condensed chromatin but maintained the native chromatin fiber morphology still resulted in relatively high yields of soluble chromatin. Minimum solubility occurred under conditions which preserved the structure of condensed chromatin.

Animals↗

Silver staining of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes.

To investigate a possible relationship between the core-like structures seen in silver-stained chromosomes (prepared by standard cytogenetic methods) and the scaffolds observed in histone-depleted chromosomes, the ability of the scaffold to stain with silver has been examined. Isolated chromosomes were histone-depleted by washing in ammonium acetate or by spreading the chromosomes on an ammonium acetate hypophase. The residual chromosome structures were carbon-platinum shadowed or stained with silver, and then examined by electron microscopy. The results provide clear evidence that the scaffold structure has a high affinity for silver and is therefore similar in its silver-staining potential to the core structure in standard chromosomes. This suggests that the silver core in standard chromosomes may represent the scaffold visualized by histone depletion. The peripherally dispersed DNA radiating from the scaffold also proved to be silver-reactive, and additional experiments demonstrated that purified DNA is capable of binding silver. This result indicates that cytological silver staining is not simply a matter of staining protein, as has previously been thought, but may also involve the staining of chromosomal DNA. In the ammonium acetate-treated and carbon-platinum-shadowed preparations, the scaffold structure was highly variable in its morphology and appeared to be composed of undispersed or incompletely dehistonized chromatin fibers. The silver-stained scaffold reflected this variability. Taken together with other evidence, these findings lead to a questioning of the reality of chromosome core structures.

Acetates↗

The effect of chromosome banding techniques on the proteins of isolated chromosomes.

Experiments were undertaken to determine the effect of various chromosome banding treatments on the histone and nonhistone proteins of isolated, fixed, air-dried metaphase chromosomes. Chromosome preparations were exposed to G-banding (SSC, urea, NaCl-urea, or trypsin), R-banding (Earle's balanced salt solution), and C-banding (NaOH or Ba(OH)2) treatments, and the extracted and residual proteins were examined by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The results indicate that each of the banding treatments induce characteristic alterations in the chromosomal proteins. The residual proteins left in chromosomes after the diverse G-banding treatments were generally similar to one another, indicating that treatments inducing the same type of banding have similar effects on the chromosomal proteins. This was also true for the two different C-banding treatments. On the other hand, the residual protein patterns seen after the G-banding treatments were strikingly different from those seen after R-banding, which in turn differed from those seen after C-banding. The treatments inducing different types of banding therefore produce markedly different effects on the chromosomal proteins. These protein alterations may have an important influence on the induction of chromosome bands.

Animals↗

Electron microscopy of silver-stained core-like structures in metaphase chromosomes.

Chinese hamster metaphase chromosomes, stained with ammoniacal silver and examined by electron microscopy, were covered with fine silver grains of variable size. In addition, many chromosomes contained linear aggregates of silver grains running continuously from one end of each chromatid to the other, forming a core-like structure. Extensive deposits of silver were observed over the nucleolar organizers and the centromeric regions, and the silver precipitate in the latter region appeared to be a localized differentiation of the core-like structure. The silver cores ranged from thin to thick and continuous to discontinuous elements in different chromosomes. This extreme variability suggests that these cores are not true structural components of chromosomes. The amount of silver deposit over any given chromosome region may simply reflect the concentration of chromatin in that region of the chromosome. The silver-stained core-like structure probably reflects an underlying difference in the concentration of chromatin in the central and peripheral region of each chromatid. Such differences in chromatin concentration may be induced during the prolonged hypotonic treatment required for the subsequent visualization of cores.

Animals↗