PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G D Sherwood

Publications and source records attributed to G D Sherwood.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Identifying and addressing medical errors in pain mismanagement.

BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence in the pain management literature that undertreatment of pain is pervasive despite several approaches, including use of national guidelines, to completely correct the problem. Although the concept of medical errors has primarily been concerned with adverse events, it is not unreasonable that mismanagement of pain could also be classified as a medical error. ERRORS OF PAIN MANAGEMENT: Error types can be classified as errors in assessment and documentation, errors in treatment and management, and errors in patient education. Within each of these categories, errors may be skill-, rule-, and/or knowledge-based, as suggested by evidence of mismanagement in various aspects of the pain management process as found in the literature. An examination of the root causes of medical errors may be used to detect system failures. At least ten steps can be identified in the process of pain management in the acute care setting, starting with admission, and errors can potentially occur at any step. A redesigned system could help improve error rates by incorporating use of skills, rules, and knowledge for effective management. CONCLUSION: A new approach to the unsolved problem of pain management in acute care settings is proposed; this approach uses the concept of mismanagement as a medical error.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Pain management outcomes for hospitalized Hispanic patients.

The purposes of the study were to describe outcomes of pain management and predictors of patient satisfaction in a minority sample. By using a survey design, 3 instruments were used to collect data: (1) The American Pain Society's Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Modified, a 16-item self-report tool about pain and patient satisfaction; (2) a demographic form; and (3) the Pain Management Index. The sample consisted of 104 hospitalized Hispanic inpatients in a Rio Grande Valley hospital. Mean ratings for current and average pain were moderate, whereas severe mean ratings were reported for worst pain. High interference caused by pain was found for walking and sleep. Patients were satisfied with pain management. However, a negative correlation was found between satisfaction and current pain intensity (r = -.49, p = .001). Pain Management Index scores revealed that 36% of the participants were inadequately treated for pain; also, negative correlations with age indicated less effective management for elders. Reliability estimates for tool subscales were greater than 0.70 except for the Beliefs subscale (0.63). By using logistic regression, satisfaction with pain management was predicted by general pain in the last 24 hours (odds ratio = 4.02), pain-related interference with mood (odds ratio = 7.31), and age (odds ratio = 1.8). Clinical implications include the need to apply standardized guidelines, such as those from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, and to educate patients, particularly minority elders, about pain management approaches. The emergence of Hispanics as the fastest growing minority group increases the need for research regarding pain management outcomes to plan more effective intervention.

Adult↗

Using collaborative research to facilitate student learning.

Developing research partnerships between academia and the service sector is an innovative way to meet the demand for high-quality, cost-effective, and clinically oriented research. Undergraduate student participation in clinical research is an educational strategy to facilitate positive mindsets toward research. This article outlines the methodological steps in recruiting and training undergraduate students for clinical research teams to benefit nurse educators, nurse researchers, students, and institutional partners. Student volunteers collected data for a study examining patient satisfaction with pain management practices. The research proposal was used to demonstrate principles of the research process and to familiarize the students with the study. A detailed study protocol guided the entire team through the project. Student sensitivity to pain assessment and management was enhanced. Learning the research process and the students' appreciation for the rigors of research were reinforced using this experiential model. Student evaluation of the research experience is presented.

Clinical Nursing Research↗

The power of nurse-client encounters. Interpreting spiritual themes.

Both clients and caregivers are confronted with their own spiritual needs in the search for meaning within the health care experience. Yet, time for reflection on the powerful nature and mutuality of care giving is often crowded out by the busyness and intensity of health care. Using a guided reflection technique, 40 nurse participants in five focus groups examined a written nurse-client encounter. Qualitative analysis of the merged data yielded five common themes and descriptive patterns: common elements in the encounter, descriptors portraying the encounter, meanings conveyed by the illness, spiritual needs uncovered, and a framework to apply to practice. Caregivers must be able to see illness as a meaning-intensive experience to be able to help clients understand their own spirituality. The reciprocity of the spiritual connection in health care encounters is proposed as a significant factor in renewal, satisfaction, and healing outcomes for both nurse and client.

Adult↗

Assessing clinical outcomes: patient satisfaction with pain management.

The problem of unresolved pain in hospitalized patients is costly both in monetary terms and in patient comfort. Concern about patients' satisfaction and well-being led to a study to determine the characteristics of the pain experience as reported by the hospitalized patients. This study also examined the recently revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ), particularly in regard to results from newly added items and overall reliability and validity. The data provide a cross-sectional description of patients' experience with pain in a large, urban teaching hospital. One hundred fifty-seven adult subjects reported moderate to high levels of current pain intensity, worst pain, and general level of pain in the last 24 hr, as well as moderate to high rates of pain-related interference with care activities. While patients indicated that they were satisfied with their pain management and with the responses of physicians and nurses to complaints of pain, patient satisfaction was inversely and significantly correlated with pain now and general level of pain in the last 24 hr. When patients with high pain intensity (> 7) were separated into satisfied and dissatisfied groups for analysis, no significant differences were found regarding pain-related interference with various activities including mood, relationships, sleep, etc. The majority of patients indicated that they were still in pain, but 41% did not wish to receive a stronger dose of pain medication. Significant differences between those who did and did not want more pain medication were found in that younger patients were more likely to want more pain medication. Additionally, analysis of these two groups found that patients who were still in pain and desired more pain medication reported significantly higher levels of pain-related interference with activity and sleep. The inverse correlation of current pain intensity and general level of pain with overall satisfaction with pain management differs from findings of previous studies. One added item queried patients regarding approaches they had used to manage pain in the last 24 hr. Oral pain medications, prayer, intravenous and intramuscular injections were the top-ranked methods. The findings guide further analysis of the APS-POQ questionnaire. Recommendations of items to be retained in the questionnaire are made based on data analysis. Refining the questionnaire will allow health-care providers to increase their understanding of issues related to pain management. The findings provoke several questions for further study, such as what are age and ethnic differences regarding pain intensity and satisfaction, as well as the predictors of aversion of receiving more pain medication when pain persists.

Adult↗

Nurse practitioner descriptions for primary care centers: opportunities for ownership.

The drastic shift in health care delivery and the accompanying emphasis on health care outcomes has contributed to a rapid proliferation of nurse practitioner services. Prepared as advanced practice nurses with specific assessment skills, primary care nurse practitioners have the opportunity to be participant players rather than observers in business negotiations. To gain a market share of the expanding field, these nurses must assert their position on establishing primary care centers. This qualitative study focused on nurse practitioner descriptions of their needs in a university primary care group practice. Four major response patterns, Vision, Structure, Incentives, and Significance, were clarified by multiple themes defined by explanatory elements for a research-based topology to guide nurse practitioners and schools into positions of ownership of primary care centers in interdisciplinary partnerships.

Commerce↗

Meta-synthesis of qualitative analyses of caring: defining a therapeutic model of nursing.

Documenting and understanding caring are essential to explain client outcomes from nursing actions and to predict client well-being and health. To prepare for development of an outcomes-based operational model of caring, metasynthesis provided a method to aggregate findings from 16 qualitative studies on caring. Four essential, dynamic patterns emerged for a state-of-the-science description of nurses' caring from the patient perspective: interaction, knowledge, intentional response, and therapeutic outcomes. The patterns with their explanatory themes defined caring within the content, context, process, and outcomes of an operational model, providing the structure for research into the therapeutics of caring that will advance nursing practice.

Humans↗

Site coordinators: a critical component in providing quality nursing education at distance sites.

The Site Coordinator performs a critical role in the success of distance education in both continuing education and the RN/BSN program. As the local agent, the Site Coordinator is essential for the development of a relationship between the main campus and the distance site. These important people can ease, guide, support, and promote the ongoing development of self-directed learning skills--essential tools for professional lifelong learning.

Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate↗

Distance education programs: defining issues of assessment, accessibility, and accommodation.

Identification and resolution of a variety of issues is imperative to establishing effective distance education via telecommunications. In this first-hand experience, the authors describe selected issues and possible responses inherent in the development and implementation of a new teaching modality. The decision to pursue distance education by telecommunications should be made only after a thorough examination of the needs, the required resources, and the changes to be expected. Advance planning is essential for problem solving.

Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate↗

The Pyramid Model: an integrated approach for evaluating continuing education programs and outcomes.

Recent mergers and downsizing of health care agencies have made resources for continuing education (CE) increasingly scarce. Nurse educators must demonstrate the effectiveness and sustainability of CE programs and establish the link between nursing professionalism and positive patient outcomes. The Pyramid Evaluation Model expands and enhances previous evaluation frameworks. Simple steps are outlined to evaluate CE programs and outcomes systematically and comprehensively through an impact model that examines goals, reviews program design, monitors program implementation, assesses outcomes and impact, and analyzes efficiency.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗