PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Douglas Letson

Publications and source records attributed to G Douglas Letson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of high-risk, high-grade, soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and body wall: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9514.

PURPOSE: On the basis of a positive reported single-institution pilot study, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group initiated phase II trial 9514 to evaluate its neoadjuvant regimen in a multi-institutional Intergroup setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility included a high-grade soft tissue sarcoma > or = 8 cm in diameter of the extremities and body wall. Patients received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT; modified mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine [MAID]), interdigitated preoperative radiation therapy (RT; 44 Gy administered in split courses), and three cycles of postoperative CT (modified MAID). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were enrolled, of whom 64 were analyzed. Seventy-nine percent of patients completed their preoperative CT and 59% completed all planned CT. Three patients (5%) experienced fatal grade 5 toxicities (myelodysplasias, two patients; infection, one patient). Another 53 patients (83%) experienced grade 4 toxicities; 78% experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity and 19% experienced grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity. Sixty-one patients underwent surgery. Fifty-eight of these were R0 resections, of which five were amputations. There were three R1 resections. The estimated 3-year rate for local-regional failure is 17.6% if amputation is considered a failure and 10.1% if not. Estimated 3-year rates for disease-free, distant-disease-free, and overall survival are 56.6%, 64.5%, and 75.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This combined-modality treatment can be delivered successfully in a multi-institutional setting. Efficacy results are consistent with previous single-institution results.

Adult↗

Diagnostic imaging update: soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: No single imaging approach is ideal for every tumor. While radiography can be effective for diagnosis of specific tumors, additional imaging is often required. Soft tissue sarcomas require a multimodality approach. METHODS: The authors discuss the general imaging approaches for patients who present with soft tissue masses, the fundamental principles inherent to tumor imaging, and the specific applications of newer imaging modalities. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as the preferred technique for evaluating soft tissue tumors but is limited in demonstrating the pattern of soft tissue calcification. Computed tomography is the best modality for evaluating osseous architecture and for patients who cannot be evaluated with MRI. PET is helpful in metabolic imaging, and ultrasonography is useful in differentiating cystic from solid masses. Magnetic resonance angiography accurately reveals the arterial and venous supply of vascular tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Current imaging techniques provide numerous noninvasive methods to diagnose and stage suspected soft tissue sarcomas.

Biopsy↗