Interview: G.E. Alan Dever, MT, PhD. Interview by Patricia L. Gerrity.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G E Dever.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Researchers disagree about the extent to which limited access to health services negatively affects health. In this study, we investigated the association of health status with access to high blood pressure medication among hypertensive respondents drawn from two random household surveys conducted in the state of Georgia during 1981 and 1983. We compared hypertensive respondents reporting difficulties in paying for medication (n = 616) with hypertensive respondents not reporting cost problems (n = 616) who were matched on race, sex, age (+/- 3 years), and per capita family income (+/- $3,000). Because questions were not identical in the 1981 and 1983 surveys, we compared responses of the matched groups separately for each year in the analysis. In the 1981 comparison, a significantly higher (P less than .05) percentage of hypertensive individuals experiencing cost problems reported being in fair or poor health (60.5%) and having had a stroke (11.4%) than those without cost problems (39% for fair or poor health status and 5% for occurrence of stroke). Those with cost problems also reported a higher frequency of cardiac problems (24.6%) than those without cost problems (18.1%), although these differences are not statistically significant (P greater than .05). In the 1983 survey, a significantly larger number of those with cost problems (57.4%) reported being in fair or poor health than those without cost problems (43.1%, P less than .05).
This paper examines the relationship between mortality and ruralness in the state of Georgia. In 1979, the rural Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) for deaths from all causes was significantly higher than expected when compared to statewide levels, while the urban SMR was significantly lower (p less than 0.01). Of the 13 leading causes of death, 9 had rural SMRs significantly higher than expected, while only homicide had a significantly greater urban SMR (p less than 0.01). Although much of the rural/urban difference in overall mortality is attributed to the fact that the rural population is older, figures adjusted for age and race still reveal that the rural death rate is significantly higher than the urban rate (p less than 0.01). Furthermore, there are several specific differences when analyzed by cause of death, age, and race that remain unexplained. Specific rural health problems include congenital anomalies, motor vehicle and other accidents, heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease. Specific urban health problems include homicides and cancer. In addition to metropolitan status, a second indicator of ruralness, county population size, was used to analyze the data and produced similar results. As county population size increases, the total mortality decreases.