PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Feld

Publications and source records attributed to G Feld.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Optimized standby rate reduces the ventricular rate variability in pacemaker patients with atrial fibrillation.

Patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptomatic bradycardia often receive ventricular-based pacemakers. However, many of these patients continue to have symptoms of palpitations, which may be due to ventricular rate variability. It has previously been shown that continuous ventricular pacing during AF has a stabilizing effect on the ventricular rate. Hence, a study was initiated to determine whether a patient-specific optimal ventricular standby rate that reduces the ventricular rate variability, without over-pacing, could be predicted. A ventricular rate stabilization (VRS) pacing algorithm that increases the pacing rate until instability is reduced below a threshold was developed. The VRS algorithm was utilized to determine a patient-specific standby rate in 15 patients with chronic AF, intact AV nodal conduction, and implanted pacemakers. The computer algorithm controlled a pacemaker programmer to automatically change the pacemaker's ventricular pacing rate via telemetry. Patients were studied for 15 minutes with VRS and for 15 minutes with 50 ppm fixed rate pacing (control). The results were as follows: (1) VRS versus control = P < 0.05; (2) mean ventricular pacing rate (ppm): 77 +/- 13 versus 50 +/- 0; (3) mean ventricular rate (beats/min): 82 +/- 13 versus 79 +/- 12; (4) ventricular rate coefficient of variation (%): 11 +/- 1 versus 22 +/- 5; (5) percent pacing: 75 +/- 8 versus 6 +/- 8; (6) percent of RR intervals less than minimum pacing interval eliminated: 58 +/- 12; (8) regression analysis: mean VRS pacing rate (beats/min) = 0.96 x mean control ventricular rate + 2.3, r2 = 0.85. We concluded that: (1) a moderate increase in the ventricular pacing rate was required to substantially stabilize the ventricular rate; (2) the resulting mean ventricular rate increased marginally; (3) a majority of RR cycles less than each patient's minimum pacing interval were eliminated; and (4) there was a linear relationship between the mean ventricular rate during control and the optimal ventricular pacing rate. Thus, a ventricular pacing rate close to the mean ventricular rate during control consistently reduced the ventricular variability. Although pacing at an increased ventricular standby rate reduces variability at rest, the optimal solution would likely be an adaptive rate algorithm that changes the ventricular standby rate as the mean intrinsic rate varies.

Aged↗
PubMed1986

Arrhythmia control by selective lengthening of cardiac repolarization: role of N-acetylprocainamide, active metabolite of procainamide.

In recent years, data has become available to support the concept that a selective lengthening of the cardiac action potential (a Class III antiarrhythmic action) by whatever mechanism with an attendant increase in the effective refractory period constitutes a distinct antiarrhythmic mechanism. Such an action is exemplified clinically by hypocalemia and hypothyroidism and pharmacologically by amiodarone, sotalol and bretylium, all of which have other associated features. The N-acetylation of procainamide leads to the pharmacologically active compound, N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA). The loss of propensity to block depolarization with the preservation of the effect on repolarization in the case of NAPA makes the compound a class III antiarrhythmic agent. The process of N-acetylation has also led to longer elimination half-life and predominantly renal excretion with linear kinetics but with the preservation of the antiarrhythmic properties of the parent compound. The electrophysiologic data are consistent with the results of studies which have demonstrated that NAPA has the potential to suppress premature ventricular contractions and prevent spontaneously occurring as well inducible ventricular tachycardia in patients with heart disease. The effects on atria indicate that the drug has the potential to electively reverse atrial flutter and fibrillation to normal rhythm and maintain stability of sinus rhythm. The overall experimental and clinical data warrant further evaluation of NAPA as an antiarrhythmic agent.

Acecainide↗
PubMed1985

Comparative electrophysiologic profiles of calcium antagonists with particular reference to bepridil.

The calcium antagonist bepridil hydrochloride differs pharmacologically from the conventional agents that block the myocardial slow channel. Its clinical electrophysiologic effects are poorly defined. The effects of 2 mg/kg + 1 mg/kg of intravenously administered bepridil in 10 patients were compared with those of 3 mg/kg + 1 mg/kg in 9 patients undergoing electrophysiologic evaluation of clinical symptoms. The overall effects of the 2 regimens did not differ significantly. The drug reduced the heart rate slightly; it had no effect on the PR interval but significantly lengthened the AH interval by 2 to 10%, HV by 2 to 12% and QTc by 5 to 8%. The most striking effect was the prolongation of the functional (up to 17%, p less than 0.001) and the effective (up to 13%, p less than 0.001) refractory periods of the atrioventricular node with a lengthening of the Wenckebach cycle (up to 17%, p less than 0.001). In contrast to the action of verapamil, bepridil significantly prolonged the ventricular (4 to 7%, p less than 0.01 to p less than 0.001) and the atrial (12 to 19%, p less than 0.05 to p less than 0.001) effective refractory periods. The data indicate that bepridil hydrochloride has a wide spectrum of electrophysiologic activity in man consistent with inhibitory actions on myocardial slow and fast channels and a significant lengthening of cardiac repolarization. These overall effects suggest that the antiarrhythmic profile of the drug is likely to be wider than those of conventional calcium antagonists.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Mexiletine: double-blind comparison with procainamide in PVC suppression and open-label sequential comparison with amiodarone in life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

The antiarrhythmic effects of mexiletine (n = 14) were compared to procainamide (n = 16) by a double-blind parallel protocol in 30 patients (group I) with frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (greater than 20/hr), and to amiodarone by an open-label sequential approach in 25 patients (mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 32.6 +/- 13.4%) with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (group II) resistant to two or more conventional agents. The predetermined end point of therapy in group I patients was met in 6 of 14 (43%) given mexiletine, with 7 (50%) requiring drug discontinuation for severe gastrointestinal or central nervous system side effects and only 3 of 16 patients (19%) given procainamide, with 5 (31%) developing limiting side effects. Increases in dose led to a higher efficacy rate for PVC suppression with a corresponding increase in side effects with mexiletine; with procainamide, the higher dose was not associated with greater PVC suppression. In group II patients, mexiletine was effective in 4 (16%), with one patient discontinuing the drug during long-term therapy; mexiletine was ineffective in 16 (64%) and early side effects developed in 5 (20%). Patients not responding to or not tolerating mexiletine were given amiodarone; 20 of 21 (95%) responded with arrhythmia control after the loading dose. During a mean follow-up period of 2 years, sudden death occurred in two patients, death from heart failure in two, and death from subarachnoid hemorrhage in one patient; 15 (75%) patients are alive and free of arrhythmia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic effects of sotalol in patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Sotalol is a unique beta-blocker that lengthens cardiac repolarization and effective refractory period (ERP). Its efficacy after intravenous (1.5 mg/kg) and oral (160 to 480 mg bid) administration was therefore evaluated in 37 patients with refractory recurrent ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). Thirty-five patients, 33 with inducible VT/VF, underwent electrophysiologic testing. Intravenous sotalol lengthened the ERP in the atrium (+24.6%, p less than .01), atrioventricular node (+24.9%, p less than .01), and ventricle (+14.9%, p less than .01). It also significantly lengthened sinus node recovery time, corrected QT interval (QTc), and the AH interval, but not the HV interval. Sotalol prevented reinduction of VT/VF in 15 patients (45.5%). Twenty-five of the 33 patients (15 with positive results of electrophysiologic tests; 10 with negative results) were given oral sotalol. The drug was ineffective in seven (26.9%) and aggravated arrhythmia in one (3.8%). In four patients sotalol was withdrawn because of side effects; arrhythmias recurred late in two (7.7%). Eleven patients (42.3%) have continued on oral sotalol over a mean follow-up period of 9.2 +/- 8.6 months. Sotalol reduced (n = 21) total premature ventricular complex (PVC) count on the Holter electrocardiogram by 73% (p less than .01), paired PVCs by 89% (p less than .01), and beats of ventricular tachycardia by 95% (p less than .01). In 52% (n = 11), total reduction in PVCs was at least 85%, and incidence of paired and tachycardiac beats was reduced at least 90% (group A). In the remainder (n = 10), PVC suppression was not significant (group B). Group A included nine patients with nonreinducible VT/VF and two in whom it was reinducible; in group B, eight of 10 patients had reinducible VT/VF. The difference between the two groups (Fisher exact test) was significant (p less than .01). The prevention of reinduction of VT/VF by intravenous sotalol and suppression of spontaneously occurring arrhythmias by the oral drug were both predictive of long-term drug efficacy. Sotalol is a significant advance in the short- and long-term management of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Control of sudden recurrent arrhythmic deaths: role of amiodarone.

Patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have electrical instability of the myocardium, with 30% to 40% propensity for recurrent arrest in the first year. About 85% to 90% of such patients have complex ventricular ectopy and runs of ventricular tachycardia; in 70% to 80%, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation are inducible by programmed electrical stimulation. The attempt to control recurrent cardiac arrest using these parameters and conventional antiarrhythmic drugs has yielded conflicting or variable results. Amiodarone was therefore studied in 40 consecutive patients (with previous cardiac arrests) in whom conventional antiarrhythmic therapy had proved ineffective or was not tolerated. The mean ejection fraction of the group was 0.29 +/- 0.12. At a mean follow-up of 16 months (range 5 to 40 months) six patients had died, three from heart failure, one from liver failure (not drug induced), and two from sudden (presumably arrhythmic) death. Late occurrences of arrhythmia were found in two patients (complicated by digitalis intoxication in one). Ambulatory ECG recordings showed that amiodarone had a potent suppressant effect on ventricular ectopy and runs of VT, but electrophysiologic studies demonstrated that it did not inhibit inducible VT/VF in greater than 65% despite an excellent clinical outcome. Limiting adverse reaction was seen in only one patient; other relatively minor side effects occurred in 10% to 15% of patients receiving maintenance therapy. Our data provide further evidence for the effectiveness of amiodarone in life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, with a potential for the prolongation of survival in patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

Amiodarone↗
PubMed1983

Amiodarone in refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Ninety-six patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias refractory to two or more conventional agents were treated with amiodarone and followed for 6 to 40 months (mean, 15 months). Currently, 75 are alive and well. Seven patients died from nonarrhythmic and five from arrhythmic causes. Nonfatal arrhythmias recurred in four patients, one with early and three with late onset. Intolerable side effects occurred in five patients but heart failure was not aggravated by the drug. On 24-hour Holter recordings done before and serially during therapy in 72 patients, amiodarone eliminated episodes of ventricular tachycardia and complex ectopy and reduced total ectopic beat counts by 90% or more in all but 4 patients. In contrast, ventricular tachycardia inducible by programmed electrical stimulation was suppressed in only 50% of patients, but failure of such suppression did not compromise an excellent clinical outcome. Thus, amiodarone is highly effective in the prophylaxis of recurrent refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Acute Disease↗