PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Fowler

Publications and source records attributed to G Fowler.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

HIV/AIDS-related attitudes and practices of hospital-based health workers in Kampala, Uganda.

OBJECTIVE: To assess HIV/AIDS-related attitudes and practices of hospital-based health workers in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Mulago Hospital, the main national referral hospital in Uganda. A total of 155 physicians and nurses completed a brief questionnaire on HIV risk perception, attitudes and practices regarding AIDS prevention education, HIV counseling and testing and care of patients with HIV disease. RESULTS: Twenty-nine per cent of health workers reported never having discussed AIDS prevention with patients, 26% had never referred patients for HIV counseling and 31% had never advised patients suspected of HIV infection to be tested. Frequent explanations for not providing AIDS prevention education included time constraints and/or lack of related knowledge or skills. While 29% perceived recapping needles as involving no risk, activities involving casual contact with patients and condom use for protection against HIV infection were associated with a high perceived risk of HIV transmission, particularly among nurses. Physicians and nurses differed in their HIV/AIDS-related attitudes and practices. The physicians had a more positive attitude towards the care of patients with HIV disease. In addition, 80% of physicians compared to 59% of nurses referred patients for HIV counseling. A similar trend was found for advising patients to obtain HIV testing. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-based health workers are missing important opportunities for AIDS prevention education with their patients. There are gaps in their knowledge about HIV and related infection control practices. Interventions should address their concerns and barriers to HIV prevention practices.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1996

Costs and cost effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: the Oxcheck study.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the costs and cost effectiveness of the Oxcheck cardiovascular risk factor screening and intervention programme. DESIGN: Cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial using clinical and economic data taken from the trial. SETTING: Five general practices in Luton and Dunstable, England. SUBJECTS: 2205 patients who attended a health check in 1989-90 and were scheduled for re-examination in 1992-3 (intervention group); 1916 patients who attended their initial health check in 1992-3 (control group). Participants were men and women aged 35-64 years. INTERVENTION: Health check conducted by nurse, with health education and follow up according to degree of risk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost of health check programme; cost per 1% reduction in coronary risk. RESULTS: Health check and follow up cost 29.27 pounds per patient. Estimated programme cost per 1% reduction in coronary risk per participant was between 1.46 pounds and 2.25 pounds; it was nearly twice as much for men as women. CONCLUSIONS: The cost to the practice of implementing Oxcheck-style health checks in an average sized practice of 7500 patients would be 47,000 pounds, a proportion of which could be paid for through staff pay reimbursements and Band Three health promotion target payments. This study highlights the considerable difficulties faced when calculating the costs and benefits of a health promotion programme. Economic evaluations should be integrated into the protocols of randomised controlled trials to enable judgments to be made on the relative cost effectiveness of different prevention strategies.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Smoking and cancer: smoking cessation.

Smoking is the single most important cause of cancer. The risk of developing cancer is reduced by stopping smoking and decreases substantially after five years. Reduction in smoking must be central to any programme aimed seriously at the prevention of cancer. An individual approach, based in primary care, has the potential to bring about modest but important reductions in risk. Many randomised trials have shown the effectiveness of various smoking cessation interventions in primary care. Given resource limitations in primary care, individual effort should be focused on those at highest risk who are motivated to stop smoking. A population strategy has considerable advantages over the high risk approach as the potential for reducing morbidity and mortality in the whole population is much greater. The government must acknowledge its major responsibility; the outstanding example of its failure to do this is its persistent refusal to ban outright all forms of advertising and promotion of tobacco. There is clear evidence that a ban would contribute to a reduction in smoking prevalence and especially in the uptake of smoking by children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Meta-analysis on efficacy of nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation.

Nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT) by gum, transdermal patch, intranasal spray, or inhalation is expensive but how effective is it? We have done a meta-analysis of controlled trials to see how effects on abstinence rates are influenced by the clinical setting, the level of nicotine dependency, the dosage of NRT, and the intensity of additional advice and support offered. Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials of NRT that have assessed abstinence at least 6 months after the start of NRT were identified and 53 trials (42 gum, 9 patch, 1 intranasal spray, 1 inhaler), with data from 17,703 subjects, were included in the analyses. Use of NRT increased the odds ratio (OR) of abstinence to 1.71 (95% confidence interval 1.56-1.87) compared with those allocated to the control interventions. The ORs for the different forms of NRT were 1.61 for gum, 2.07 for transdermal patch, 2.92 for nasal spray, and 3.05 for inhaled nicotine. These odds were non-significantly higher in subjects with higher levels of nicotine dependence but they were largely independent of the intensity of additional support provided or the setting in which NRT was offered. We conclude that the currently available forms of NRT are effective therapies to aid smoking cessation.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1994

The effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) (including gum, transdermal patch, intranasal spray, and inhaled preparations) in facilitating smoking cessation, and to determine whether the effect was influenced by the clinical setting in which the smoker was recruited and treated, the level of nicotine dependency, the dosage of NRT used, or the intensity of additional advice and support offered to the smoker. DATA SOURCES: Published trials of NRT were identified by a systematic search of 7 electronic databases, published reviews, reference lists from clinical trials, conference abstracts, smoking and health bulletins, and a bibliography on smoking and health. Unpublished trials were identified by approaching manufacturers of NRT. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 53 trials (42 gum, 9 patch, 1 intranasal spray, and 1 inhaler), with data from 17,703 patients, were included in the analyses. Only trials that assessed abstinence at least 6 months after the commencement of therapy were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted from the trial reports by 2 authors independently. Where the methodology was unclear or the results were not expressed in a form which allowed extraction of key data we wrote to the investigators for the required information. DATA SYNTHESIS: Use of NRT increased the odds ratio (OR) of abstinence to 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 1.87) compared with those who had been allocated to the control interventions. The OR for the different forms of NRT were 1.61 for nicotine gum (95% CI, 1.46 to 1.78), 2.07 (95% CI, 1.62 to 2.62) for transdermal patch, 2.92 (95% CI, 1.49 to 5.74) for nasal spray, and 3.05 for inhaled nicotine (95% CI, 1.42 to 6.57). These odds were not significantly higher in patients with higher levels of nicotine dependence (Fagerstrom score > or = 7; P = 0.06), but they were largely independent of the intensity of additional support provided or the setting in which the NRT was offered. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the currently available forms of NRT are effective therapies to aid smoking cessation.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1994

Smoking cessation methods: recommendations for health professionals. Advisory Group of the European School of Oncology.

Smoking is the leading preventable cause of death. Approximately 40% of Europeans now smoke. Many smokers want to stop but do not make the attempt, and of those who try, most are unsuccessful. Primary care health providers can help their patients to stop by using brief behavioural and pharmacological interventions. Specialised smoking cessation clinics can support selected patients referred by primary care providers. This report reviews intervention techniques for health care providers, which, in combination with effective legislative and educational interventions, can significantly reduce the prevalence of smoking.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

An assessment of lacidipine and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension.

1. The aim of this randomised, double-blind four way crossover study was to assess the interaction between the new calcium antagonist, lacidipine and atenolol, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. 2. Sitting blood pressure at 4 h post-dosing with lacidipine (4 mg) and atenolol (100 mg) alone was significantly lower compared with placebo (137/89 +/- 3/3 mmHg; 142/89 +/- 5/3 mmHg; and 154/98 +/- 5/3 mmHg respectively; P < 0.001). Co-administration of both drugs produced a significant additive effect compared with atenolol and lacidipine alone (124/80 +/- 4/2 mmHg; P < 0.002). 3. Heart rate on treatment with lacidipine alone was significantly greater at 4 h compared with placebo (86 +/- 1 beats min-1 and 74 +/- 2 beats min-1 respectively; P < 0.001). When both drugs were used in combination, there was a significant decrease in pulse rate compared with lacidipine alone (58 +/- 1 beats min-1 and 86 +/- 1 beats min-1 respectively; P < 0.001). 4. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed the statistically significant reduction in blood pressure on co-dosing (120/82 +/- 10/2 mmHg) compared with lacidipine (140/92 +/- 5/3 mmHg) and atenolol (146/90 +/- 6/3 mmHg) given alone (P < 0.05). 5. Lacidipine alone produced a significant exercise tachycardia compared with atenolol alone and the atenolol/lacidipine combination (97 +/- 8 beats min-1; 65 +/- 4 beats min-1 and 75 +/- 7 beats min-1 respectively; P < 0.001). Exercise tolerance was not adversely affected by the co-administration of both lacidipine and atenolol.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Colestipol at varying dosage intervals in the treatment of moderate hypercholesterolaemia.

1. Bile acid sequestrants such as colestipol are effective lipid lowering agents but have a poor reputation for tolerability particularly when administered at the originally recommended doses. We have investigated a low dosage regimen with varying dosage intervals in order to assess efficacy and tolerability. 2. This double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study was conducted to investigate the effect of varying administration schedules of colestipol (10 g daily), against placebo in reducing LDL cholesterol levels in patients with moderate hypercholesterolaemia on the American Heart Association step 1 diet. 3. Colestipol or matched placebo, was administered as 5 g twice daily (COL am/pm) or 10 g once daily in the morning (COL am) or evening (COL pm) at fixed times with meals. 4. All 98 patients who entered the initial 16 week dietary phase, subsequently entered the 12 week active treatment phase and were randomised to placebo or active treatment and to one of the three treatment schedules. Fasting lipid profiles were performed every 4 weeks during both phases. 5. All active treatments significantly reduced LDL and total cholesterol compared with placebo (COL am: 17% and 10%, COL pm: 18% and 10%, COL am/pm: 19% and 12% (P = 0.0001)). HDL cholesterol rose significantly with COL am (5% (P = 0.021)) and COL am/pm (7% (P = 0.002)) when compared with placebo while a marginal increase was seen with COL pm (4% (P = 0.063)). Colestipol tended to increase serum triglyceride concentrations but the changes were not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1993

An international perspective on the cholesterol debate.

For the past 5 years there has been an intensive debate and a number of conflicting guidelines suggesting what general practitioners (GPs) should do to screen and manage hyperlipidaemia. At a WONCA seminar in Vancouver in 1992, policies and guidelines from Canada, the UK, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Hong Kong and the USA were reviewed. It was concluded that cholesterol policy and guidelines tend to be influenced more by political and economic factors than by evidence of health benefit. International guidelines for cholesterol screening and management would be of minimal value, as GPs would have to interpret the epidemiological evidence of benefit from lipid screening and lipid lowering strategy in the context of each patient to arrive at optimum management.

Adult↗