PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Gershman

Publications and source records attributed to G Gershman.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Outcome after intestinal transplantation: results from one center's 9-year experience; discussion 1031-2.

HYPOTHESIS: Outcomes after intestinal transplantation have improved during the past decade with refinements in surgical techniques as well as advances in immunosuppression and antimicrobial therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care medical center, August 1991 through December 2000. PATIENTS: Adult (5) and pediatric (12) patients with intestinal failure. All developed complications from long-term total parenteral nutrition therapy. Median age was 8.6 years and median weight was 22 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Primary intestinal transplantation with (n = 14) or without (n = 3) the liver. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and graft survival, viral infections, rejection, and nutritional autonomy. RESULTS: Twenty-one intestinal grafts were transplanted into the 17 recipients. All donors were cadaveric and were matched by ABO blood group and size. Patient survival at 1 and 3 years was 63% and 55%, respectively. Death-censored graft survival at 1 and 3 years was 73% and 55%, respectively. There were 1.5 acute cellular rejection episodes per graft and 3 grafts were lost to rejection. Incidences of infection with the Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus were negligible with aggressive prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Nutritional autonomy was achieved in 69% of grafts surviving more than 30 days after intestinal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal transplantation is now the standard of therapy for patients with intestinal failure and complications resulting from total parenteral nutrition. Outcomes have markedly improved since initiation of the program. Aggressive immunosuppression as well as prophylaxis and preemptive antiviral therapy have led to low incidences of acute cellular rejection, Epstein-Barr virus, and cytomegalovirus. Finally, nutritional autonomy can be achieved after successful intestinal transplantation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagomyotomy for children with achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagomyotomy, consisting of a laparoscopic or thoracoscopic approach, has become a preferred surgical treatment for adults with achalasia. This multicenter study reports on the clinical status of children who have undergone minimally invasive esophagomyotomy for achalasia. METHODS: Symptomatology for achalasia was assessed in 22 pediatric patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagomyotomy for achalasia between 1995 and 2000. All patients were evaluated for duration of hospitalization, postoperative resumption of feeds, postoperative complications, and symptomatic relief. Participants were assigned pre-and postoperative symptom severity scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe). RESULTS: The median age of the 10 females and 12 males at time of surgery was 11.3 years +/- 3.4 (standard deviation). Transabdominal laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication was performed in 18 patients, and thoracoscopic esophagomyotomy without fundoplication was performed in 4. Two patients required conversion from transabdominal laparoscopic esophagomyotomy to open esophagomyotomy because of intraoperative esophageal perforation. The mean duration of postsurgical follow-up was 17 +/- 16 (standard deviation) months (range, 1-54 months). Mean duration of hospitalization (days +/- standard error or mean) was less for transabdominal laparoscopic esophagomyotomy than for converted open esophagomyotomy (2.7 +/- 0.3 vs. 9.0 +/- 3.0 days; P < 0.05) or for thoracoscopic esophagomyotomy (4.8 +/- 1.7 days; P = not significant). Mean time to resumption of soft feedings (days +/- standard error or mean) occurred sooner after transabdominal laparoscopic esophagomyotomy than after converted open esophagomyotomy (2.0 +/- 0.2 vs. 5.5 +/- 0.5 days; P < 0.001) or after thoracoscopic esophagomyotomy (4.0 +/- 1.3 days; P = not significant). Patients experienced significant pre-to postoperative improvement in mean severity score with regard to dysphagia (2.6 vs. 0.4; P < 0.001) and regurgitation (1.7 vs. 0.2; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive esophagomyotomy can provide excellent symptomatic relief from dysphagia and regurgitation for children with achalasia.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: state of the art.

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has become a routine procedure in pediatrics. It has been proven safe, highly informative and cost effective when used in the outpatient setting by experienced endoscopists. This review summarizes the experience in pediatric upper GI endoscopy over the last 30 years. It is focused on safety issues, indications, choice of sedation, techniques of the procedure itself as well as interpretation of endoscopic appearance of the most common diseases of the upper GI tract in children. Details of advanced procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), sclerotherapy and ligation of esophageal varices and foreign body removal are discussed as well.

Biopsy↗