PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G H Brandeis

Publications and source records attributed to G H Brandeis.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Are we improving the quality of nursing home care: the case of pressure ulcers.

BACKGROUND: There are widespread concerns regarding the quality of nursing home care and whether care is improving. We evaluated a large provider of nursing home care to determine whether risk-adjusted rates of pressure ulcer development have changed. METHODS: We used the Minimum Data Set to study National HealthCare Corporation nursing homes from 1991 through 1995. Rates of pressure ulcer development were calculated for successive 6-month periods by determining the proportion of residents initially ulcer-free having a stage 2 or larger pressure ulcer on subsequent assessments. Rates were risk-adjusted for patient characteristics. The proportion of new ulcers that were deep (stages 3 or 4) were also calculated. RESULTS: We examined risk-adjusted rates of pressure ulcer development based on 144,379 observations of 30,510 residents at 107 nursing homes. The number of observations per 6-month period ranged from 11,041 to 15,805. Between 1991 and 1995, there was a significant (P<.05) rate decline of more than 25%. Additionally, the proportion of new ulcers that were stages 3 or 4 declined from 30 to 22% (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Nursing homes showed significant improvement in the quality of pressure ulcer preventive care from 1991 to 1995.

Age Distribution↗

Nursing home characteristics and the development of pressure sores and disruptive behaviour.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how nursing home characteristics affect pressure sores and disruptive behaviour. METHOD: Residents (n = 5518, aged > or =60 years) were selected from 70 nursing homes in the National Health Care chain. Homes were classified as high- or low-risk based on incidence tertiles of pressure sores or disruptive behaviour (1989-90). Point-prevalence and cumulative incidence of pressure sores and disruptive behaviour were examined along with other functional and service variables. RESULTS: The overall incidence of pressure sores was 11.4% and the relative risk was 4.3 times greater in high- than low-risk homes; for disruptive behaviour, the incidence was 27% and the relative risk was 7.1 times greater in the high-risk group. At baseline, fewer subjects in homes with a high risk of pressure sores were white or in restraints, but more had received physician visits monthly and had had problems with transfers and eating. High-risk homes also had fewer beds and used less non-licensed nursing staff time. At follow-up (1987-90), 52% of homes in the low-risk group and 35% of those in the high-risk group had maintained their risk status; low-risk homes were more likely to have rehabilitation and maintenance activities. Having multiple clinical risk factors was associated with more pressure sores in high- (but not low-) risk homes, suggesting a care-burden threshold. By logistic regression, the best predictor of pressure sores was a home's prior (1987-88) incidence status. Interestingly, 67% of homes with a high risk of pressure sores were also high-risk for disruptive behaviour, while only 27% of homes with a low risk of pressure sores were high-risk for disruptive behaviour. A threshold effect was also observed between multiple risk factors and behaviour. More homes with a high risk of disruptive behaviour (68%) remained at risk over 4 years, and the best predictor of outcome was a home's previous morbidity level. CONCLUSION: Nursing-home characteristics may have a greater impact than clinical factors on pressure sores and disruptive behaviour in long-stay, institutionalized elders.

Aged↗

Mortality associated with an influenza outbreak on a dementia care unit.

The purpose of this study was to describe an episode of increased mortality, whose cause was initially unknown. This retrospective cohort investigation was conducted on a dementia special care unit of a Department of Veterans Affairs facility, with more than 75% of residents clinically diagnosed with dementia of the Alzheimer type. One hundred five residents residing in the facility during February 1995 were included as subjects. A cluster of deaths occurred, triggering the investigation. Ultimately, 21 deaths (three times greater than any previous month in the past 5 years) occurred during the 1-month period. Measures included the presence of clinical influenza-like illness based on signs, serology, and autopsy results. Of the 105 residents, 45 (42.8%) met the clinical definition for influenza-like illness. Eight autopsies were performed, and the causes of death consisting of bronchopneumonia in seven and aspiration pneumonia in one were compatible with influenza. There were no differences among those who died from those who lived with regards to age, race, gender, clinical influenza-like illness, vaccination status, diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, or duration of dementia (all p > or = 0.2). However, those who died were at a higher risk of dying due to a greater number of coexisting conditions (p < 0.01). Also, overall the groups differed in Mini-Mental State Examination and Bedford Alzheimer Nursing Scale scores with those who died being more impaired (p < 0.01). Thus, the presentation of influenza-like illness can be subtle in onset, underappreciated in this population, and not recognized until excess mortality, which affects the most frail, is noted. Care providers need to be vigilant during the winter months for the presence of influenza.

Aged↗

Reducing random variation in reported rates of pressure ulcer development.

OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated methods of reporting on rates of pressure ulcer development in long-term care to identify approaches that lead to more stable estimates of actual performance. METHODS: Performance measures for facilities that adequately adjust for both random variation and casemix should be relatively stable from one time period to the next. The authors calculated facility rates of pressure ulcer development over eight consecutive time periods and correlated measures over time using different reporting methods including z-scores, combining rates from several time periods, and limiting analyses to large facilities. Results were compared with a Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Observed facility rates of pressure ulcer development varied considerably over time. The average correlation coefficient across seven time comparisons for observed rates was 0.17. Reporting performance as a z-score or limiting the analyses to large facilities increased the correlation. Combining two time periods was effective only when used with one of these other approaches. The correlation coefficient based on a simulation using only large facilities was 0.51. CONCLUSIONS: Random variation affects reported rates of pressure ulcer development. Using only large facilities and combining two time periods limits the effects of random variation and results in more stable estimates of performance. When describing performance, management must consider tradeoffs between having more accurate data, the frequency with which data are provided, and whether it is given to all providers.

Bias↗

Effect of pressure ulcers on the survival of long-term care residents.

BACKGROUND: Past studies have emphasized that patients with pressure ulcers are at high risk of dying. However, it remains unclear whether this increased risk is related to the ulcer or to coexisting conditions. In this study we examined the independent effect of pressure ulcers on the survival of long-term care residents. METHODS: We evaluated all 19,981 long-term care residents institutionalized in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) long-term care facilities as of April 1, 1993. Baseline resident characteristics and survival status were obtained by merging data from five existing VA data bases. Survival experience over a 6-month period was described using a proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Pressure ulcers were present in 1,539 (7.7%) long-term care residents. Residents with pressure ulcers had a relative risk of 2.37 (95% CI = 2.13, 2.64) for dying as compared to those without ulcers. After adjusting for 16 other measures of clinical and functional status, the relative risk associated with pressure ulcers decreased to 1.45 (95% CI = 1.30, 1.65). No increased risk of death was noted for residents with deeper ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure ulcers are a significant marker for long-term care residents at risk of dying. After adjusting for clinical and functional status, however, the independent risk associated with pressure ulcers declines considerably. The fact that larger ulcers are not associated with greater risk suggests that other unmeasured clinical conditions may also be contributing to the increased mortality associated with pressure ulcers.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Predictors of pressure ulcer healing among long-term care residents.

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of pressure ulcer healing among long-term care residents. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) long-term care facilities. PARTICIPANTS: All long-term care residents with a pressure ulcer on April 1, 1993, who remained institutionalized as of October 1, 1993. Patients and pressure ulcer status were identified from the Patient Assessment File, a VA administrative database. MEASUREMENTS: Pressure ulcers were considered healed if patients were without an ulcer on October 1, 1993. Predictors of pressure ulcer healing were selected from among patient characteristics in the Patient Assessment File. RESULTS: Pressure ulcers were present in 7.7% of the long-term care residents institutionalized as of April 1, 1993. Among the 819 pressure ulcer patients remaining institutionalized as of October 1, 1993, ulcers had healed in 442 (54.0%). Seventy-two percent of patients with Stage 2 ulcers were ulcer-free at 6 months, compared with 45.2% of patients with Stage 3 ulcers and 30.6% of those with Stage 4 ulcers (P < .001). Significant (P < .05) independent predictors of healing included pressure ulcer size (Odds ratio (OR) = 5.2 for Stage 2 ulcers, OR = 1.5 for Stage 3 ulcers), older age (OR = 1.5), and receiving rehabilitation services (OR = 1.3 for each additional type of therapy). Both immobility (OR = .3) and incontinence (OR = .7) were associated with ulcers not healing. CONCLUSIONS: Most Stage 2 pressure ulcers, and many larger ulcers encountered in long-term care settings will heal. Baseline patient characteristics are important predictors of healing. Interventions may then be targeted at patients whose ulcers are unlikely to heal, and observed facility performance may be compared with expected outcomes.

Activities of Daily Living↗

The prevalence of potentially remediable urinary incontinence in frail older people: a study using the Minimum Data Set.

OBJECTIVES: To use the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to describe the frequency and correlates of potentially treatable causes of urinary incontinence among a representative sample of American nursing home residents. To describe current management practices of urinary incontinence in the same population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using the dataset that was part of the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) evaluation of the MDS. SETTING: 270 Medicaid-certified nursing homes in 10 states. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2014 nursing home residents 60 years or older (mean = 84.3 +/- 8.7), 75.5% women, 81.9% white, who lived in a nursing home during the fall of 1990 were randomly selected to sample a fixed number of residents for each facility based on facility size. MEASUREMENTS: Incontinence was defined as the presence of at least two episodes of urinary leakage per week in the previous 2 weeks. Management techniques (toileting, pads/briefs, catheters) were those listed in the MDS. Potentially remediable causes of urinary incontinence available in the MDS were: medications (antipsychotics, antidepressants, and antianxiety/hypnotics); congestive heart failure; diabetes mellitus; pedal edema; delirium; depression; and impairments in activities of daily living (ADLs) (transferring, locomotion, dressing, toileting; bedrails; trunk restraints; and chair restraints). RESULTS: Forty-nine percent of residents were incontinent. Of these, 84.0% were managed by pads/briefs, 38.7% by scheduled toileting, 3.5% by indwelling catheter, and 1.2% by external catheter. Of the potentially reversible causes, bivariate analysis revealed associations (P < .1) with use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antianxiety/hypnotics; delirium; bedrails; trunk restraints; chair restraints; and ADL impairment. Dementia was also associated with incontinence (P < .1). Multivariate analysis revealed that urinary incontinence was independently associated with impairment in ADLs (OR = 4.2; CI = 3.2,5.6), dementia (OR = 2.3;CI = 1.8,3.0), restraints-trunk (OR = 1.7; CI = 1.5,2.0), chair (OR = 1.4; CI = 1.2,1.6), bedrails (OR = 1.3; CI = 1.1,1.5), and use of antianxiety/hypnotic medications (OR = .7;CI = .5,1.0) (all P < .04). CONCLUSIONS: Current management practices for urinary incontinence are inconsistent with advocated guidelines. These data also confirm the association between incontinence and several potentially remediable conditions and suggest that, even in the nursing home setting, urinary incontinence may respond to efforts to improve conditions not directly related to bladder function. This study underscores the need to examine the impact on urinary incontinence of strategies to address such conditions.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Rating long-term care facilities on pressure ulcer development: importance of case-mix adjustment.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the importance of case-mix adjustment in interpreting differences in rates of pressure ulcer development in Department of Veterans Affairs long- term care facilities. DESIGN: A sample assembled from the Patient Assessment File, a Veterans Affairs administrative database, was used to derive predictors of pressure ulcer development; the resulting model was validated in a separate sample. Facility-level rates of pressure ulcer development, both unadjusted and adjusted for case mix using the predictive model, were compared. SETTING: Department of Veterans Affairs long-term care facilities. PATIENTS: The derivation sample consisted of 31 150 intermediate medicine and nursing home residents who were initially free of pressure ulcers and were institutionalized between October 1991 and April 1993. The validation sample consisted of 17 946 residents institutionalized from April 1993 to October 1993. MEASUREMENT: Development of a stage 2 or greater pressure ulcer. RESULTS: 11 factors predicted pressure ulcer development. Validated performance properties of the resulting model were good. Model-predicted rates of pressure ulcer development at individual long-term care facilities varied from 1.9% to 6.3%, and observed rates ranged from 0% to 10.9%. Case-mix-adjusted rates and ranks of facilities differed considerably from unadjusted ratings. For example, among five facilities that were identified as high outliers on the basis of unadjusted rates, two remained as outliers after adjustment for case mix. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term care facilities differ in case mix. Adjustments for case mix result in different judgments about facility performance and should be used when facility incidence rates are compared.

Aged↗

Evaluating a national assessment strategy for urinary incontinence in nursing home residents: reliability of the minimum data set and validity of the resident assessment protocol.

Evaluation of 1 million incontinent American nursing home residents is hampered by both failure to detect incontinence and logistical barriers to diagnostic testing. The nationally mandated Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Resident Assessment Protocol (RAP) were devised to address these deficiencies. Although both instruments are also used in at least 18 other countries, neither has been evaluated. Our goal was to determine the reliability of the MDS and the accuracy of the RAP in predicting the lower urinary tract cause of incontinence. We determined interrater reliability for the 13 MDS items related to urinary incontinence in 123 randomly selected residents of 13 nursing homes in 5 states; forms were completed blindly by 2 nurses from each facility who were trained for a day. The RAP was assessed in 102 representative institutionalized women by blinded evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy compared with the multichannel videourodynamic criterion standard. For the MDS, interrater reliability for incontinence of all grades was excellent (weighted kappa correlation coefficient = 0.90), although reliability was greater at the extremes of measurement than for incontinence of intermediate severity. With the exception of delirium, correlations for the 11 MDS items related to incontinence were 0.65-0.96; for 6 items, correlations were > or = 0.8. The diagnostic accuracy of the RAP, successfully administered to 80% of women, was 70%. The accuracy of the nearly identical algorithm that formed the basis for the RAP was 84%. Importantly, serious misclassifications were not observed for either the RAP or the algorithm. Although its definitions should be modified slightly, the MDS appears to be feasible and reliable when administered by trained staff. In women, the diagnostic accuracy and safety of the RAP are good-particularly when administered as instructed-but the original, sex-specific algorithm is preferable. Together, the MDS and modified RAP provide a useful, stepwise, and non-urodynamically based strategy to guide evaluation and therapy of incontinence in this setting.

Aged↗

Misdiagnosis of urinary incontinence in nursing home women: prevalence and a proposed solution.

Because of the high prevalence of detrusor hyperactivity with impaired contractility (DHIC) in incontinent institutionalized women, we postulated that: 1) single-channel cystometry, the most commonly used diagnostic test, would be inadequate when used alone but that 2) its accuracy could be greatly enhanced by combining it with a previously-performed stress test. To test the hypothesis, we used blinded comparison of a clinical stress test and single-channel cystometry with multichannel videourodynamic evaluation (criterion standard), a strategy designed a priori. Subjects were 97 incontinent women who were considered representative of incontinent nursing home women nationally. With cystometry alone, 9 of 37 women with DHIC (24%) were misdiagnosed as stress-incontinent vs. 1 of 25 with DH (P = .03). In each case, misdiagnosis was due to failure to recognize low-pressure involuntary bladder contractions. Combining cystometry with the stress test improved diagnostic accuracy markedly. Of the 77% of women in whom the results of both tests were congruent, all were correctly classified. When results of the two tests were discordant, neither was superior. Significantly, no woman with stress incontinence was missed by the two-test strategy, nor was anyone with detrusor hyperactivity misclassified. We conclude that in institutionalized elderly women, DHIC commonly mimics other types of urinary tract dysfunction. Thus, single-channel cystometry alone is an inadequate diagnostic test in this population. However, a strategy that combines cystometry with a clinical stress test can correctly classify the majority of such women and identify those in whom the diagnosis is less secure. Use of this simple strategy would facilitate correct diagnosis and initial treatment of most institutionalized women without referral, and also enrich the referred population with those most likely to benefit. Such an approach could significantly improve the approach to this costly and morbid condition.

Aged↗

Evaluating pressure ulcer occurrence in long-term care: pitfalls in interpreting administrative data.

Administrative databases for long-term care frequently collect information on fixed dates of the calendar year, rather than for entire episodes of care. Patients discharged or dying prior to an evaluation date are lost to follow-up. We used one such database, the VA Patient Assessment File, to examine pressure ulcer occurrence in long-term care. Clinical studies have established that most pressure ulcers develop during the first several weeks following admission. In these data, however, pressure ulcer development was less common in patients assessed within 2 months following admission, as compared to those examined at 3 to 6 months. This finding appears to be related to the selective discharge of patients, which makes these patient populations noncomparable. These results highlight that care must be exercised when interpreting results obtained from such administrative data.

Aged↗

A longitudinal study of risk factors associated with the formation of pressure ulcers in nursing homes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors associated with the formation of stage II-IV pressure ulcers in nursing homes. DESIGN: Since the incidence rate for pressure ulcer formation varies among nursing homes, the homes were divided into tertiles based on these rates. Pooled logistic regression was used to model which factors are associated with the formation of pressure ulcers in both high and low incidence homes. SETTING: 78 National HealthCorp nursing homes. SUBJECTS: We studied 4232 nursing home residents free of pressure ulcers on admission to a nursing facility and at 3-months follow-up. All remained in the home for at least 3 additional months to a maximum of 21 months. MEASUREMENTS: The effects of age, gender, race, antipsychotic drug use, urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, disorientation, ambulation, physical restraints, activities of daily living of bathing, feeding, or transferring, and nursing home bed size on the formation of a stage II-IV pressure ulcer while the subject was a resident in the nursing home were studied. MAIN RESULTS: Significant factors associated with the formation of pressure ulcers in high incidence homes (21-month incidence = 19.3%) were ambulation difficulty (OR = 3.3; CI = 2.0, 5.3), fecal incontinence (OR = 2.5; CI = 1.6, 4.0), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.7; CI = 1.2, 2.5), and difficulty feeding oneself (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.5, 3.3). In the low incidence homes (21-month incidence = 6.5%), significant factors associated with pressure ulcer incidence were ambulation difficulty (OR = 3.6; CI = 1.7, 7.4), difficulty feeding oneself (OR = 3.5; CI = 2.0, 6.3), and male gender (OR = 1.9; CI = 1.2, 3.6). CONCLUSIONS: Although low and high incidence homes share similar risk factors, such as ambulation and feeding activities of daily living, the main difference was that diabetes and fecal incontinence played a major role only in high risk homes, while male gender was an important discriminator only in low incidence homes. Yet, it is unclear if these factors explain the three-fold difference in the incidence rates for pressure ulcers in these facilities. Baseline or resident clinical characteristic differences of any one factor between the high and low incidence homes varied by no more than 5%. While we identified certain conditions which are associated with pressure ulcer formation, there may be unknown or unmeasured facility effects in addition to the characteristics of a given resident in a particular home.

Activities of Daily Living↗

The epidemiology and natural history of pressure ulcers in elderly nursing home residents.

We analyzed prospective data from 19,889 elderly residents of 51 nursing homes from 1984 to 1985 to determine the prevalence, incidence, and natural history of pressure ulcers. Among all residents admitted to nursing homes, 11.3% possessed a stage II through stage IV pressure ulcer. For those residents admitted to the nursing home without pressure ulcers during the study period, the 1-year incidence was 13.2%. This increased to 21.6% by 2 years of nursing home stay. People already residing in a nursing home at the start of the study had a 1-year incidence of 9.5%, which increased to 20.4% by 2 years. Pressure ulcers were associated with an increased rate of mortality, but not hospitalization. Longitudinal follow-up of residents with pressure ulcers demonstrated that a majority of their lesions were healed by 1 year. Most of the improvement occurred early in a person's nursing home stay. Although nursing home residents with pressure ulcers have a higher mortality, with good medical care pressure ulcers can be expected to heal.

Aged↗

Pressure ulcer development in the VA: characteristics of nursing homes providing best care.

This study identifies structural characteristics of VA nursing homes that are associated with the best patient outcomes. We evaluated risk-adjusted rates of pressure ulcer development in VA nursing homes and related these rates to facility size, staffing patterns, teaching nursing home status, and rural versus urban locale. Higher rates of pressure ulcer development were seen among urban teaching nursing homes and among nursing homes associated with both larger and smaller VA hospitals. Staffing patterns had a complex association with pressure ulcer development, and smaller nursing home staffs were not clearly associated with higher rates. For multivariate modeling, only hospital size and staffing remained significant independent predictors of pressure ulcer development. These results emphasize that while structural characteristics of VA nursing homes can provide insights about care, improving the quality of care in this setting will require a much greater understanding of how nursing homes are organized to meet patient needs.

Aged↗