Arbitration: how to use it in dentistry.
With the current backlog of court cases, many parties involved in business disputes are turning to arbitration to resolve problems. The process with its application to dentistry is defined.
Humans↗
Biomedical subjects
G H Friedman
Publications and source records attributed to G H Friedman.
Early and rapid prediction of patency of the infarct-related coronary artery by using left ventricular wall thickness as measured by two-dimensional echocardiography.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether echocardiography can distinguish between persistent coronary occlusion and reperfusion. BACKGROUND: There are no adequate clinical or noninvasive laboratory markers to accurately predict successful reperfusion in an acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: In a closed chest swine model, the effect of reperfusion on myocardial wall thickness was studied by comparing a 150-min total coronary artery occlusion (group 1) with 120 min of occlusion followed by 30 min of reperfusion (group 2) in the area of risk as measured by echocardiography. Wall thickness was measured at baseline and at 90 and 150 min. RESULTS: In group 1 (n = 4), there was no appreciable change in mean wall thickness from 90 min to 150 min of occlusion at either end-diastole or end-systole (0.54 +/- 0.02 to 0.52 +/- 0.03 cm, 0.55 +/- 0.03 to 0.54 +/- 0.03 cm, respectively; p = NS). In contrast, in group 2 (n = 6), an increase in mean wall thickness from 0.53 +/- 0.02 to 0.97 +/- 0.05 cm at end-diastole and from 0.56 +/- 0.04 to 1.04 +/- 0.07 cm at end-systole was found from 90 min of occlusion to 30 min of reperfusion (p < 0.001). Reperfusion resulted in an increase in wall thickness of 83 +/- 11% at end-diastole and 92 +/- 17% at end-systole. In contrast, persistent coronary occlusion showed minimal changes of -3.0 +/- 5% at end-diastole and -2.0 +/- 6% at end-systole. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the hypothesis that an increase in wall thickness can accurately distinguish between reperfusion and permanent coronary occlusion.
Animals↗
Bypass surgery for chronic stable angina: predictors of survival benefit and strategy for patient selection.
The variable mortality risk associated with chronic stable angina calls for careful selection of patients for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) if the aim of management is to prolong life. The randomized and observational studies done in the last 20 years have identified the variables relevant to patient selection and thus have provided a rational basis for such clinical decisions. These studies showed that the sicker the patient, as gauged by relevant measures of coronary disease and cardiovascular morbidity, the more likely it is that CABG will prolong life. A CABG-related improvement in survival is therefore more likely to occur the worse the left ventricular function; the greater the number of diseased vessels; the more proximal the location of coronary lesions (more muscle is threatened by such lesions); the greater the severity of the lesions as determined by angiography; the more severe the angina; the more easily provocable the ischemia or the more extreme the measures of ischemia; and, within limits, the older the patient. Greater survival gain after CABG also occurs in patients with peripheral vascular disease, in patients with baseline electrocardiographic ST-segment and T-wave changes, and probably in women. Thus, patients are likely to live longer after CABG if they have left main disease; three-vessel disease with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction less than 50%), class III or IV angina, provocable ischemia, or disease in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery; two-vessel disease with proximal left anterior descending artery involvement; and two-vessel disease with class III or IV angina as well as either severe left ventricular dysfunction alone or moderate left ventricular dysfunction together with at least one proximal lesion. When the decision of whether to do CABG is less clear-cut, the presence of peripheral vascular disease, female sex, baseline electrocardiographic ST-segment and T-wave changes, or older age (over 60 but under 80 years) should weigh in favor of doing CABG. In general, patients with single-vessel disease do not seem to derive survival benefit from CABG.
Angina Pectoris↗
Medical malpractice arbitration: time for a model act.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Malpractice↗