Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G H Kingsley.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To study the experiences and views of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on the quality of health care received in primary and secondary care. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with 26 individual patients with RA; these were stratified by sex, ethnicity and disease duration, based on the treated prevalence cohort of patients attending two outpatient clinics in South East England. RESULTS: Patients highlighted four main factors which influenced their attitude and approach towards hospital staff and the treatment offered: (i) their past experiences with the National Health Service (NHS), (ii) their own health beliefs, (iii) professional attitudes (e.g. listening to patients, receiving feedback on disease processes) and (iv) organizational aspects (e.g. good communication between health professionals) which would make their visits to the outpatient clinic easier. CONCLUSION: Most patients no longer see themselves as passive recipients of care. They appreciate acknowledgement from health care professionals of their contribution towards management of their own chronic illness, and welcome a more equal dialogue with health care staff. This is consistent with the emphasis of the Department of Health document on 'Supporting People with Long-term Conditions' such as RA.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review medical and surgical foot intervention studies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), focusing on clinical efficacy, study quality, and risk of harm. METHODS: We searched appropriate databases using a combination of the terms "rheumatoid arthritis" and "foot" against terms indicating treatment; we also hand-searched references. We selected articles in English (1968-2003) comprising randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), prospective observational studies, and large retrospective observational surgical studies (> 50 cases). RCT quality was examined using Jadad scoring; other designs were assessed qualitatively. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 33 of 894 identified studies, comprising 5 RCTs and 1 CCT (all nonsurgical), 15 prospective observational studies (8 nonsurgical, 7 surgical), and 12 large retrospective studies (all surgical). Functional, custom-designed and semirigid orthoses and extra-depth shoes were effective in single RCTs of variable quality; no comparative studies have been conducted. This finding was supported by a CCT and prospective observational studies. There was no evidence of harm. There were no controlled trials of surgery. Prospective observational studies suggest that forefoot arthroplasty and first metatarsophalangeal joint implants, but not plantar callous debridement, are effective. Comparative retrospective analyses suggest that some procedure variants may be better, and surgery may relieve pain better than orthoses. Infection was the main risk. CONCLUSION: RCT evidence shows that orthoses and special shoes are likely to be beneficial in patients with RA. The only evidence of benefit from surgery comes from observational studies, because no RCTs have been conducted. Further RCT evidence is needed, although well-designed observational studies may be helpful.
BACKGROUND: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), intramuscular (IM) pulsed depomedrone expedites an immediate response to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although IM depomedrone is also widely used to treat disease flares in patients treated with DMARDs, its effect on radiological progression has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits of 120 mg IM depomedrone versus placebo in patients with established RA whose disease was inadequately controlled by existing DMARDs. METHODS: In a 2 year prospective randomised controlled trial patients were assessed using the ILAR/WHO core dataset, disease activity score (DAS28), x ray examination of hands and feet scored by Larsen's method, and bone densitometry. RESULTS: 291 patients with RA were screened, 166 were eligible, and 91 consented and were randomised. Disease activity improved more rapidly in the steroid treated patients than with placebo, but after 6 months no difference remained. A small but significant reduction in erosive damage in the steroid group compared with placebo was also found. More adverse reactions occurred in the steroid treated group than in the placebo patients (55 v 42), especially those reactions traditionally related to steroids (16 v 2), including vertebral fracture, diabetes, and myocardial infarction. Hip bone density fell significantly in steroid treated but not placebo patients. CONCLUSIONS: IM depomedrone improved disease activity in the short term and produced a small reduction in bone erosion at the cost of a significant increase in adverse events. Despite the initial benefit of IM depomedrone, when patients respond suboptimally to a DMARD they should not be given long term additional steroids but should be treated with alternative or additional DMARDs.
OBJECTIVE: Trials of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) enrol active rheumatoid arthritis patients identified using standard criteria (three out of four of: >/=6 tender joints, >/=6 swollen joints, ESR >/= 28 mm/h, >/=45 min morning stiffness). Concern has been expressed about generalizability, as many patients in routine practice have less active disease. Furthermore, these criteria do not map onto standard disease activity and treatment response measures. We examined how many routine patients were sufficiently active to meet trial recruitment criteria and whether alternative definitions of active disease were more appropriate. METHODS: We studied 504 patients in a cross-sectional study, 156 in a longitudinal study and 94 starting new DMARDs or biologics. Patients were classified as 'trial active' (met entry criteria), in remission or 'intermediately active' (between the two). We also evaluated the effect of amendments to criteria. RESULTS: Cross-sectionally only 38% patients were 'trial active', but longitudinally 68% were 'trial active' at least once. Thus, many clinic patients do have disease activity below the level required for trial entry, but over time most reach eligibility levels. More (62%) of the cohort starting new treatment were 'trial active', suggesting that recruitment criteria relate to clinical decisions. Criteria omitting morning stiffness and a disease activity score (DAS28) >/=5.4 replicated the classification given by current criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Trial results can be generalized to routine practice because most clinic patients are 'trial active' when their therapy is changed and most become 'trial active' over time. As DAS-based criteria are simpler and relate directly to response measures, their use should be considered in future.
OBJECTIVES: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthropathy characterized by the association of arthritis with psoriasis. Many agents have been proposed for the treatment of PsA, but their use is based more on clinical experience than on sound scientific evidence. METHODS: We reviewed MedLine up to November 2002, searching for 'psoriatic arthritis', 'drug therapy, 'controlled trials' and 'outcomes' and all possible acronyms for these terms. All relevant papers were then examined in detail. RESULTS: PsA is a condition that runs a variable clinical course. Mild forms can usually be controlled by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Intra-articular glucocorticoid injections are indicated in patients with persistent mono- or oligoarthritis. Patients with severe and progressive articular disease not responsive to NSAIDs should be treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to prevent joint damage and disability. Currently, methotrexate and sulphasalazine are considered the DMARDs of choice, but the evidence for the use of methotrexate in PsA is still largely empirical, while the clinical benefit induced by sulphasalazine appears to be modest. Other DMARDs proposed for the treatment of PsA include cyclosporin, gold salts and, more recently, leflunomide. However, none of the DMARDs available to date are effective in the treatment of psoriatic pelvispondylitis; in addition, a number of patients with severe peripheral arthritis fail to respond to standard DMARDs. Recently, tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors have proved effective in many PsA patients with pelvispondylitis or recalcitrant peripheral synovitis. CONCLUSIONS: None of the current treatments for PsA is curative, but significant clinical amelioration can be achieved in the vast majority of patients. Identification and prompt treatment of patients with severe articular disease is crucial for the achievement of a satisfactory clinical response and the improvement of the long-term outcome.
OBJECTIVE: Previous randomized controlled trials for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with acid-soluble chicken and bovine type II collagen (CII) have produced conflicting results. This randomized, double-blind, controlled trial examined the therapeutic effect of bovine CII tablets in RA. METHODS: CII tablets were prepared by adsorption onto a lactose base. Patients with a duration of RA of > or = 2 years and who had failed treatment with at least 1 slow-acting drug were recruited, provided that they had active arthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.05 mg, 0.5 mg, or 5 mg of CII or placebo daily for 6 months. All slow-acting drugs were stopped at least 4 weeks before starting CII, although prednisolone was permitted at dosages < 10 mg/day. Clinical assessments were performed at screening and at 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were recruited. Initially, there were no significant differences in mean Disease Activity Scores between groups. At 24 weeks, there was a significant difference (P = 0.041, by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance); the major components of this difference were attributable to relatively large decreases in the 0.5 mg CII group (19% of initial values) and to minimal decreases in patients receiving placebo (3% of initial values). Twenty patients had American College of Rheumatology 20% responses; 11 of these were in the 0.5 mg CII group and 3 were in each of the other groups, a significant difference (chi2 = 14.6, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in any clinical measure between the placebo, 0.05 mg CII, and 5 mg CII groups. There were no side effects associated with CII treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 0.5 mg/day of bovine CII is well tolerated and produces small, but significant, disease improvement in RA. However, the therapeutic window is narrow. The difference between our results and those of other trials may relate to the dose, species, and formulation of the CII.
There are large differences in the antigenicity and biology of the ReA-associated bacteria. For induction of arthritis, the relevance seems to be only that antigenic material reaches the joint, alive or dead. If there is a common antigen, it has to be a highly conserved one. Bacterial hsp60 seems to be an immunodominant T cell antigen in ReA, but there must be other relevant antigens shared by these different bacteria. An ineffective immune response (for example, low production of TNFalpha) seems to contribute to the manifestations and course of ReA. Although arthritis can also occur in its absence, HLA-B27 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ReA and the other SpA. Current data suggest that B27 probably acts as an antigen-presenting molecule for a still-unknown arthritogenic molecule. Comparison of ReA with IBD-associated arthritis suggests that there might indeed be a common antigen shared by ReA-associated bacteria and bacteria of the gut flora. CD8+ T cells seem to be important in ReA and other SpA. In some parts of the world, such as in Mexico, ReA could be a major predisposing cause of the development of AS. Antibiotic treatment is not effective, probably because the triggering bacteria are already dead or in a partly latent state at the time arthritis occurs. Based on this knowledge and on new technologies, it should be possible in future years to derive answers to the questions about ReA and the other SpA and, as a consequence, to find a cure.
BACKGROUND: CD4(+) T cells are important mediators in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this open-label, dose-escalating study, we examined the pharmacokinetic (PK), clinical, biological and immunological effects of a humanized IgG1 anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb), 4162W94, in the peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) of RA patients. METHOD: Twenty-four patients in four cohorts (six patients in each cohort) were allocated to be treated with five consecutive daily doses of 4162W94 (10, 30, 100 or 300 mg i.v.). Disease activity was measured by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and disease activity score (DAS). We also measured 4162W94 concentration, the percentage of 4162W94-coated CD4(+) lymphocytes, percentage down-modulation of CD4, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) levels in the PB and SF. RESULTS: A direct relationship between 4162W94 dose, biological response and clinical outcome was seen. Treatment with 10 and 30 mg of 4162W94 for 5 consecutive days resulted in transient coating and down-modulation of CD4(+) lymphocytes, with little effect observed beyond the final dose. However, treatment with 100 and 300 mg resulted in sustained coating and/or down-modulation for 3 weeks and 4 weeks, respectively, in PB and >4 weeks in SF in one patient from the 300 mg cohort. There was a dose-related moderate but transient depression in the CD4(+) lymphocyte count in most patients, with all but three returning to >0.40 x 10(9)/l or >75% baseline by the end of the study period. Significant clinical improvement (ACR 20%) was seen in only 1/6 patients in each of the 10- and 30-mg cohorts; however, 3/6 and 5/5 patients in the 100 and 300-mg cohorts, respectively, were ACR 20% responders. In addition, there were significant reductions in PB acute phase reactants as well as SF IL-6 and TNFalpha concentrations in parallel to clinical improvement. CONCLUSION: Data from this pilot study suggest that 4162W94 is a clinically active novel immunotherapeutic agent that may suppress inflammation in RA.
OBJECTIVE: Bacteria have been implicated in the pathogenesis of many types of inflammatory arthritides. The aim of this study was to identify any bacterial DNA in synovial fluid (SF) from patients with a range of inflammatory arthritides. METHODS: A highly sensitive, broad-range, nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol targeting the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was designed and applied to SF from 65 patients with a range of rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: Bacterial DNA was detected in 26 SF samples, including eight from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and five with juvenile arthritides. PCR products were identified by sequencing and searching of bacterial genomic databases; 'best fits' included Haemophilus influenzae, Bordetella and Yersinia. CONCLUSIONS: These finding suggest an association between bacterial infection and inflammatory arthritides in some patients. Further research is required to determine the role of these organisms in the pathogenesis and whether such patients might respond to prolonged antibiotic therapy.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of an engineered human anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody, CDP571, on immune functions as well as bone and cartilage turnover in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a placebo controlled trial. We also assessed the effects of repeated treatment with CDP571 in an open label continuation study. METHOD: Thirty-six patients were treated with either placebo or 0.1, 1, or 10 mg/kg of CDP571 given as an intravenous infusion. The followup period was 8 weeks. Lymphocyte phenotype, soluble CD4 (sCD4), soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-6, and stromelysin levels in the blood were measured before and after treatment; bone and cartilage markers (pyridinoline, deoxypyridinoline, N-terminal telopeptide) were similarly assessed in the urine. Patients who completed a placebo controlled trial of CDP571 were offered further treatment with CDP571. They received a maximum of 2 further doses of 1 mg/kg (7 patients) or 10 mg/kg (9 patients) in an open study. RESULTS: Plasma IL-6 level was statistically significantly reduced in the 1 and 10 mg/kg groups. In the 10 mg/kg group, there were also reductions in plasma stromelysin and urine bone markers, although there was no change in sCD4 and sIL-2R levels. Repeat doses of CDP571 were well tolerated and continued to suppress the acute phase response and disease activity. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 10 mg/kg of CDP571 reduced IL-6 and surrogate markers of bone turnover in RA, suggesting that CDP571 might prevent joint damage in RA. Since there was no effect on lymphocyte markers despite the marked reduction in inflammation, CDP571 appears to have no effect on ongoing CD4 T cell activation.
OBJECTIVE: To resolve how frequently Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA are present in the joints of unselected patients with reactive arthritis (ReA) and undifferentiated oligoarthritis, and to determine if there is an accompanying serologic or cellular antichlamydial immune response. METHODS: Two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols to detect the plasmid of C. trachomatis and the outer membrane protein 1 gene of C. pneumoniae were developed for specific use with synovial fluid (SF). Subsequently, the assays were used to detect DNA from the 2 organisms in SF from 54 adult patients with rheumatic diseases, including 4 with sexually acquired ReA and 31 with undifferentiated oligoarthritis. The presence of chlamydial antibodies and SF lymphocyte proliferation responses were determined in parallel. RESULTS: The PCR protocols were species-specific and highly sensitive. SF samples from 15 patients (8 with undifferentiated oligoarthritis, 3 with ReA, 1 with rheumatoid arthritis, and 1 with psoriatic arthritis) were positive for C. trachomatis. There was no significant correlation between the presence of C. trachomatis DNA in the joint and a Chlamydia-specific synovial T cell response or a serologic response. C. pneumoniae was not detected in any of the 54 patients, although it was identified in the SF from a rheumatoid arthritis patient outside this study, demonstrating that the assay was capable of detecting the organism in the joint. CONCLUSION: C. trachomatis DNA was present in ReA patients and in nearly one-third of unselected patients with undifferentiated oligoarthritis, which further supports the hypothesis that it plays an important role in disease pathogenesis. However, its presence did not correlate with evidence of an antichlamydial immune response. Despite previous anecdotal reports, C. pneumoniae does not appear to be a major cause of undifferentiated oligoarthritis or ReA.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Monoclonal antibodies bind to their targets with high specificity and therefore have excellent potential as therapeutic agents. Biotechnological advances have allowed the production of large quantities of engineered monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic use. Recent research in rheumatoid arthritis has identified important mediators of synovitis. Monoclonal antibodies targeting these have been tested in clinical trials over the last decade. Anti-cytokine therapies, in particular anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibodies, suppressed inflammation and produced rapid symptomatic improvement. Anti-lymphocyte monoclonal antibodies produced long-lasting disease suppression in animal models of rheumatoid arthritis. The use of depleting anti-lymphocyte monoclonal antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis had been disappointing as they did not penetrate the synovial joint in sufficient quantity to suppress disease without producing severe and protracted peripheral blood lymphopenia. Consequently, their use in rheumatoid arthritis had been abandoned. In contrast, clinical trials of non-depleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis showed that they could suppress synovitis. However, it remains unclear whether they could lead to prolonged disease improvement.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effect of a daily dosing schedule of the chimeric anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (MAb), cM-T412, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and compared lymphocyte changes in the peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) of these patients. METHODS: Twelve patients received 50 mg/day of cM-T412 for 5 days, followed by a maintenance treatment of 50 mg/week for 5 weeks (6 patients), or a retreatment course of 50 mg/day for 5 days after 5 weeks (6 patients). Paired PB and SF samples were obtained during treatment for analysis. RESULTS: Changes in lymphocyte count and coating with the MAb in PB did not reflect changes in the SF. After 5 daily treatments, the percentage of cM-T412-coated CD4+ lymphocytes in SF correlated with the degree of clinical improvement seen in patients at 2 weeks after the initiation of therapy (r = 0.75, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the importance of antibody dosage and treatment regimen in determining clinical benefit. Our findings suggest that the percentage of cM-T412-coated CD4+ lymphocytes in SF may be a predictor of clinical outcome.
Reactive arthritis is triggered by an infection, either of the genitourinary or gastrointestinal tracts; the common triggering bacteria in enteric ReA include salmonella, shigella, yersinia, and campylobacter. It is still not clear how such different bacteria can lead to a similar clinical picture and have a similar association with the MHC class I antigen HLA-B27. Common both to enterogenic and urogenic bacteria is the type of peripheral joint involvement. However, this is not so different from other bacteria-associated arthritides and is probably the consequence of bacteria persistent inside the joint. What is unique to these bacteria is the HLA-B27-association and the nearly exclusively B27-linked clinical manifestations as sacroiliitis and iritis. Shigella-induced ReA has the highest B27-association while in salmonella- and chlamydia-induced ReA a lower association can be found. Mucosal entry of enterogenic bacteria give easy access to macrophages which might be important for the transport into the joint. Although bacteria-specific antibodies are of diagnostic value, the humoral immune response does not explain the immunopathogenesis and MHC-association of this disease. Bacteria-specific T-cells have been constantly found in the synovial fluid from ReA patients and have been further analysed. The identification of immunodominant antigens of these bacteria is of great importance to understand the pathogenesis. Although an antigen shared by all bacteria has not been identified until now progress is being made in this field. We have also to consider the possibility that these bacteria are not only driving the immune response themselves but rather work as a trigger for autoimmunity.
The objective was to elucidate the immunological abnormalities underlying polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM). The phenotype of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMNC) subsets and cell surface expression of activation (CD25 and HLA-DR) and adhesion (LFA-1) molecules was studied in 12 patients with PM and in 10 patients with DM. PBMNC subsets and expression of T-cell activation molecules were evaluated by cytofluorography. Double immunofluorescence and indirect immunoperoxidase techniques were applied to muscle biopsies to define T-cell phenotype and LFA-1/ICAM-1 expression. In PM, the absolute number of circulating cytotoxic (CD8+CD28+) T cells was selectively reduced. T cells showed increased expression of activation molecules, CD25 and HLA-DR, and increased adhesion capacity as the absolute numbers of CD3+CD25+, CD8+HLA-DR+, CD3+LFA-1+('bright') and CD8+ CD8+LFA-1+('bright') cells were higher than in healthy donors and DM patients. In PM muscle biopsies, T cells were mainly CD3+CD8+ and LFA-1+; additionally, endothelial cells and myofibres surrounded by T cells showed positive staining for ICAM-1. In DM, there was a general lymphopenia that led to a decreased absolute number of all T-lymphocyte subsets. It is proposed that in PM, in contrast to DM, LFA-1/ICAM-1 interactions enable activated CD8+ T cells to migrate selectively into the inflamed muscle and to adhere to myofibres, leading to tissue injury.