PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Heacock

Publications and source records attributed to G Heacock.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Effect of ablation profile on wound healing and visual performance 1 year after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

BACKGROUND: Early photorefractive keratectomy ablations were of limited diameter and depth to maintain the integrity of the globe and to minimise postoperative haze. This study evaluated the effects of deeper, larger diameter wounds on refractive stability and corneal haze, and investigated the effects of ablation profile on wound healing and visual performance. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing -3.00D and -6.00D corrections were randomised to receive 5 mm, 6 mm, or multizone treatments. The multizone treatment was 6 mm in diameter, but only the depth of the 5 mm treatment. Outcome was measured by Snellen visual acuity, residual refractive error, objective techniques for haze and halos, pupil diameter, subjective night vision, and requirement for retreatment. RESULTS: Overall, the results of 6 mm treatments were superior to those of 5 mm and multizone treatments: they had a smaller hyperopic shift (p < 0.01), a more predictable (p < 0.001) and stable refractive outcome, less haze (p < 0.05), smaller halos (p < 0.05), fewer subjective night vision problems, and fewer patients required retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of these data and a literature review of corneal wound healing demonstrated that the improved outcome associated with the 6 mm beam did not relate to the depth of ablation. The factor with greatest apparent influence on the development of haze and regression was the slope of the wound surface over the entire area of the ablation. Tapering the wound edge provided no additional benefit, and contributed to night vision problems. It is, therefore, recommended that small diameter or multizone treatments should not be used in low and moderate myopia.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

A slitlamp comparator system for macular photocoagulation.

A slitlamp comparator device has been developed to project the image of a 35mm angiogram frame into the field of view of a standard slitlamp during macular photocoagulation. The image may be varied in brightness, magnification, and position, and viewed either on a black background or superimposed on a slitlamp fundus image. The comparator is a useful alternative to conventional angiogram projection systems and suggests the utility of more sophisticated "heads-up" display devices.

Fluorescein Angiography↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparative study of the duration and efficacy of tetracaine 1% and bupivacaine 0.75% in controlling pain following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if topical bupivacaine 0.75% provides better pain control after excimer laser over topical tetracaine 1% without affecting corneal wound healing, refractive outcome of visual function. DESIGN: A prospective, double-masked trial was conducted in which 38 patients were randomized to receive either tetracaine or bupivacaine every 30 minutes for 24 hours post-operatively. Pain was recorded over a four day period using a Visual Analogue Pain Scale. The rate of epithelial healing was assessed during digitized retro-illumination photography. Visual performance was recorded using best corrected Snellen acuity, objective measurements of haze, halo and glare over a six month period. RESULTS: Tetracaine afforded better pain control (p = 0.05). Full epithelial closure occurred in all patients within 72 hours and no statistically significant difference was recorded in any of the parameters measured. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our expectation, the longer acting anaesthetic, bupivacaine, was inferior to tetracaine. Limited and supervised use of topical anaesthetics is recommended in controlling pain following photorefractive keratectomy.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of ablation diameter, depth, and edge contour on the outcome of photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of the ablation diameter, depth, and edge contour on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in which 60 patients (60 eyes) were randomly allocated to 5.00-mm, 6.00-mm, or 5.00 to 6.00-mm multizone treatment groups. All eyes underwent a -6.00 diopter (D) correction using a Summit Omnimed excimer laser. RESULTS: In eyes treated with 6.00-mm diameter zones, the initial hyperopic shift was reduced, with significant differences at 1 and 4 weeks (p < 0.01). At 6 and 12 months, the refractive changes were closer to the intended correction with 6.00-mm diameters. The predictability of PRK was improved with 6.00-mm zones, with a significant reduction in variance of the refractive changes, at all stages postoperatively (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). Objective measurements of haze were significantly less at 1, 3, and 6 months with 6.00-mm ablations (p < 0.05). There were no differences between the 5.00-mm and the 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone groups. Computerized measurements of "night" halo were significantly smaller in the 6.00-mm treatment group at 1 week and 1 month (p < 0.05). At 12 months, two patients treated with 5.00-mm zones and three with the 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone complained of severe night vision disturbances. No 6.00-mm eyes were similarly affected. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a 6.00-mm spherical ablation diameter produced less initial overcorrection, improved predictability, and was associated with a reduction in postoperative halos and night vision disturbances. Creating a superficial blend zone with a 5.00- to 6.00-mm multizone treatment had no beneficial effect on the outcome.

Adult↗