Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Hocman.
1. The defense of the organism against cancer by inhibitors of proteolytic enzymes which are able to block the metastasizing stage of the disease is reviewed. 2. The contemporary views on the possible mechanisms of the process of prevention on both molecular and cellular levels are presented.
Epidemic-like occurrence of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease was observed in 1987 in Slovakia (Orava). Search for the cause of CJD focus indicated a coincidence of genetic and environmental risks in clustering patients. Since Spongiform Encephalopathies might be transmitted orally, (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy), the possibility of zoonotic source of CJD cases in Orava was also considered. A deficient knowledge about the occurrence of scrapie in Slovakia stimulated an examination of sheep with signs of CNS disorders in two flocks of Valasky breed in Orava. In one flock, neurohistopathological examination revealed in sheep brains lesions characteristic for scrapie. Frozen brain tissue of these animals were used for the detection of scrapie associated fibrils. They were found in 2 animals from the same flock. This is the first laboratory confirmation of scrapie in Czecho-Slovakia. The possible epidemiological and economical implications are emphasized.
1. Results of epidemiological studies indicate that a human diet rich in vegetables may lower the incidence of cancer. 2. This preventive effect of the vegetable diet against cancer could be ascribed to lowered intake of energy (joules) and its content of vitamins and carotene. 3. The consumption of vegetables means also less meat and fats as well as increased fiber content and specific chemopreventive compounds (indoles, plant phenols) present in such a diet. 4. The supposed mechanisms of prevention may include enhanced enzymatic detoxification of harmful compounds, and inhibition of their binding to cellular DNA, their adsorption on fiber, detoxification of radical forms of carcinogens by natural antioxidants in plants and probably many other ways too.
1. The synthetic phenolic antioxidants (e.g. BHT, BHA) added to human and animal food are able to lengthen the life of organisms and lower the incidence of cancer caused by chemical compounds. 2. On the other hand they may not be rendered completely harmless since they can cause lung damage (BHT) or promote the action of some carcinogens (BHA). 3. They could act as compounds preventing cancer either via interception of harmful free radicals, activating the detoxifying enzymes of the body, inhibiting the formation of ultimately carcinogenic metabolites and their binding to DNA, and modifying the immune response of the organism. 4. Their action is influenced by their own chemical structure, the composition of carcinogen, the strain, sex and age of experimental animals, the tissue upon which they are supposed to act and the time of their administration in relation to the time of the carcinogen insult. 5. These compounds are concentrated in adipose tissue, liver and kidney. They are excreted within tens of hours mainly in urine. 6. The acceptable daily intake of BHA is at present considered to be 0.6 mg kg-1 body wt day-1. In spite of their possible tumor-promoting properties they could not be considered overtly toxic. Their pronounced chemoprotective role against some forms of chemical carcinogenesis deserves considerable attention.
1. Selenium intake (in the form of selenite, selenate, selenomethionine, etc.) protects the organism against the action of some kinds of carcinogens. 2. People and animals having less Se in their blood are at a higher risk of acquiring cancer than those whose blood contains more of this element. 3. This chemopreventive action is probably due to antioxidant properties of Se, its involvements in the enzyme glutathione peroxidase as well as in the inhibition of enzymes converting carcinogens to their ultimate forms in the cell. 4. An intake of 150-300 micrograms of Se daily is considered to be adequate to protect the human organism without exhibiting the toxic properties of this element.
1. The reduction of nutritional energy intake (joules) often reduces the incidence of both spontaneous and induced cancers in humans and experimental animals in an approximately dose-dependent manner. 2. To achieve the best preventive effect, the reduction of dietary intake should begin well before the carcinogen insult, should be intense enough (lowering the intake of joules by at least approx. 25-30%) and should last a long time, preferably even life-long. 3. This preventive effect depends upon the strain, sex and age of animals, the kind of carcinogenic insult and also the susceptibility of the target tissue. 4. The mechanism by which the dietary restriction may exert its protective action may involve changes in the hormonal equilibria, influences upon the immuno-surveillance, changes of activities of enzymes involved in carcinogen metabolism and other factors. 5. Since over-eating and the resulting obesity constitutes a pronounced risk factor for the incidence of cancer and other diseases, lowering the nutritional energy intake represents today the simplest, cheapest and most effective way to prevent cancer in the general population.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.