Cognitive and neuropsychiatric side effects of mefloquine.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antimalarials↗
Biomedical subjects
G I Keitner
Publications and source records attributed to G I Keitner.
Gender differences in chronic major and double depression.
BACKGROUND: While the sex difference in prevalence rates of unipolar depression is well established, few studies have examined gender differences in clinical features of depression. Even less is known about gender differences in chronic forms of depression. METHODS: 235 male and 400 female outpatients with DSM-III-R chronic major depression or double depression (i.e., major depression superimposed on dysthymia) were administered an extensive battery of clinician-rated and self-report measures. RESULTS: Women were less likely to be married and had a younger age at onset and greater family history of affective disorder compared to men. Symptom profile was similar in men and women, with the exception of more sleep changes, psychomotor retardation and anxiety/somatization in women. Women reported greater severity of illness and were more likely to have received previous treatment for depression with medications and/or psychotherapy. Greater functional impairment was noted by women in the area of marital adjustment, while men showed more work impairment. LIMITATIONS: Since our population consisted of patients enrolling in a clinical trial, study exclusion criteria may have affected gender-related differences found. CONCLUSIONS: Chronicity of depression appears to affect women more seriously than men, as manifested by an earlier age of onset, greater family history of affective disorders, greater symptom reporting, poorer social adjustment and poorer quality of life. These findings represent the largest study to date of gender differences in a population with chronic depressive conditions.
Adult↗
"Factor analyses of the family assessment device," by Ridenour, Daley, & Reich.
Ridenour, Daley, and Reich conducted a series of factor analyses using the correlational matrix of the subscale scores of the Family Assessment Device (FAD), published in Family Process, December, 1999. They conclude that "the FAD subscales be reorganized from their current seven-subscale format" (p. 507). We propose that this suggestion for reorganization is premature and based on the inappropriate application of an "internal consistency" model of scale construction to the FAD. We further suggest that the most important criteria regarding an assessment instrument are those of reliability, validity, and clinical utility. In the absence of this kind of data regarding alternative organizations of the FAD, we believe that the original subscales remain the best choice.
Factor Analysis, Statistical↗
Why fix what isn't broken? A rejoinder to Ridenour, Daley, & Reich.
Ridenour, Daley, & Reich (2000) suggest that the Family Assessment Device should be reorganized. We disagree and provide further reasons why such a reorganization is unwise.
Family↗
Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in chronic depression.
OBJECTIVE: The authors examined gender differences in treatment response to sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and to imipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant, in chronic depression. METHOD: A total of 235 male and 400 female outpatients with DSM-III-R chronic major depression or double depression (i.e., major depression superimposed on dysthymia) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with sertraline or with imipramine after placebo washout. RESULTS: Women were significantly more likely to show a favorable response to sertraline than to imipramine, and men were significantly more likely to show a favorable response to imipramine than to sertraline. Gender and type of medication were also significantly related to dropout rates; women who were taking imipramine and men who were taking sertraline were more likely to withdraw from the study. Gender differences in time to response were seen with imipramine, with women responding significantly more slowly than men. Comparison of treatment response rates by menopausal status showed that premenopausal women responded significantly better to sertraline than to imipramine and that postmenopausal women had similar rates of response to the two medications. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women with chronic depression show differential responsivity to and tolerability of SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants. The differing response rates between the drug classes in women was observed primarily in premenopausal women. Thus, female sex hormones may enhance response to SSRIs or inhibit response to tricyclics. Both gender and menopausal status should be considered when choosing an appropriate antidepressant for a depressed patient.
Adult↗
Personality and family functioning in families of depressed patients.
In this cross-sectional study, the authors attempted to identify correlates of family functioning in 86 couples with a depressed member during the acute phase of the patient's depression. Demographic variables, psychiatric status, and personality traits of both the patient and spouse were investigated as potential predictors of family functioning. Regression analyses indicated that lower levels of personality pathology in the patient, higher levels of patient conscientiousness, and less psychological distress in the spouse were associated with healthier family functioning. Future research implications and clinical importance of these findings are discussed.
Adaptation, Psychological↗
Combined treatment for patients with double depression.
BACKGROUND: Patients with double depression (major depression + dysthymia) have a particularly chronic course of illness, yet few studies have investigated treatments for these patients. METHODS: 26 inpatients with double depression were assigned to two types of treatment: (1) pharmacotherapy and (2) combined treatment (pharmacotherapy + cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy). Treatment began while the patients were in the hospital and continued for 20 weeks after discharge. Comprehensive assessments were conducted at the end of treatment as well as at 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments. RESULTS: The results indicated that double-depressed patients who received the combined treatment had significantly lower levels of depression and higher social functioning at the end of treatment. However, no significant differences between groups were found at the follow-up assessments. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the addition of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy may produce an improved short-term outcome for patients with double depression.
Adult↗
Lithium plus valproate as maintenance polypharmacy for patients with bipolar I disorder: a review.
Standard pharmacotherapy for the maintenance treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder consists of lithium, valproate, or carbamazepine. However, many patients fail to respond to monotherapy with any of these agents, and as a result, psychiatrists often resort to polypharmacy. Findings from some open-label trials and retrospective chart reviews suggest this approach may be useful, but in the few controlled trials that have been conducted, the results have been negative. One drug combination that warrants further study as maintenance therapy is lithium plus valproate. Each is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of acute mania, and lithium has demonstrated efficacy for maintenance treatment as well. Some preliminary evidence suggests that the combination can be effective for patients who do not respond to monotherapy, and it seems to be no more dangerous than monotherapy. Concomitant administration of lithium plus valproate does not significantly alter lithium pharmacokinetics, and statistically significant changes that arise in valproate pharmacokinetics are not clinically significant. Although it is not known whether the drugs interact to augment response, many of their effects in the central nervous system do differ, and there is no indication of pharmacodynamic interactions that oppose each other. Finally, some evidence suggests that lithium and valproate may differ with regard to clinical variables that predict response to treatment.
Antidepressive Agents↗
The treatment of chronic depression, part 3: psychosocial functioning before and after treatment with sertraline or imipramine.
BACKGROUND: Previous research has suggested that depressed patients, and particularly chronically depressed patients, have significant impairments in many areas of their lives. While previous studies suggested that these "psychosocial" impairments improve following pharmacologic treatment, no large scale definitive study using multiple measures of psychosocial functioning has been reported. METHOD: We assessed multiple domains of psychosocial functioning using interviewer-rated and self-report measures within the context of a 12-week acute treatment trial of sertraline and imipramine for patients with chronic depression (double depression and chronic major depression). We also compared the psychosocial functioning data of this sample before and after treatment with normative data available from published community samples. RESULTS: Chronically depressed patients manifested severe impairments in psychosocial functioning at baseline. After treatment with sertraline or imipramine, psychosocial functioning improved significantly. Significant improvements appeared relatively early in treatment (week 4). Despite these highly significant improvements in functioning during acute treatment, the study sample as a whole did not achieve levels of psychosocial functioning comparable to a comparator nondepressed community sample. However, patients who reached full symptomatic response (remission) during acute treatment did have levels of psychosocial functioning in most areas at endpoint that approached or equaled those of community samples. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that successful antidepressant treatment with sertraline or imipramine can alleviate the severe psychosocial impairments found in chronic depression.
Adaptation, Psychological↗
Psychosocial factors and the long-term course of major depression.
Fifty-nine subjects participated in a telephone follow-up interview 6 years after being hospitalized with a severe major depressive episode and 5 years after completing a 12 month follow-up study. Patient information was used to provide a rating of symptom-free (n = 19), episodic (n = 30), or chronic (n = 10) that described each patient's long-term course of illness. Few variables from the acute stage were related to long-term course of illness; however, early patterns of global and family functioning, number of life events, and rapid reduction in depressive symptomatology were found to be of prognostic significance. For patients whose depression is severe enough to warrant hospitalization, the pattern of functioning in the first few months after discharge from hospital is a strong indicator of the future long-term course.
Adult↗
Family functioning and mental illness: a comparison of psychiatric and nonclinical families.
The primary objective of the present investigation was to examine adaptive functioning in the families of patients with a wide range of psychiatric disorders. Seven dimensions of family functioning, as measured by the Family Assessment Device (FAD), were compared across families of patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (n = 61), bipolar disorder (n = 60), major depression (n = 111), anxiety disorder (n = 15), eating disorder (n = 26), substance abuse disorder (n = 48), and adjustment disorder (n = 46). Families in each psychiatric group were also compared to a control group of nonclinical families (N = 353). Results indicated that regardless of specific diagnosis, having a family member in an acute phase of a psychiatric illness was a risk factor for poor family functioning compared to the functioning of control families. However, with few exceptions, the type of the patient's psychiatric illness did not predict significant differences in family functioning. Thus, having a family member with a psychiatric illness is a general stressor for families, and family interventions should be considered for most patients who require a psychiatric hospitalization for either the onset of, or an acute exacerbation of, any psychiatric disorder.
Adaptation, Psychological↗
A pilot study of lithium carbonate plus divalproex sodium for the continuation and maintenance treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder.
BACKGROUND: This pilot study compared the efficacy of lithium plus divalproex sodium with the efficacy of lithium alone for the continuation and maintenance treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder. METHOD: Twelve patients with bipolar I disorder as defined by the DSM-III-R were recruited and followed prospectively for up to 1 year. Each subject received lithium at serum levels of 0.8 to 1.0 mmol/L and a management/education session weekly or every 2 weeks. By random assignment, subjects received either divalproex sodium or placebo in conjunction with lithium. Divalproex sodium was adjusted to achieve a serum concentration of 50 to 125 micrograms/mL. Adjunctive medications were used on an as needed basis to treat psychosis, depression, and anxiety. The course of illness was monitored through use of the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Examination. RESULTS: Subjects treated with the combination of lithium and divalproex were significantly less likely to suffer a relapse or recurrence (p = .014), but were significantly more likely to suffer at least one moderate or severe adverse side effect (p = .041). There was no significant difference between groups in the use of adjunctive medication. CONCLUSION: These results provide preliminary evidence of the risks and benefits of combining lithium with divalproex sodium for the continuation and maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder.
Adult↗
Social-vocational adjustment in unipolar mood disorders: results of the DSM-IV field trial.
430 patients participating in the DSM-IV field trial receiving a DSM-III-R SCID-derived diagnosis of episodic major depression (n = 131), dysthymic disorder (n = 37) and double depression (n = 262) completed the social adjustment scale-self-report (Weissman and Bothwell, 1976). Patients with double depression demonstrated greater social morbidity than those suffering from episodic major depression or dysthymic disorder (P < 0.05). Significant predictors of high social morbidity in double depressives included severity of symptoms (P < 0.0001), followed by age of onset of first major depression (P < 0.04). Subscale analysis revealed that double depressives were significantly more impaired in work outside the home and in terms of their financial status (P < 0.05).
Adult↗
Combined medication and psychotherapy in the treatment of chronic mood disorders.
This article discusses the use of combined treatments for patients with chronic mood disorders. Although very little research concerning the efficacy of combined treatments for patients with chronic depression exists, clinical experience and limited available research suggest that combined treatment may be the most effective treatment option available for this population. The use of combination treatment involving pharmacotherapy, individual psychotherapy, and marital/family therapy is recommended to address the complex biopsychosocial issues involved in chronic mood disorders. Other theoretical and pragmatic issues concerning the delivery of combined treatment also are discussed.
Adult↗
Polypharmacy in bipolar I disorder.
There are currently three mood stabilizers available for the maintenance treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder: lithium, valproate, and carbamazepine. Unfortunately, monotherapy with each of these conventional agents often fails. To improve outcome, clinicians utilize polypharmacy. Although the efficacy of this practice is largely unknown, because of the lack of controlled studies, data from the United States and Europe indicate polypharmacy is the rule rather than the exception. The few controlled trials that have been conducted indicate that (1) the specific combination of lithium plus imipramine provides no advantage over lithium monotherapy (notwithstanding the inadequacy of lithium monotherapy); (2) the specific combination of lithium and the depot neuroleptic flupenthixol provides no advantage over lithium monotherapy; and (3) the combination of lithium plus carbamazepine may be as effective as lithium plus haloperidol for acute and continuation treatment. Most of the literature on polypharmacy consists of case reports, retrospective chart reviews, and open-label prospective studies, and describes the use of numerous combinations of medications, including lithium plus valproate, lithium plus carbamazepine, and valproate plus carbamazepine. Preliminary findings suggest these combinations may be effective, and that clozapine and high-dose levothyroxine may each be useful as well when combined with other drugs. Further research is necessary to formally evaluate whether these drug combinations are more effective than monotherapy. Until such studies are completed, certain general principles regarding side effects, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics should be kept in mind when prescribing two or more medications concurrently.
Bipolar Disorder↗
Childhood abuse and recovery from major depression.
Thirty-eight female inpatients with major depression were assessed for childhood abuse. History of abuse was examined in relation to recovery from a major depressive episode over a 12-month follow-up period. Forty-six percent of the women had a history of childhood abuse. Women without a history of abuse were 3.7 times more likely to have recovered by 12 months.
Adolescent↗
Results of the DSM-IV mood disorders field trial.
OBJECTIVE: The DSM-IV mood disorders field trial, a multisite collaborative study, was designed to explore the reliability of a course-based diagnostic classification system for major depression, evaluate the symptom criteria for dysthymia, and explore the need for additional diagnostic categories for milder forms of mood disorder (e.g., minor and recurrent brief depression). METHOD: Five hundred twenty-four depressed subjects were recruited from inpatient, outpatient, and community settings at five sites and evaluated with structured interviews according to DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria, with careful attention to longitudinal course. Within- and across-site interrater reliability studies and 6-month test-retest reliability studies were also conducted on subsets of the sample. RESULTS: For evaluations of major depression and dysthymia, intrasite reliability was good to excellent and intersite reliability was fair to good; 6-month test-retest reliability was fair for dysthymia and poor to fair for major depression. Interrater reliability for six course of illness specifiers was fair to good, and almost all subjects could be assigned to a specific type of course. CONCLUSIONS: The results supported the use of a course-based classification system for major depression. They also suggested that the content validity of the DSM-III-R symptom criteria for dysthymia could be improved by emphasizing cognitive and social/motivational symptoms, although such changes are unlikely to sharpen the distinction between dysthymia and major depression. Finally, 91% of the subjects met the criteria for current or lifetime major depression or dysthymia, suggesting that additional categories for milder forms of depression are not needed.
Adult↗
Role of the family in recovery and major depression.
OBJECTIVE: Major depression is significantly influenced by the family environment of the depressed patient. In order to explore how family functioning relates to this illness, the authors examined changes in family functioning over a 1-year course of major depression. METHOD: Subjective (Family Assessment Device) and objective (McMaster Clinical Rating Scale) assessments of family functioning were collected at hospitalization and 6 and 12 months after discharge for 45 inpatients diagnosed with major depression and their family members. Patterns of family functioning were examined by subjective and objective perspectives, initial levels of functioning, and reports of patients and other family members. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of families with a depressed member perceived their own family functioning as unhealthy; clinicians rated 70% of the families as unhealthy. While family functioning improved significantly from hospitalization through 12 months after discharge, the improvement was not uniform across all areas of functioning. Further, patients with good family functioning at hospitalization generally maintained their healthy functioning and were more likely to recover by 12 months than patients with poor family functioning. Although steady improvement in family functioning characterized the subjective ratings, objective assessments of family functioning suggested initial improvement followed by a decline from month 6 to month 12. CONCLUSIONS: Results show a clear association between family functioning and recovery from major depression. Different aspects of family life respond differently to the depressive illness; no one family dimension was uniquely related to outcome.
Adolescent↗