PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Irvin

Publications and source records attributed to G Irvin.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

OBJECTIVE: To provide reliable risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality rates after major surgery to the 123 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) performing major surgery, and to use risk-adjusted outcomes in the monitoring and improvement of the quality of surgical care to all veterans. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Outcome-based comparative measures of the quality of surgical care among surgical services and surgical subspecialties have been elusive. METHODS: This study included prospective assessment of presurgical risk factors, process of care during surgery, and outcomes 30 days after surgery on veterans undergoing major surgery in 123 medical centers; development of multivariable risk-adjustment models; identification of high and low outlier facilities by observed-to-expected outcome ratios; and generation of annual reports of comparative outcomes to all surgical services in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). RESULTS: The National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data base includes 417,944 major surgical procedures performed between October 1, 1991, and September 30, 1997. In FY97, 11 VAMCs were low outliers for risk-adjusted observed-to-expected mortality ratios; 13 VAMCs were high outliers for risk-adjusted observed-to-expected mortality ratios. Identification of high and low outliers by unadjusted mortality rates would have ascribed an outlier status incorrectly to 25 of 39 hospitals, an error rate of 64%. Since 1994, the 30-day mortality and morbidity rates for major surgery have fallen 9% and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable, valid information on patient presurgical risk factors, process of care during surgery, and 30-day morbidity and mortality rates is available for all major surgical procedures in the 123 VAMCs performing surgery in the VHA. With this information, the VHA has established the first prospective outcome-based program for comparative assessment and enhancement of the quality of surgical care among multiple institutions for several surgical subspecialties. Key features to the success of the NSQIP are the support of the surgeons who practice in the VHA, consistent clinical definitions and data collection by dedicated nurses, a uniform nationwide informatics system, and the support of VHA administration and managerial staff.

Hospitals, Veterans↗
PubMed1998

Thieves you trust.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dental Staff↗
PubMed1997

Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study.

BACKGROUND: The National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study was designed to collect reliable, valid data on patient risk and outcomes for major surgery in the Veterans Health Administration and to report comparative risk-adjusted postoperative mortality rates for surgical services in Veterans Health Administration. STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study was conducted in 44 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Included were 87,078 major noncardiac operations performed under general, spinal, or epidural anesthesia between October 1, 1991, and December 31, 1993. The main outcomes measure was all-cause mortality within 30 days after the index procedure. Multivariable logistic regression risk-adjustment models for all operations and for eight surgical subspecialties were developed. Risk-adjusted surgical mortality rates were expressed as observed-to-expected ratios and were compared with unadjusted 30-day postoperative mortality rates. RESULTS: Patient risk factors predictive of postoperative mortality included serum albumin level, American Society of Anesthesia class, emergency operation, and 31 additional preoperative variables. Considerable variability in unadjusted mortality rates for all operations was observed across the 44 hospitals (1.2-5.4%). After risk adjustment, observed-to-expected ratios ranged from 0.49 to 1.53. Rank order correlation of the hospitals by unadjusted and risk-adjusted mortality rates for all operations was 0.64. Ninety-three percent of the hospitals changed rank after risk adjustment, 50% by more than 5 and 25% by more than 10. CONCLUSIONS: The Department of Veterans Affairs has successfully implemented a system for the prospective collection and comparative reporting of risk-adjusted postoperative mortality rates after major noncardiac operations. Risk adjustment had an appreciable impact on the rank ordering of the hospitals and provided a means for monitoring and potentially improving the quality of surgical care.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed1997

Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study.

BACKGROUND: The National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study was designed to collect reliable, valid data on patient risk and outcomes for major surgery in the Veterans Health Administration and to report comparative risk-adjusted postoperative mortality and morbidity rates for surgical services in the Veterans Health Administration. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cohort study conducted at 44 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers closely affiliated with university medical centers. Included were 87,078 major noncardiac operations performed under general, spinal, or epidural anesthesia between October 1, 1991, and December 31, 1993. The main outcomes measures in this report are 21 postoperative adverse events (morbidities) occurring within 30 days after the index procedure. Multivariable logistic regression risk-adjustment models for all operations and for eight surgical subspecialties were developed. RESULTS: Patient risk factors predictive of postoperative morbidity included serum albumin level, American Society of Anesthesia class, the complexity of the operation, and 17 other preoperative risk variables. Wide variation in the unadjusted rates of one or more postoperative morbidities for all operations was observed across the 44 hospitals (7.4-28.4%). Risk-adjusted observed-to-expected ratios ranged from 0.49 to 1.46. The Spearman rank order correlation between the ranking of the hospitals based on unadjusted morbidity rates and risk-adjusted observed-to-expected ratios for all operations was 0.87. There was little or no correlation between the rank order of the hospitals by risk-adjusted morbidity and risk-adjusted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The Department of Veterans Affairs has successfully implemented a system for the prospective collection and comparative reporting of postoperative mortality and morbidity rates after major noncardiac operations. Risk adjustment had only a modest effect on the rank order of the hospitals.

Female↗
PubMed1995

The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care.

BACKGROUND: The use of surgical outcome in the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care is predicted on the development of proper models that adjust for the severity of the preoperative risk factors of the patient. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study was designed to collect reliable, valid data about patient risk and outcome for major surgery in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and to report comparative risk-adjusted surgical morbidity and mortality rates for surgical services in VHA. This study describes the rationale and methods used in the Risk Study and reports on the frequency distribution of the data elements that will be used in the development of risk-adjusted reporting of surgical outcome. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a prospective observational study in which dedicated nurses collected preoperative, intraoperative, and outcome data on patients undergoing noncardiac operations using general, spinal, and epidural anesthesia in 44 Veterans Administration Medical Centers. Outcome measures included all cause mortality within the 30 days after the index procedure and 21 major morbidities. RESULTS: Eighty-three thousand nine hundred fifty-eight cases meeting inclusion criteria were entered in the study between October 1, 1991 and December 31, 1993. Ninety-seven percent of patients were men, with a mean age of 60.1 +/- 13.6 (standard deviation) years. The most common preoperative risk factors were smoking (40.7 percent) and hypertension (36.1 percent). Of the patients, 84.6 percent had one or more risk factors. The most common procedures were transurethral resection of the prostate gland (6.7 percent), total knee replacement (3.1 percent), thromboendarterectomy (2.4 percent), partial colectomy (2.2 percent), and total hip replacement (2 percent). The unadjusted mortality rate was 3.1 percent at 30 days. The most common postoperative morbidities were pneumonia (3.6 percent), urinary tract infection (3.5 percent), and failure to wean from the ventilator at 48 hours postoperatively (3.2 percent). Seventeen percent of the patients have one or more major complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Veterans Health Administration has successfully implemented an outcome reporting system for major surgery that prospectively collects patient risk and outcome information reliably and validly. Risk adjustment models and comparative hospital-specific rates of risk-adjusted outcomes are currently being developed.

Aged↗
PubMed1983

Efficacy of oral and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal operations.

A cooperative Veterans Administration study of the septic complication rate during large-bowel surgery was undertaken in two groups of patients. The first group received oral neomycin and erythromycin base plus parenteral placebo; the second, the oral antibiotics plus parenteral cephalothin sodium. During a five-year period, 1,128 patients were studied. The overall septic complication rate was 7.8% in patients receiving only oral antibiotics, and 5.7% in patients receiving both oral and parenteral antibiotics. This difference was not significant. The only significant finding was a greater incidence of fever of unknown origin in patients receiving only oral antibiotics. None of those patients were treated with additional antibiotics, and all fevers cleared spontaneously. There seems to be no discernible benefit from adding parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis when performing elective colon surgery if appropriate mechanical cleansing and oral neomycin and erythromycin therapy are employed.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1976

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography utilizing the Chiba University needle.

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with the Chiba University needle has been performed in 42 patients with cholestasis. The examination was successful in 100% of patients with dilated intrahepatic bile ducts and in 89% of those with normal-size ducts. Complications were minimal. The results of this study suggest that PTC with the Chiba needle is superior to the current conventional methods. The patients with intrahepatic cholestasis, which often simulates extrahepatic biliary obstruction, were spared an unnecessary laparotomy.

Cholangiography↗