PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G J Anthone

Publications and source records attributed to G J Anthone.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Direct proabsorptive effect of octreotide on ionic transport in the small intestine.

Somatostatin is widely distributed within the nervous system and the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal actions of somatostatin include inhibition of hormone release, reduction of pancreatic secretion, inhibition of motility, and reduction of blood flow. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of somatostatin and its analogue octreotide on water and electrolyte transport in the small intestine. Rabbit ileal segments (n = 17) were harvested and arterially perfused ex vivo with a nonrecirculating oxygenated sanguineous solution. The lumen was perfused with an isotonic solution containing carbon 14-labeled polyethylene glycol. Net fluxes of water, Na+, and Cl- were calculated for three 20-minute periods designated basal, drug infusion, and recovery. Three groups were studied: somatostatin at 10(-6) mol/L (n = 5), somatostatin at 10(-5) mol/L (n = 5), and octreotide at 10(-5) mol/L (n = 7). Somatostatin at 10(-5) mol/L yielded a proabsorptive effect on the flux of water and electrolytes. Octreotide at 10(-5) mol/L caused a significant (p less than 0.05) proabsorptive response in the fluxes of water, sodium, and chloride during the period of drug infusion, which returned to basal secretory levels during the recovery period. This proabsorptive effect occurred without alterations in vascular resistance and necessarily was independent of systemic hormone interaction, supporting a direct effect of octreotide on intestinal ionic transport.

Absorption↗

Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies.

Recent findings in a small number of studies have suggested a trend toward increased infectious complications following laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of the present review was to evaluate the incidence of postappendectomy intra-abdominal abscess formation following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. Using the surgical database of the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, we reviewed the records of all appendectomies performed at the center between March 1993 and September 1995. Incidental appendectomies as well as appendectomies in pediatric patients under the age of 18 years were excluded. A total of 2497 appendectomies were identified; indications for these procedures included acute appendicitis in 1422 cases (57%), gangrenous appendicitis in 289 (12%), and perforated appendicitis in 786 (31%). The intraoperative diagnosis made by the surgeon was used for classification. A two-tailed P value of <0.05 was considered significant. There was no significant difference in the rate of abscess formation between the groups undergoing open and laparoscopic appendectomies for acute and gangrenous appendicitis. In patients with perforated appendicitis, a total of 26 postappendectomy intra-abdominal abscesses occurred following 786 appendectomies for an overall abscess formation rate of 3.3%. Eighteen abscesses occurred following 683 open appendectomies (2.6%), six abscesses occurred following 67 laparoscopic appendectomies (9.0%), and the remaining two abscesses occurred following 36 converted cases (5.6%). For perforated appendicitis, however, there was a statistically significant increase in the rate of abscess formation following laparoscopic appendectomy compared to conventional open appendectomy (9.0% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.015). There was no significant difference in the rate of abscess formation between open vs. converted cases or between laparoscopic vs. converted cases. A comparison of the length of the postoperative hospital stay showed no significant difference between open and laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis (6.1 days vs. 5.9 days). Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis is associated with a higher rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess formation without the benefit of a shortened hospital stay. Given these findings, laparoscopic appendectomy is not recommended in patients with perforated appendicitis.

Abdominal Abscess↗