Biomedical subjects

G J Peters

Publications and source records attributed to G J Peters.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

Decreased resistance to gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycitidine) of cytosine arabinoside-resistant myeloblastic murine and rat leukemia cell lines: role of altered activity and substrate specificity of deoxycytidine kinase.

We determined the potential activity of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine, dFdC) in 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytidine (ara-C)-sensitive and-resistant leukemia cell lines. Both drugs are phosphorylated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK); the triphosphates, dFdCTP and ara-CTP, respectively, are incorporated into DNA. In the murine leukemia cell line L1210, induction of resistance to ara-C resulted in the 2200-fold resistant subline L4A6. The Brown Norway rat myelocytic leukemia ara-C-sensitive cell line (BCLO) was >300-fold more sensitive to ara-C than its variant Bara-C. In L1210 cells, gemcitabine was 8-fold more active than ara-C; in L4A6, BCLO, and Bara-C cells, gemcitabine was 16-, 28-, and more than 3-fold more active than ara-C, respectively. A partial explanation for these differences may be the higher dCK activity in the parental cell lines L1210 and BCLO with gemcitabine compared to ara-C as a substrate. DCK activity was not or hardly detectable in the resistant L4A6 and Bara-C cell. In the rat leukemia cell lines, deoxycytidine (dCyd) phosphorylation activity showed an aberrant pattern, since the activity with dCyd was 1.5-fold higher in the Bara-C cell line compared with BCLO, possibly due to thymidine kinase 2. The wild-type L1210 cells accumulated at least 3-fold more ara-CTP and dFdCTP than the rat leukemia cell line BCLO. The ara-C-resistant variants L4A6 and Bara-C did not accumulate dFdCTP or ara-CTP. In conclusion, gemcitabine was more active than ara-C in all leukemia cell lines tested. The sensitivity of the wild-type cell lines correlates with the accumulation of dFdCTP and ara-CTP, but is independent of dCK. However, both resistant variants had decreased dCK activities, but were relatively more sensitive to dFdC than to ara-C.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Differential methotrexate resistance in childhood T- versus common/preB-acute lymphoblastic leukemia can be measured by an in situ thymidylate synthase inhibition assay, but not by the MTT assay.

Methotrexate (MTX) is not cytotoxic to patient-derived acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells in total-cell-kill assays, such as the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, putatively due to the rescue effects of hypoxanthine and thymidine released from dying cells. This was mimicked by a diminished methotrexate (MTX) cytotoxicity for the cell lines HL60 and U937 in the presence of hypoxanthine, thymidine, or lysed ALL cells. However, enzymatic depletion or inhibition of nucleoside membrane transport did not result in MTX dose-dependent cytotoxicity in patient samples. Alternatively, a thymidylate synthase inhibition assay (TSIA), based on inhibition of the TS-catalyzed conversion of 3H-dUMP to dTMP and 3H2O, correlated with the MTT assay for antifolate sensitivity in four human leukemia cell lines with different modes of MTX resistance. For 86 ALL patient samples, TSI50 values after 21 hours exposure to MTX were not different between T- and c/preB-ALL (P =.46). After 3 hours incubation with MTX followed by an 18-hour drug-free period, T-ALL samples were 3.4-fold more resistant to MTX compared with c/preB-ALL samples (P =.001) reflecting the clinical differences in MTX sensitivity. TSI50 values correlated with MTX accumulation (r = -.58, P <.001). In conclusion, the TSIA, but not the MTT assay, can measure dose-response curves for MTX in patient-derived ALL cells and showed relative MTX resistance in T-ALL compared with c/preB-ALL.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

5-ethyl-2'-deoxyuridine, a modulator of both antitumour action and pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil.

The aim of the present studies was to elucidate the effects and optimal modulatory conditions of 5-ethyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EtdUrd) on the antitumour efficacy, pharmacokinetics and catabolism of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on Colon-26 and Colon-38 murine tumours. HPLC and GC-MS techniques were used to measure the concentrations of 5-FU, dihydro-5-fluorouracil, EtdUrd, 5-ethyluracil and uridine in the plasma and that of 5-FU and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine monophosphate (FdUMP) in the tumours. It was shown that EtdUrd, given 1 h before 5-FU, selectively enhanced the antitumour action of 5-FU, without significantly increasing its toxic side-effects, thus resulting in an approximately three times higher therapeutic index. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that 1 h after 400 mg/kg EtdUrd administration - i.e. at the time of 5-FU treatment - the plasma concentration of EtdUrd was 269 microM, and that of 5-ethyluracil, as the major metabolite of EtdUrd, was 421 microM. It is of interest that EtdUrd pretreatment did not change the maximal plasma concentration of 5-FU; however, the half-life of the terminal elimination increased from 114.5 min to 171.2 min and thus the mean residence time of 5-FU rose significantly (P < 0.05). After the combined treatment, the maximal concentration of dihydro-5-fluorouracil in the plasma decreased from 61.06 microM to 29.70 microM (P < 0.01). The intratumoral concentrations of 5-FU were 34%-158% higher 6-96 h after the combined treatment than after the single 5-FU treatment. EtdUrd also caused a moderate increase in the intratumoral level of FdUMP. It is noteworthy, that EtdUrd increased the endogenous uridine concentration in the plasma from 18 microM to a maximum of 249 microM, and the level remained high for longer than 6 h. The present studies indicate that EtdUrd enhances the therapeutic index of 5-FU by reducing the catabolism, prolonging the plasma and intratumoral concentrations of 5-FU and, at the same time, offering protection to normal organs by increasing the endogenous uridine level.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Cell cycle disturbances and apoptosis induced by topotecan and gemcitabine on human lung cancer cell lines.

Apoptosis is a major mode of cell death in response to cytotoxic drug treatment. A correlation between induction of apoptosis and chemosensitivity has been documented in some preclinical models. Topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) and gemcitabine (a deoxycytidine analogue), two active new drugs for the treatment of lung cancer, were evaluated for their growth inhibitory effect on human lung cancer cell lines and their effect on cell cycle perturbation, apoptosis and apoptosis-related genes. The cytotoxicities of topotecan and gemcitabine on the human lung cancer cell lines H460 (wild-type-p53) and H322 (mutant p53 were determined after 72 h drug exposure employing the MTT assay. The apoptotic index (AI) was assessed by three methods: analysis of morphological changes using May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) staining, the TUNEL assay and FACS analysis. Cell cycle disturbances were studied by FACS and the number of cells expressing p53 and p21 were determined by immunohistochemistry. Both gemcitabine and topotecan had potent growth inhibitory effects in human lung cancer cell lines; combination treatment with these two drugs showed some additivity but no synergism. Induction of apoptosis after treatment was concentration- and time-dependent with both drugs and IC80 concentrations induced the highest values. The DNA histograms at 4, 24, 48 and 72 h indicate that topotecan at IC80 concentrations causes accumulation of cells in S and G2/M phases, whereas gemcitabine at IC80 concentrations causes, accumulation of cells in G1 phase. Both compounds induced p53 and p21 expression in the H460 cell line but not in the H322 cell line; the percentage of cells expressing p53 was highest at IC80 values, whereas the highest percentage of p21 positive cells could be induced with IC50 values. This could suggest that p53 induces cell cycle arrest at low drug concentrations, whereas p53 induces apoptosis at higher concentrations. In conclusion, p53-dependent and independent pathways of apoptosis exist in lung cancer cell lines. Activation of the p53 pathway depends on the induced cellular damage. Understanding the cell cycle disturbances induced by these drugs may help in the design of more rational treatment schedules.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1999

Scheduling of gemcitabine and cisplatin in Lewis lung tumour bearing mice.

We used the gemcitabine (dFdC) and cisplatin (cis-diamine dichloroplatinum CDDP) resistant murine NSCLC tumour Lewis Lung (LL) in C57/B16 mice to optimise scheduling of both drugs, since in previous in vivo studies no effective combination schedule of both compounds was found to overcome resistance to either drug. dFdC could not be combined at the previously determined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) (120 mg/kg, q3dx4) with CDDP at its MTD (9 mg/kg, q6dx2) (mean weight loss < 15% and < 15% toxic deaths), because of additive toxicity. Therefore, we lowered the dose of dFdC to 60 mg/kg (q3dx4) and of CDDP to 3 mg/kg (q6dx2), which caused an increase in antitumour effect compared with the activity of each compound alone at its MTD (growth delay factor (GDF) = 0.55, 0.13 and 2.56 for dFdC and CDDP alone and the combination, respectively). Changing the CDDP treatment schedule giving the total dose (6 mg/kg) only at day 0 caused unacceptable toxicity. This effect was not seen when mice were treated with the total dose of CDDP on day 9, but, the anti-tumour effect was not enhanced. To decrease toxicity, the dosage of dFdC was lowered to 50 mg/kg and combined with the total dose of CDDP on day 0, which caused a better antitumour effect than the combination of 60 mg/kg dFdC and 3 mg/kg CDDP (q6dx2) with acceptable toxicity. Schedule dependency was found for the combination: dFdC preceding CDDP by 4 h was the best treatment schedule in the LL tumours (GDF: 2.1) with acceptable toxicity. However, when the interval was increased to 24 h, toxicity became unacceptable (> 30% weight loss). The reverse schedule, in which CDDP preceded dFdC, did not lead to an increased antitumour effect or to increased toxicity. Adding amifostine, a selective chemoprotector, to the treatment decreased toxicity of the combination without affecting the antitumour effect. Increasing the CDDP dose to 9 mg/kg (day 0) under amifostine protection led to an improved therapeutic index.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Sequence-dependent growth inhibition and DNA damage formation by the irinotecan-5-fluorouracil combination in human colon carcinoma cell lines.

We evaluated irinotecan (CPT-11) together with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for improved cell growth inhibition with respect to that by either agent alone in the human colon carcinoma cell lines SW620, HT-29 and SNU-C4. Cells were exposed for 24 h to each drug, as well as to various combinations and sequences of low, fixed doses of one drug with higher varying doses of the other, cultured for two more days in drug-free medium and then assessed for growth response with the sulphorhodamine B assay. Multiple drug effect analysis was used to evaluate the data, which were then related to the amount of DNA damage occurring in the cells which was determined by a fluorescence-enhancement assay for DNA unwinding. Cellular responses were also related to thymidylate synthase topoisomerase I and carboxyl esterase activities, which were assessed by a ligand-binding and a 3H-release assay; a DNA decatenation assay; and a spectrophotometric method, respectively. IC50 values for 5-FU alone in the SW620, HT29 and SNU-C4 cells were 15.3 +/- 0.8, 8.2 +/- 1.3 and 2.2 +/- 0.7 microM, respectively, and for CPT-11 2.0 +/- 0.9, 2.5 +/- 0.5 and 3.8 +/- 0.3 microM, respectively. The differential responses to 5-FU alone were possibly determined by differences in substrate affinity and conversion rate of thymidylate synthase (K(m) of approximately 7.5, 5.0 and 2.5 microM and V0 of approximately 800, 200 and 2400 microM/h, respectively). The comparable cellular responses to CPT-11 alone might be accounted for by the counterbalancing effects of differences in topoisomerase I (1, 1, and 1.5 arbitrary units, respectively) and carboxyl esterase activities (5055 +/- 1789, 4080 +/- 752, 1713 +/- 522 mU/mg, respectively). IC20 CPT-11 prior to 5-FU was additive to synergistic in SW620, HT-29 and SNU-C4 cells (CIs of 0.7 +/- 0.1). By contrast, pre-treatment with IC20 5-FU antagonised the CPT-11-mediated growth inhibition (CIs of 1.9 +/- 0.4, 1.7 +/- 1.1, 2.5 +/- 0.9, respectively). Simultaneous drug treatment did not produce more cell growth inhibition than either drug alone in the SW620 and the HT-29 cells, but was additive or antagonistic in the SNU-C4 cells (CIs of 1.1 +/- 0.3 and 2.2 +/- 1.4), depending on the ratio of the drugs. Increased DNA damage in the SW620 and HT-29 cells was only seen when IC20 CPT-11 preceded IC50 5-FU, resulting in approximately 40 and 25%, respectively, more lesions than for IC50 5-FU alone. In the SNU-C4 cells, not only such a treatment, but also simultaneous drug treatment produced (30 to 60%) more DNA damage than either drug alone. Our results show clear sequence-dependent antiproliferative effects and DNA damage formation by CPT-11 and 5-FU at combinations of low, fixed doses with higher, varying doses in cultured human colon carcinoma cells, and may be of relevance to the design of improved chemotherapeutic regimens in this disease.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetic schedule finding study of the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine possible schedule dependent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC) and cisplatin (cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum, CDDP) in patients with advanced stage solid tumors in a phase I trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 33 patients with advanced stage solid tumors were treated with gemcitabine (30-min infusion, 800 mg/m2) and cisplatin (one-hour infusion, 50 mg/m2). Sixteen patients had a four-hour interval between gemcitabine (days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (days 1 and 8), followed by the reverse schedule and seventeen patients had a 24-hour interval between gemcitabine (days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (days 2 and 9), followed by the reverse schedule. Gemcitabine and cisplatin pharmacokinetics were measured in plasma and white blood cells (WBC), isolated from blood samples taken at several time points after the start of treatment. RESULTS: A four-hour time interval between both agents did not reveal major differences in plasma pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine, dFdU (deaminated gemcitabine) and platinum (Pt), and of gemcitabine-triphosphate (dFdCTP) accumulation and Pt-DNA adduct formation in WBC between the two different sequences of gemcitabine and cisplatin. In the patients treated with the 24-hour interval, cisplatin before gemcitabine did not significantly change peak gemcitabine levels and the AUC of plasma dFdU, but tended to increase dFdCTP AUC in WBC 1.5-fold (P < 0.06). Gemcitabine before cisplatin decreased the plasma AUC of Pt 2.1-fold (P = 0.03). No significant differences in Pt-DNA adduct levels in WBC were found, although gemcitabine before cisplatin tended to increase the 24-hour retention of Pt-DNA adducts. Creatinine clearance on day 28 was related to the peak plasma levels of total Pt (linear regression coefficient (r) = 0.47, P = 0.02, n = 26). Furthermore, the increase in the Pt-GG to Pt-AG ratio 24 hours after cisplatin treatment was related to the overall response of patients (r = 0.89, P < 0.01, n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Of all schedules the treatment of patients with cisplatin 24 hours before gemcitabine led to the highest dFdCTP accumulation in WBC and total Pt levels in plasma. These characteristics formed the basis for further investigation of this schedule in a phase II clinical study.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Gemcitabine-cisplatin: a schedule finding study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerability of four alternating cisplatin-gemcitabine schedules. A secondary aim was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with advanced solid tumors received alternating sequences with a 4- and 24-hour interval of cisplatin and gemcitabine. Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was administered as a 30-min infusion on day 1, 8 and 15, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 over 1 hour on day 1 and 8; in case of the 24-hour time interval the second drug was administered one day later. Four cisplatin-gemcitabine schedules were studied: gemcitabine four hour before cisplatin (10 patients), or vice versa (14 patients) and gemcitabine twenty-four hours before cisplatin (9 patients) or vice versa (8 patients). The sequence of drug administration was reversed in the second cycle of therapy in each individual patient, enabling the evaluation of sequence-dependent side effects. Twenty-six patients had received prior chemotherapy, of which twenty-one platinum-based. RESULTS: The main toxicity was myelosuppression. Overall, grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 27 out of 41 patients (66%) and was not schedule dependent. No serious bleeding occurred. Leukopenia was significantly different between the 4 alternating schedules (P = 0.01); gemcitabine 24 hours before cisplatin was significantly less toxic compared to both cisplatin 4 hours and 24 hours before gemcitabine (P = 0.01 and P = 0.003, respectively). Furthermore, paired analysis of the 4-hour and 24-hour data sets showed that leukopenia was significantly more serious when cisplatin preceded gemcitabine (P = 0.005). Although most patients received prior treatment, both prior chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not related to toxicity. Overall, grade 3 and 4 leukopenia occurred in 19 out of 41 patients (46%). Anemia (Hb < or = 6.0 mmol/l) was not sequence dependent and was observed in 63% of patients. Myelotoxicity was cumulative between cycles and caused frequent omission of gemcitabine on day 15. Overall, in 51% of administered cycles there was no omission of gemcitabine. A mean of 3.5 therapy cycles was administered. Non-hematological toxicity was moderate, consisting mainly of grade 1 and 2 nausea/vomiting and fatigue, and was not schedule dependent. Recently, we described that the schedule in which cisplatin was administered 24 hours before gemcitabine produced the best pharmacological profile. Based on this and because toxicity was manageable, the schedule cisplatin 24 hours prior to gemcitabine was chosen for phase II evaluation. Nine out of thirty-six evaluable patients had an objective response. These responses were observed in head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, adenocarcinoma of unknown origin, ovarian and esophageal carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Myelosuppression was the most important toxicity. Leukopenia was schedule dependent: gemcitabine before cisplatin was less toxic than the reversed sequence, in this respect. Some encouraging responses were seen in patients with esophageal cancer. Currently, a phase II study with cisplatin 24 hours before gemcitabine is ongoing in patients with advanced upper gastro-intestinal tumors.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Mechanisms of synergism between cisplatin and gemcitabine in ovarian and non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines.

2',2'-Difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine, dFdC) and cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum (cisplatin, CDDP) are active agents against ovarian cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CDDP acts by formation of platinum (Pt)-DNA adducts; dFdC by dFdCTP incorporation into DNA, subsequently leading to inhibition of exonuclease and DNA repair. Previously, synergism between both compounds was found in several human and murine cancer cell lines when cells were treated with these drugs in a constant ratio. In the present study we used different combinations of both drugs (one drug at its IC25 and the other in a concentration range) in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, its CDDP-resistant variant ADDP, its dFdC-resistant variant AG6000 and two NSCLC cell lines, H322 (human) and Lewis lung (LL) (murine). Cells were exposed for 4, 24 and 72 h with a total culture time of 96 h, and possible synergism was evaluated by median drug effect analysis by calculating a combination index (CI; CI < 1 indicates synergism). With CDDP at its IC25, the average CIs calculated at the IC50, IC75 IC90 and IC95 after 4, 24 and 72 h of exposure were < 1 for all cell lines, indicating synergism, except for the CI after 4 h exposure in the LL cell line which showed an additive effect. With dFdC at its IC25, the CIs for the combination with CDDP after 24 h were < 1 in all cell lines, except for the CIs after 4 h exposure in the LL and H322 cell lines which showed an additive effect. At 72 h exposure all CIs were < 1. CDDP did not significantly affect dFdCTP accumulation in all cell lines. CDDP increased dFdC incorporation into both DNA and RNA of the A2780 cell lines 33- and 79-fold (P < 0.01) respectively, and tended to increase the dFdC incorporation into RNA in all cell lines. In the AG6000 and LL cell lines, CDDP and dFdC induced > 25% more DNA strand breaks (DSB) than each drug alone; however, in the other cell lines no effect, or even a decrease in DSB, was observed. dFdC increased the cellular Pt accumulation after 24 h incubation only in the ADDP cell line. However, dFdC did enhance the Pt-DNA adduct formation in the A2780, AG6000, ADDP and LL cell lines (1.6-, 1.4-, 2.9- and 1.6-fold respectively). This increase in Pt-DNA adduct formation seems to be related to the incorporation of dFdC into DNA (r = 0.91). No increase in DNA platination was found in the H322 cell line. dFdC only increased Pt-DNA adduct retention in the A2780 and LL cell lines, but decreased the Pt-DNA adduct retention in the AG6000 cell line. In conclusion, the synergism between dFdC and CDDP appears to be mainly due to an increase in Pt-DNA adduct formation possibly related to changes in DNA due to dFdC incorporation into DNA.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Common resistance mechanisms to deoxynucleoside analogues in variants of the human erythroleukaemic line K562.

Resistant variants of the human leukaemic line K562 were developed using selection with the deoxynucleoside analogues cytosine arabinoside, 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, fludarabine and gemcitabine. The resistant lines displayed a high degree of cross resistance to all deoxynucleoside analogues, with little or no cross resistance to other agents. There was a profound accumulation defect of all nucleoside analogues in the resistant variants but no significant defect in nucleoside transport in any of the variants. 5' nucleotidase activity was strongly increased and deoxycytidine kinase activity was moderately reduced in all of the resistant variants, resulting in reduced accumulation of triphosphate analogues. In addition a deletion in one of the alleles of the deoxycytidine kinase was detected in the fludarabine-resistant line. Ribonucleotide reductase activity was found to be strongly increased in the gemcitabine-selected line and purine nucleoside phosphorylase was increased in the 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine-selected line. Free nucleotide pools were increased in the 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine-selected line. There was no expression of the mdr1 gene by the resistant lines. Karyotypic analysis and FISH experiments using a 6q21 specific probe showed alterations in the 6(q16-q22) region which contains the 5'-nucleotidase gene. Early events in the activation and degradation of deoxynucleoside analogues appear to constitute common mechanisms of resistance to these compounds.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1999

Selective cell kill of the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in multilayered postconfluent tumor cell cultures.

Both gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC) and cisplatin (cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum) have significant anticancer activity against ovarian, head and neck, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). dFdC can be incorporated into DNA and RNA, and inhibit DNA repair, while cisplatin can form Pt-DNA adducts. We previously observed schedule-dependent synergism of the combination of dFdC and cisplatin in monolayer cell cultures. We now evaluated whether the combination would also enable selective cell kill in multilayered postconfluent cell cultures, since each compound showed variable activity in multilayered cells. The combination was tested in multilayered cultures from cell lines with a different histological origin: the human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line UMSCC-22B (22B), the human NSCLC cell line H322, and ADDP, a cisplatin-resistant variant of the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780. Sensitivity of the multilayered cells was dependent on exposure duration and sequence of the drug combinations, which were added in a constant molar ratio (dFdC:cisplatin 1:100), with a total exposure time of 96 h. The type of interaction was related to the degree of resistance of the cell lines to either dFdC or cisplatin. Thus, the very sensitive 22B cells only showed an additive effect when cells were preincubated for 24 h with dFdC prior to exposure to the combination. In contrast, in the resistant ADDP and H322 cells, synergism was the most common profile (three out of four schedules tested). This is of special relevance when we take into account that these drugs only show cytostatic effects when administered alone, whereas the combination produced cytotoxic cell killing. In conclusion, combining dFdC with cisplatin can be at least additive, but synergistic in multilayered postconfluent cells resistant to dFdC and cisplatin.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1999

Thymidylate synthase: a target for combination therapy and determinant of chemotherapeutic response in colorectal cancer.

In this review, we describe the role of thymidylate synthase (TS) as a determinant of chemotherapeutic response. TS is an essential enzyme for the de novo synthesis of thymidylate and subsequent DNA synthesis. TS has been used as a target for cancer chemotherapy in the development of fluoropyrimidines such as 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine and novel folate-based TS inhibitors such as ZD1694 (Tomudex, Raltitrexed), LY231514, AG337 (Thymitaq) and GW1843U89. All these antifolates have different transport mechanisms and various polyglutamylation and accumulation patterns which are all important for drug sensitivity. An update of clinical studies with TS inhibitors (antifolate-based TS inhibitors and 5FU combination studies) will be given and new perspectives for clinical development will be discussed. The prognostic or predictive value of TS (in vitro, in vivo and in patients) will be reviewed, focusing on colorectal cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1999

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between gemcitabine and paclitaxel in a phase I/II study in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with advanced NSCLC received the following in a 3-week schedule: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) (30 minutes, days 1 and 8) and paclitaxel 150 (n = 9) or 200 mg/m(2) (n = 9) before gemcitabine (3 hours, day 1). Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in mononuclear cells were studied. RESULTS: Gemcitabine did not influence paclitaxel pharmacokinetics at 150 and 200 mg/m(2) (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 7.7 and 8.8 micromol/ L. h, respectively; maximum plasma concentration [C(max)], 3.2 and 4.0 micromol/L, respectively), and paclitaxel did not influence that of gemcitabine (C(max), 30 +/- 3 micromol/L) and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine. Paclitaxel, however, dose-dependently increased the C(max) of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP), the active metabolite of gemcitabine, from 55 +/- 10 to 106 +/- 16 pmol/10(6) cells.( )No significant difference in the AUC of dFdCTP was observed. Moreover, the gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination significantly increased ribonucleotide levels, most pronounced for adenosine triphosphate (six- to seven-fold). Postinfusion paclitaxel AUC was related to pretreatment hepatic function (bilirubin: r = 0. 79; P <.001) and to the percentage decrease in platelets (r = 0.61; P =.009). The latter was also related to the duration of paclitaxel concentration above 0.1 micromol/L (r = 0.62; P =.007). Gemcitabine C(max )was related to the percentage decrease in platelets (r = 0. 58; P =.01), pretreatment hepatic function (bilirubin: r = 0.77; P <. 001), and to plasma creatinine (r = 0.5; P =.03). The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were not related to response or survival. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine and paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were related to the percentage decrease in platelets. Paclitaxel did not affect the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine, nor did gemcitabine affect the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, but paclitaxel increased dFdCTP accumulation. This might enhance the antitumor activity of gemcitabine.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Thymidylate synthase level as the main predictive parameter for sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil, but not for folate-based thymidylate synthase inhibitors, in 13 nonselected colon cancer cell lines.

Thymidylate synthase (TS), a critical enzyme in the de novo synthesis of thymidylate, is an important target for fluoropyrimidines and folate-based TS inhibitors. In a panel of 13 nonselected human colon cancer cell lines, we evaluated the role of TS levels in sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and four folate-based TS inhibitors that have been introduced recently into the clinic: ZD1694 (Tomudex, Raltitrexed, TDX), GW1843U89 (GW), LY231514 (LY), and AG337 (Thymitaq, AG). Because the latter compounds have different transport and polyglutamylation characteristics, we also related these parameters with drug sensitivity, measured by the sulforhodamine B assay after 72 h of drug exposure. For 5FU, the IC50s varied from 0.8 to 43.0 microM. Leucovorin (LV) potentiated the activity of 5FU in only 4 of 13 cell lines. Sensitivity to folate-based TS inhibitors was variable; IC50s were in the range of: 5.3-59.0 nM TDX; 11.0-1570 nM LY; and 0.5-8.9 nM GW. Eleven of 13 cell lines had an IC50 for AG between 1.3 and 5.3 microM. Two cell lines were resistant to AG, Colo201 and SW1116, with IC50s of 27 and 29 microM, respectively. TS catalytic activity (conversion of dUMP to dTMP) varied from 62 to 777 pmol/h/10(6) cells. The number of FdUMP binding sites varied from 32 to 231 fmol/10(6) cells. Regression analysis showed a significant relation between TS catalytic activity and IC50s for 5FU and 5FU/LV. Kis for FdUMP showed a significant Spearman rank correlation with the IC50s of AG and GW. The role of antifolate transport, accumulation, and polyglutamylation was determined with [3H]methotrexate (MTX) as a reference compound. [3H]MTX influx via the reduced folate carrier varied from 18.6 to 150 fmol/10(6) cells/min. Folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) activity showed a range from 47 to 429 pmol/10(6) cells/h. A total of 24 h of [3H]MTX accumulation showed a 20-fold variation, from 1.2 to 21.8 pmol/10(6) cells. FPGS levels showed a Spearman rank positive correlation with cytotoxicity to TDX. In conclusion, in a heterogeneous nonselected human colon cancer cell line panel, the best predictor for sensitivity to 5FU and 5FU/LV was TS activity. Multiple sensitivity determinants were of importance for antifolate TS inhibitors, including FPGS activity and TS enzyme kinetics.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed1999

Multiple mechanisms of resistance to polyglutamatable and lipophilic antifolates in mammalian cells: role of increased folylpolyglutamylation, expanded folate pools, and intralysosomal drug sequestration.

Chinese hamster ovary PyrR100 cells display more than 1000-fold resistance to pyrimethamine (Pyr), a lipophilic antifolate inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase. PyrR100 cells had wild-type DHFR activity, lost folate exporter activity, and had a 4-fold increased activity of a low pH folic acid transporter. Here we report on the marked alterations identified in PyrR100 cells compared with parental cells: 1) approximately 100-fold decreased folic acid growth requirement; 2) a 25-fold higher glucose growth requirement in Pyr-containing medium; 3) a 2.5- to 4.1-fold increase in folylpolyglutamate synthetase activity; 4) a 3-fold increase in the accumulation of [3H]folic acid and a 3-fold expansion of the intracellular folate pools; 5) a 4-fold increase in the activity of the lysosomal marker beta-hexoseaminidase, suggesting an increased lysosome number/PyrR100 cell; and 6) a small reduction in the steady-state accumulation of [3H]Pyr and no evidence of catabolism or modification of cellular [3H]Pyr. Consequently, PyrR100 cells were markedly resistant to the lipophilic antifolates trimetrexate (40-fold) and AG377 (30-fold) and to the polyglutamatable antifolates 5,10-Dideaza-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid (DDATHF) (26-fold) and AG2034 (14-fold). Resistance to these drugs was reversed in PyrR100 cells transferred into folate-depleted medium. In conclusion, these multiple resistance factors collectively result in a prominent increase in folate accumulation, an expansion of the intracellular folylpolyglutamate pool, and abolishment of the cytotoxic activity of polyglutamatable and lipophilic antifolates. The role of increased lysosome number per cell in sequestration of hydrophobic weak base drugs such as Pyr is also discussed as a novel mechanism of drug resistance.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Experimental drugs and drug combinations in pancreatic cancer.

The current role of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer is limited. Chemotherapy usually consists of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and gemcitabine either as a single agent or in combinations. However, response rates are below 15% with minor effects on overall survival. Due to the aggressive behavior of the disease, current emphasis of new experimental chemotherapy is also focusing on clinical benefit: improvement of pain, performance status or weight. The results with gemcitabine indicated that evaluation of new chemotherapeutic agents in pancreatic cancer should not be limited to the evaluation of response rates; single agent gemcitabine not only showed higher response rates than 5FU, but also resulted in clinical benefit for the patients. Several new agents have been introduced into the clinic for treatment of various gastro-intestinal malignancies, whereas novel agents with different types of targets, such as marimastat deserve further attention. Several oral formulations of 5FU, such as capecitabine, UFT, and eniluracil with 5FU, aim to simulate long-term continuous infusion. Response rates of these formulations are comparable to those of 5FU continuous infusion and 5FU bolus injections. However, the convenience of oral administration with reliable plasma drug concentrations makes these agents very attractive as a replacement of traditional 5FU administration. Since 5FU acts by inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS), resulting in inhibition of DNA synthesis, several new antifolates, directed towards TS, have been developed. However, these agents, such as ZD1694 (Tomudex, Raltitrexed) and LY231514 (MTA, multitargetted antifolate) showed only limited efficacy. Other new agents active in colorectal cancer, e.g. the topoisomerase I inhibitors topotecan and CPT-11, showed only minor activity. The same was observed for the taxanes. Combinations of gemcitabine (cisplatin, 5FU, epirubicin, marimastat) show promising activities, not only regarding response but also with respect to clinical benefit. The effects were better than that for each agent separately. Thus, despite limited activity of single agents, novel combinations especially with gemcitabine are promising, with emphasis on improvement of the clinical benefit of patients.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1999

Combination studies of antifolates with 5-fluorouracil in colon cancer cell lines.

The combined cytotoxic effects of the thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and different antifolates were studied in seven colon cancer cell lines. Growth inhibition of the antifolates, Nolatrexed, Raltitrexed, GW1843U89, or MTA in combination with 5FU, was determined and multiple drug effect analysis showed that the drugs acted mostly additively. The only synergistic interaction was found for 5FU and Nolatrexed in the LS174T cell line. Also Raltitrexed and 5FU were slightly synergistic in WiDr/F cells grown at low folate levels, but for the other cell lines grown at high folate levels this combination was more antagonistic. GW1843U89 and 5FU were mainly additive, while 5FU and MTA showed antagonism in WiDr and additivity in LS174T. The effect of the drugs at their target was evaluated by in situ TS inhibition. We observed lower TS activity in all cells when two drugs were used instead of one. Statistical analysis revealed that none of the values of the combinations was higher or lower than could be expected from the product of the effect of single drugs. We concluded that the effects on TS inhibition were additive for all 5FU/antifolate combinations in all cell lines. DNA strand break formation, as a result of TS inhibition, was measured by means of a fluorometric analysis of DNA unwinding. Raltitrexed-induced DNA damage was significantly increased by 5FU in WiDr cells [single agent: 67% double stranded (ds) DNA, combination: 39% ds DNA, P<0.0001]. In LS174T a trend for antagonistic effects was observed for combinations of MTA, GW1843U89, or Raltitrexed and 5FU. The combinations showed additive effects in WiDr/F cells. The overall conclusion of the three assays in each of the cell lines indicated that 5FU and antifolate combinations were predominantly additive in colon cancer cells.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed1998

A structurally altered human reduced folate carrier with increased folic acid transport mediates a novel mechanism of antifolate resistance.

CEM/MTX is a subline of human CCRF-CEM leukemia cells which displays >200-fold resistance to methotrexate (MTX) due to defective transport via the reduced folate carrier (RFC). CEM/MTX-low folate (LF) cells, derived by a gradual deprivation of folic acid from 2.3 microM to 2 nM (LF) in the cell culture medium of CEM/MTX cells, resulted in a >20-fold overexpression of a structurally altered RFC featuring; 1) a wild type Km value for MTX transport but a 31-fold and 9-fold lower Km values for folic acid and leucovorin, respectively, relative to wild type RFC; 2) a 10-fold RFC1 gene amplification along with a >20-fold increased expression of the main 3.1-kilobase RFC1 mRNA; 3) a marked stimulation of MTX transport by anions (i.e. chloride); and 4) a G --> A mutation at nucleotide 227 of the RFC cDNA in both CEM/MTX-LF and CEM/MTX, resulting in a lysine for glutamate substitution at amino acid residue 45 predicted to reside within the first transmembrane domain of the human RFC. Upon transfer of CEM/MTX-LF cells to folate-replete medium (2.3 microM folic acid), the more efficient folic acid uptake in CEM/MTX-LF cells resulted in a 7- and 24-fold elevated total folate pool compared with CEM and CEM/MTX cells, respectively (500 versus 69 and 21 pmol/mg of protein, respectively). This markedly elevated intracellular folate pool conferred a novel mechanism of resistance to polyglutamatable (e.g. ZD1694, DDATHF, and AG2034) and lipophilic antifolates (e.g. trimetrexate and pyrimethamine) by abolishing their polyglutamylation and circumventing target enzyme inhibition.

Affinity Labels↗